While hormesis is an intriguing scientific hypothesis, this paper argues that it is not yet an acceptable basis for policy-making. Two reasons are given for this assessment. First, although hormesis has suggestive explanatory power, it does not yet have the predictive successes that indicate a general reliability sufficient for policy-making. Second, the regulatory agenda for chemical exposures is usually focused, for good ethical reasons, on protecting people from involuntary and potentially harmful exposures, rather than focused on maximizing public health benefits.
1 Calabrese EF . Historical blunders: how toxicology got the dose-response relationship half right. Cell Mol Biol2005; 51: 643–654.
2.
2 Kitchin KT Drane JW . A critique of the use of hormesis in risk assessment. Hum Exp Toxicol2005; 24: 249–253.
3.
3 Calabrese EF Baldwin LA . Hormesis: the dose-response revolution. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol2003; 43: 175–197.
4.
4 Rozman KK . Hormesis and risk assessment. Hum Exp Toxicol2005; 24: 255–257.
5.
5 Popper K . Science: conjectures and refutations.London and New York: Routledge; 2002. p. 43–78.
6.
6 Calabrese EF Baldwin LA . Hormesis: U-shaped dose responses and their centrality in toxicology. Trends Pharmacol Sci2001; 22: 285–291.
7.
7 Pickrell JA Oehme FW . Examining the risk and benefits of replacing traditional dose-response with hormesis. Hum Exp Toxicol2005; 24: 259–264.
8.
8 Pickrell JA Oehme FW . Examining the risks and benefits of considering both the traditional dose-response and hormesis in arriving at an acceptable exposure level. Hum Exp Toxicol2006; 25: 23–27.
9.
9 Weltje L vom Saal FS Oehlmann J . Reproductive stimulation by low doses of xenoestrogens contrasts with the view of hormesis as an adaptive response. Hum Exp Toxicol2005; 24: 431–437.
10.
10 Thayer KA Melnick R Burns K Davis D Huff J . Fundamental flaws of hormesis for public health decisions. Environ Health Perspect2005; 113: 1271–1276.
11.
11 Kaiser J . Sipping from a poisoned chalice. Science2003; 302: 376–379.
12.
12 Fiorino D . Making environmental policy.Berkeley, CA: SAGE Publications; 1995.
13.
13 National Research Council. Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process.Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1983.
