This article examines the impact of the economic crisis and its aftermath on collective bargaining, by comparing reactions to austerity policies of trade unions in healthcare and education in Romania. We develop an encompassing theoretical framework that links strategies used by trade unions with power resources, costs and union democracy. In a tight labour market generated by the massive emigration of doctors, unions in healthcare have successfully deployed their resources to advance their interests and obtain significant wage increases and better working conditions. We also show that in the aftermath of the crisis, healthcare trade unions have redefined their strategies and adopted a more militant stance based on a combination of local strikes, strike threats and temporary alliances with various stakeholders. By comparison, we find that unions in the education sector have adopted less effective strategies built around negotiations with governments combined with national-level militancy.
AdăscălițeiDGugaȘ (2018) International actors and trade unions during postsocialism and after: The case of Romania. Employee Relations. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01–2017–0017
CrowleyS (2004) Explaining labor weakness in post-communist Europe: Historical legacies and comparative perspective. East European Politics & Societies18(3): 394–429.
DornescuVManeaT (2013) Migratia Medicilor Români: Dimensiuni socio-demografice și economice. Revista de Economie Sociala3(1): 121–138.
10.
FregeCMKellyJ (2004) Union strategies in comparative context. In: FregeCMKellyJ (eds) Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–44.
11.
GalanAOlsavskyVVladescuV (2011) Emergent Challenge of health professional emigration: Romania’s accession to the EU. In: MatthiasWMaierCGlinosIet al. (eds) Health Professional Mobility and Health Systems: Evidence from Countries17. Brussels: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, pp. 449–479.
GanzM (2000) Resources and resourcefulness: Strategic capacity in the unionization of California agriculture, 1959–1966. American Journal of Sociology105(4): 1003–1062.
15.
Gumbrell-McCormickRHymanR (2013) Trade Unions in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
GugaStefan. 2015. “Impactul modificarilor legislative asupra relatiilor colective de munca pe timp de criza. O analiza sociologica.” In Analiza impactului noii legislatii a dialogului social adoptate in 2011, edited by StefanGugaCameliaConstantin. Bucharest: Asociatia Conect.
17.
HellerP (1999) The Labor of Development: Workers and the Transformation of Capitalism in Kerala, India. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
HirschmanAO (1945) National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
JarleyP (2005) Unions as social capital: Renewal through a return to the logic of mutual aid?Labor Studies Journal29(4): 1–26.
25.
KaminskaMEKahancováM (2011) Emigration and labour shortages: An opportunity for trade unions in the new member states?European Journal of Industrial Relations17(2): 189–203.
26.
LaaksoMTaageperaR (1979) Effective number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies12(1): 3–27.
27.
LévesqueCMurrayG (2003) Le Pouvoir Syndical Dans l’économie Mondiale. La Revue de l’IRES41(1): 1–28.
28.
MeardiG (2011) Social Failures of EU Enlargement: A Case of Workers Voting with Their Feet. New York: Routledge.
MoldovanAWalleS (2013) Gifts or bribes?Public Integrity15(4): 385–402.
33.
MunteanA (2011) Trade unions and labour relations in post-communist Romania. PhD Thesis, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest.
34.
OffeCWiesenthalH (1980) Two logics of collective action. Political Power and Social Theory1: 67–115.
35.
OstD (2000) Illusory corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal tripartism and postcommunist class identities. Politics & Society28(4): 503–530.
SchmidtWMüllerARamos-VielbaIet al. (2019) Austerity and public sector trade union power: Before and after the crisis. European Journal of Industrial Relations25(2): 129–145.
40.
SilverBJ (2003) Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
StanS (2012) Neither commodities nor gifts: Post-socialist informal exchanges in the Romanian health care system. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute18(1): 65–82.
42.
StanSErneR (2016) Is migration from Central and Eastern Europe an opportunity for trade unions to demand higher wages? Evidence from the Romanian health sector. European Journal of Industrial Relations22(2): 167–183.
43.
StoiciuV (2012) Austerity and Structural Reforms in Romania: Severe Measures, Questionable Economic Results and Negative Social Consequences. Berlin: Friedrich-ebert-stiftung. Available at: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id-moe/09310.pdf
44.
SzaboI (2013) Labor politics in a weak institutional environment: Structural power and strategic alliances of health care and education employees in East Central Europe. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2667155. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2667155
45.
VargaMFreyberg-InanA (2015) Post-communist state measures to thwart organized labor: The case of Romania. Economic and Industrial Democracy36(4): 677–699.
46.
VasileV (2013) Romania: A country under permanent public sector reform. In: Vaughan-WhiteheadD (ed.) Public Sector Shock: The Impact of Policy Retrenchment in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 449–510.
