This paper investigates the moderating role of institutional factors on returns to ICT skill usage among different groups of workers in eight European labour markets. Using PIAAC data, the paper leverages the segmentation of contractual status, allowing for heterogeneous wage effects among workers holding permanent and temporary contracts. Furthermore, this study considers how gaps in ICT wage premiums mirror the compositional differences in national-specific trade union densities among contractual groups, demonstrating that wage premiums associated with ICT usage are not univocally defined by task content or demand-supply dynamics for specific sectors and occupations. The results highlight different returns between labour market segments according to national-specific trade union densities of temporary and permanent workers, revealing how the consequences of technological change are shaped by institutional cleavages.
AcemogluD (2002) Technical change inequality and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature40(1): 7–72. DOI: 10.1257/0022051026976
2.
AcemogluDAutorD (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. In: CardDAshenfelterO (eds). Handbook of labor economics. Chicago: Elsevier, 4, 1043–1171.
3.
AcemogluDRestrepoP (2020) Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy128(6): 2188–2244.
4.
AdolfssonMBaranowska-RatajALundmarkA (2022) Temporary employment, employee representation, and employer-paid training: a comparative analysis. European Sociological Review38(5): 785–798.
5.
AutorDLevyFMurnaneRJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics118(4): 1279–1333.
6.
BarbieriPCutuliG (2016) Employment protection legislation, labour market dualism, and inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review32(4): 501–516.
7.
BarbieriPCutuliG (2018) Dual labour market intermediaries in Italy: how to lay off “lemons”—Thereby creating a problem of adverse selection. De Economist166: 477–502.
8.
BarbieriPGioachinF (2022) Social origin and secondary labour market entry: ascriptive and institutional inequalities over the early career in Italy and Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility77: 100670.
9.
BechterBBrandlB (2015) Measurement and analysis of industrial relations aggregates: what is the relevant unit of analysis in comparative research?European Political Science14: 422–438.
10.
BechterBBrandlBMeardiG (2012) Sectors or countries? Typologies and levels of analysis in comparative industrial relations. European Journal of Industrial Relations18(3): 185–202.
11.
BeissingerTBaudyP (2015). The impact of temporary agency work on trade union wage setting: a theoretical analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8802, Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2564935
12.
BenassiCVlandasT (2016) Union inclusiveness and temporary agency workers: the role of power resources and union ideology European. Journal of Industrial Relations22(1): 522.
13.
BentolilaSDoladoJJJimenoJF (2019). Dual labour marketsrevisited. CESifo Working Paper No. 7479, Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3338834
14.
BergerTEngzellP (2022) Industrial automation and intergenerational income mobility in the United States. Social Science Research104: 102686.
15.
BiselloMPeruffoEFernandez-MaciasE, et al. (2019) How computerisation is transforming jobs: evidence from the European working conditions survey. JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-02. Brussels: Joint Research Centre.
16.
BrattiMContiMSulisG (2018). Employment protection, temporary contracts and firm-provided training: Evidence from italy. IZA Discussion Paper No. 11339, Available at SSRN:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3129283
17.
CabralesADoladoJMoraR (2017) Dual employment protection and (lack of) on-the-job training: PIAAC evidence for Spain and other European countries. SERIEs8(4): 345–371. DOI: 10.1007/s13209-017-0166-9.
18.
CarverLDoellgastV (2021) Dualism or solidarity? conditions for union success in regulating precarious work. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(4): 367–385.
19.
CetruloACirilloVGuarascioD (2019) Weaker jobs, weaker innovation. Exploring the effects of temporary employment on new products. Applied Economics51(59): 6350–6375.
20.
CetteGNevouxSPyL (2022) The impact of ICTs and digitalization on productivity and labor share: evidence from French firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology31(8): 669–692.
21.
CutuliGGuettoR (2013) Fixed-term contracts, economic conjuncture, and training opportunities: a comparative analysis across European labour markets. European Sociological Review29: 616–629.
22.
DauthWFindeisenSSuedekumJ, et al. (2021) The adjustment of labor markets to robots. Journal of the European Economic Association19(6): 3104–3153.
23.
De VriesGJGentileEMiroudotS, et al. (2020) The rise of robots and the fall of routine jobs. Labour Economics66: 101885. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101885.
24.
DiPreteTGouxDMaurinE, et al. (2006) Work and pay in flexible and regulated labor markets: a generalized perspective on institutional evolution and inequality trends in Europe and the US. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility24: 311–332.
25.
Eurofound (2016) What Do Europeans Do at Work? A Task-Based Analysis: European Jobs Monitor 2016. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
26.
FauserSGebelM (2023) Labor market dualism and the heterogeneous wage gap for temporary employment: a multilevel study across 30 countries. Socio-Economic Review S1–23. DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwac072
27.
