Hitherto, the Landscape Reconstruction Algorithm (LRA) has been the only truly quantitative approach to stand-scale palynology. However, the LRA requires information on pollen productivity and dispersal, which is not always available. The alternative approach MARCO POLO (MAnipulating pollen sums to ReCOnstruct POllen of Local Origin) presented here is solely based on pollen values and does not rely on a pollen dispersal function. In a stepwise fashion, MARCO POLO removes those pollen types from the pollen sum whose values are significantly higher than in a neighbouring large basin. The resulting regional pollen sum is free of the disturbing factor of (extra-)local pollen. Based on this sum, comparison with the pollen record from the large basin allows calculating sharp (extra-)local signals. Treating the (extra-)local pollen portion with representation factors (R-values) then produces a quantitative reconstruction of the stand-scale vegetation composition. We tested MARCO POLO and the LRA on a dataset of pollen surface samples and forest vegetation relevés from northern Central Europe. Both approaches reconstruct the presence or absence of taxa at the stand scale within a small margin of error. Where observed cover was ⩾2%, both models always reconstructed presence, where modelled cover was ⩾2% the taxon was always present. Overall, both approaches perform well in reconstructing the cover of taxa within a 100-m radius. In our tests, MARCO POLO is slightly better at reconstructing cover values for more taxa. Although some model parameters evidently need revision, the simple correlative approach of MARCO POLO appears to perform at least as well as the complex LRA model.
AndersenST (1967) Tree-pollen rain in a mixed deciduous forest in South Jutland (Denmark). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology3: 267–275.
2.
AndersenST (1970) The relative pollen productivity and pollen representation of North European trees, and correction factors for tree pollen spectra: Determined by surface pollen analyses from forests. Danmarks geologiske undersøgelse Række2(96): 99.
3.
AndersenST (1973) The differential pollen productivity of trees and its significance for the interpretation of a pollen diagram from a forested region. In: BirksJHBWestR (eds) Quaternary Plant Ecology. New York; Toronto, ON, Canada: Wiley & Sons, pp. 109–115.
4.
BradshawRHW (1981) Quantitative reconstruction of local woodland vegetation using pollen analysis from a small basin in Norfolk, England. Journal of Ecology69(3): 941–955.
5.
BradshawRHW (2013) Stand-scale palynology. In: EliasSAMockCJ (eds) Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 847–853.
6.
Braun-BlanquetJ (1964) Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. Wien; New York: Springer.
7.
BuntingMArmitageRBinneyH. (2005) Estimates of ‘relative pollen productivity’ and ‘relevant source area of pollen’ for major tree taxa in two Norfolk (UK) woodlands. The Holocene15(3): 459–465.
8.
CalcoteR (1995) Pollen source area and pollen productivity: Evidence from forest hollows. Journal of Ecology83(4): 591–602.
9.
DavisMB (1963) On the theory of pollen analysis. American Journal of Science261: 897–912.
10.
DavisMBCalcoteRRSugitaS. (1998) Patchy invasion and the origin of a hemlock-hardwoods forest mosaic. Ecology79(8): 2641–2659.
11.
DavisMBSugitaSCalcoteRR. (1994) Historical development of alternate communities in a hemlock- hardwood forest in northern Michigan, USA. In: EdwardsPJ (ed.) Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology. Oxford: The British Ecological Society by Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 19–39.
12.
FægriKIversenJ (1989) Textbook of Pollen Analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
13.
FagerlindF (1952) The real significance of pollen diagrams. Botaniska Notiser105: 185–224.
HeideKM (1984) Holocene pollen stratigraphy from a lake and small hollow in north-central Wisconsin, USA. Palynology8(1): 3–19.
16.
HellmanSGaillardM-JBroströmA. (2008) Effects of the sampling design and selection of parameter values on pollen-based quantitative reconstructions of regional vegetation: A case study in southern Sweden using the REVEALS model. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany17(5): 445–459.
17.
JacksonST (1990) Pollen source area and representation in small lakes of the northeastern United States. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology63(1–2): 53–76.
18.
JacobsonGL (1979) The palaeoecology of White Pine (Pinus strobus) in Minnesota. Journal of Ecology67: 697–726.
19.
JacobsonGLBradshawRHW (1981) The selection of sites for paleovegetational studies. Quaternary Research16: 80–96.