Fernández-MacíasEBiselloM (2022) A comprehensive taxonomy of tasks for assessing the impact of new technologies on work. Social Indicators Research159: 821–841. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02768-7.
28.
FerreiraMDe GripAVan der VeldenR (2018) Does informal learning at work differ between temporary and permanent workers?Evidence from 20 OECD countries Labour Economics55: 1840.
29.
FouargeDDe GripASmitsW, et al. (2012) Flexible contracts and human capital investments. De Economist160: 177–195.
30.
GarneroA (2021) The impact of collective bargaining on employment and wage inequality: evidence from a new taxonomy of bargaining systems. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(2): 185–202. DOI: 10.1177/0959680120920771.
31.
GoldinCKatzLF (2007) The Race between Education and Technology: The Evolution of Us Educational Wage Differentials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
GoosMManningASalomonsA (2014) Explaining job polarization: routine-biased technological change and offshoring. The American Economic Review104(8): 2509–2526.
33.
HaapanalaHMarxIParolinZ (2023) Robots and unions: The moderating effect of organized labour on technological unemployment. Economic and Industrial Democracy44(3): 827–852.
34.
HaslbergerM (2021) Routine-biased technological change does not always lead to polarisation: evidence from 10 OECD countries 1995–2013. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility74: 100–623.
35.
HershbeinBKahnL (2018) Do recessions accelerate routine-biased technological change?Evidence from Vacancy Postings American Economic Review108(7): 173–772.
36.
KeuneMPedaciM (2020) Trade union strategies against precarious work: common trends and sectoral divergence in the EU. European Journal of Industrial Relations26(2): 139–155.
37.
KlenertDFernández-MacíasEAntónJI (2023) Do robots really destroy jobs?Economic and Industrial Democracy44(1): 280–316.
38.
KostølFBSvarstadE (2023) Trade unions and the process of technological change. Labour Economics84(2023): 102386.
39.
KristalT (2020) Why has computerization increased wage inequality? information occupational structural power and wage inequality. Work and Occupations47: 073088842094103. DOI: 10.1177/0730888420941031.
40.
KristalTCohenY (2017) The causes of rising wage inequality: the race between institutions and technology. Socio-Economic Review15(1): 187–212.
41.
KristalTEdlerS (2021) Computers meet politics at wage structure: an analysis of the computer wage premium across rich countries. Socio-Economic Review19(3): 837–868.
42.
LindvallJRuedaD (2014) The insider–outsider dilemma. British Journal of Political Science44(2): 460–475.
43.
MeardiGSimmsMAdamD (2021) Trade unions and precariat in Europe: representative claims. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(1): 41–58.
44.
MeyerBBiegertT (2019) The conditional effect of technological change on collective bargaining coverage. Research & Politics6: 1–9.
45.
MinardiSHornbergCBarbieriP, et al. (2023) The link between computer use and job satisfaction: the mediating role of job tasks and task discretion. British Journal of Industrial Relations1–36. DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12738
46.
MosimannNPontussonJ (2017) Solidaristic unionism and support for redistribution in contemporary Europe. World Politics69(3): 448–492.
47.
OECD (2019) Negotiating Our Way up: Collective Bargaining in a Changing World of Work. Paris: OECD.
48.
OECD (2021) The Role of Firms in Wage Inequality: Policy Lessons from a Large Scale Cross Country Study OECD Publishing. Paris: OECD. DOI: 10.1787/7d9b2208en.
49.
OeschDPiccittoG (2019) The polarization myth: occupational upgrading in Germany Spain Sweden and the UK 1992–2015. Work and Occupations46(4): 441–469.
50.
OeschDRodríguez-MenésJ (2011) Upgrading or polarization? occupational change in Britain Germany Spain and Switzerland 1990–2008. Socio-Economic Review9(3): 503–531.
51.
ParolinZ (2021) Automation occupational earnings trends and the moderating role of organized labor. Social Forces99(3): 921–946.
52.
PassarettaGWolbersMH (2019) Temporary employment at labour market entry in Europe: labour market dualism transitions to secure employment and upward mobility. Economic and Industrial Democracy40(2): 382–408.
53.
PulignanoVMeardiGDoerflingerN (2015) Trade unions and labour market dualisation: a comparison of policies and attitudes towards agency and migrant workers in Germany and Belgium. Work, employment and society29(5): 808–825.
54.
PulignanoVSignorettiA (2016) Union strategies, national institutions and the use of temporary labour in Italian and US plants. British Journal of Industrial Relations54(3): 574–596.
55.
ThelenK (2014) Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
TomelleriA (2021) Temporary jobs and increasing inequality for recent cohorts in Italy. Labour35: 500–537. DOI: 10.1111/labr.12208.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