20.
JanssenCR (1959) Alnus as a disturbing factor in pollen diagrams. Acta Botanica Neerlandica8(1): 55–58.
21.
JanssenCR (1966) Recent pollen spectra from the deciduous and coniferous-deciduous forests of northeastern Minnesota: A study in pollen dispersal. Ecology47(5): 804–825.
22.
JoostenHDe KlerkP (2002) What’s in a name? Some thoughts on pollen classification, identification, and nomenclature in Quaternary palynology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology122(1–2): 29–45.
23.
KuparinenAMarkkanenTRiikonenH. (2007) Modeling air-mediated dispersal of spores, pollen and seeds in forested areas. Ecological Modelling208: 177–188.
24.
LangG (1994) Quartäre Vegetationsgeschichte Europas. Jena; Stuttgart; New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
25.
MatthiasINielsenABGieseckeT (2012) Evaluating the effect of flowering age and forest structure on pollen productivity estimates. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany21(6): 471–484.
26.
MazierFGaillardMJKunešP. (2012) Testing the effect of site selection and parameter setting on REVEALS-model estimates of plant abundance using the Czech Quaternary Palynological Database. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology187: 38–49.
MosimannJ (1965) Statistical methods for the pollen analyst: Multinomial and negative multinomial techniques. In: KummelBRaupD (eds) Handbook of Paleontological Techniques. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freemann, pp. 636–673.
29.
OldfieldF (1970) Some aspects of scale and complexity in pollen-analytically based palaeoecology. Pollen et Spores12: 163–172.
30.
Overballe-PetersenMVNielsenABBradshawRHW (2013) Quantitative vegetation reconstruction from pollen analysis and historical inventory data around a Danish small forest hollow. Journal of Vegetation Science24(4): 755–771.
31.
PautassoMAasGQuelozV. (2013) European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback – A conservation biology challenge. Biological Conservation158: 37–49.
32.
PrenticeICWebbTIII (1986) Pollen percentages, tree abundances and the Fagerlind effect. Journal of Quaternary Science1(1): 35–43.
33.
RiggsDSGuarnieriJAAddelmanS (1978) Fitting straight lines when both variables are subject to error. Life Sciences22: 1305–1360.
34.
SpangenbergA (2008) 2000 Jahre Waldentwicklung auf nährstoff- und basenreichen Standorten im mitteleuropäischen Jungpleistozän – Fallstudie Naturschutzgebiet Eldena (Vorpommern, Deutschland). PhD Thesis, University of Greifswald. Available at: http://ub-ed.ub.uni-greifswald.de/opus/volltexte/2008/535/.
35.
SugitaS (1994) Pollen representation of vegetation in quaternary sediments: Theory and method in patchy vegetation. Journal of Ecology82(4): 881–897.
36.
SugitaS (2007a) Theory of quantitative reconstruction of vegetation I: Pollen from large sites REVEALS regional vegetation composition. The Holocene17(2): 229–241.
37.
SugitaS (2007b) Theory of quantitative reconstruction of vegetation II: All you need is LOVE. The Holocene17(2): 243–257.
38.
SugitaSParshallTCalcoteR (2006) Detecting differences in vegetation among paired sites using pollen records. The Holocene16(8): 1123–1135.
39.
SugitaSParshallTCalcoteR. (2010) Testing the Landscape Reconstruction Algorithm for spatially explicit reconstruction of vegetation in northern Michigan and Wisconsin. Quaternary Research74(2): 289–300.
40.
TauberH (1965) Differential pollen dispersion and the interpretation of pollen diagrams, with a contribution to the interpretation of the elm fall. Danmarks geologiske undersøgelse Række2(89): 1–69.
41.
TheuerkaufMDrägerNKienelU. (2015) Effects of changes in land management practices on pollen productivity of open vegetation during the last century derived from varved lake sediments. The Holocene25(5): 733–744.
42.
TheuerkaufMKuparinenAJoostenH (2013) Pollen productivity estimates strongly depend on assumed pollen dispersal. The Holocene23(1): 14–24.
43.
WebbTIIIHoweSEBradshawRHW. (1981) Estimating plant abundances from pollen percentages: The use of regression analysis. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology34: 269–300.
