This article argues that democratic decision-making improves trade union strength and
success during policy-making. Elitism and lack of democracy, on the other hand,
diminish unions' strength. Elitism, in this respect, remains entrenched in
trade union structures during internal decision-making. The author's
argument is twofold: both the ability of trade union leaders to develop links with
the rank-and-file and reduce hierarchy during internal decision-making influence the
strength of organizations. Both factors help carry the spontaneous and local demands
of union members onto the national agenda. This article assigns a crucial role to
unions and interest groups in providing a system of interest representation
sensitive to interests that might go unacknowledged in a system whose only devices
of representation were political parties and representatives with territorial
constituencies. However, this article does not idealize groups but rather questions
their ability to represent the interests of their members. The author tests the
plausibility of these hypotheses with data from interviews with trade union
confederation and federation representatives from Romania and Poland. This article
concludes that organizational democracy positively affects union success.
Avdagic, S. (2003) ‘Shaping the Paths to Labour Weakness: The
Interplay of Political Strategies and Institutional Structures in Post-Communist
Central Eastern Europe’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Central European
University, Budapest.
2.
Anderson, C.W.
(1979) ‘Political Design and the Representation
of Interests’, pp. 271–297 in
P.C. Schmitter
and
G. Lehmbruch
(eds) Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation.
Beverly Hills, CA and London: Sage
.
3.
Baccaro, L.
(2001)
‘Union Democracy Revisited: Decision-Making Procedures in the
Italian Labour Movement’
, Economic and Industrial Democracy22(2):
183–210
.
4.
Baccaro, L.
(2002a) What is Dead and What is Alive in the Theory of
Corporatism, Discussion Paper DP/143/2002.
Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies
.
5.
Baccaro, L.
(2002b)
‘The Construction of “Democratic” Corporatism
in Italy’
, Politics and Society30(2):
327–357
.
6.
Barbash, J.
(1967) American Unions: Structure, Government, and
Politics.
New York: Random House
.
7.
Berman, S.
(1997)
‘Civil Society and Political Institutionalisation’
, American Behavioral Scientist40(5):
562–576
.
8.
Candland, C.
and
R. Sil
(2001) ‘The Politics of Labour in
Late-Industrializing and Post-Socialist Economies: New Challenges in a Global
Age’, pp. 1–31 in
C. Candland
and
R. Sil
(eds) The Politics of Labour in a Global Age.
Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press
.
9.
Carew, A.
(1976) Democracy and Government in European Trade
Unions.
London: George Allen and Unwin
.
10.
Cirtautas, A.M.
and
E. Mokrzycki
(1995) ‘The Articulation and
Institutionalisation of Democracy in Poland’, pp.
108–143 in
C.G.A. Bryant
and
E. Mokrzycki
(eds) Democracy, Civil Society and Pluralism.
Warszawa: IFIS Publishers
.
11.
Cohen, J.
and
J. Rogers
(1992)
‘Secondary Associations and Democratic Governance’
, Politics and Society20(4):
393–472
.
12.
Coposu, C.
(1998) Confessions: Dialogues with Doina Alexandru.
Boulder, CO: East European
Monographs/New York: Columbia
University Press
.
13.
Erbes-Seguin, S.
(1971) Democratie dans les Syndicats [Democracy in the
Syndicates].
Paris: Mouton
.
14.
Eyal, G.
,
I. Szelényi
and
E. Townsley
(1998) Making Capitalism without Capitalists: Class Formation
and Elite Struggles in Post-Communist Central Europe.
London and New York: Verso
.
15.
Fiorito, J.
,
P. Jarley
and
T. Delaney
(1993)
‘National Union Effectiveness’
, Research in the Sociology of Organisations12:
111–137
.
16.
Frege, C.M.
(2002)
‘Understanding Union Effectiveness in Central and Eastern Europe:
Hungary and Slovenia’
, European Journal of Industrial Relations8(1):
53–76
.
17.
Fung, A.
and
E.O. Wright
(2001)
‘Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance’
, Politics and Society29(1):
5–41
.
18.
Galenson, W.
(1998) The World's Strongest Trade Unions: The
Scandinavian Labour Movement.
Westport, CT and London: Quorum Books
.
19.
Griffin, G.
and
P. Fairbrother
(2002) ‘Conclusion: The State of the
Unions’, pp. 238–256 in
P. Fairbrother
and
G. Griffin
(eds) Changing Prospects for Trade Unionism: Comparisons between Six
Countries, Employment and Work Relations in Context Series.
London, New York: Continuum
.
20.
Hammer, T.E.
and
D.L. Wazeter
(1993)
‘Dimensions of Local Union Effectiveness’
, Industrial and Labour Relations Review46(2):
302–319
.
21.
Hausner, J.
(1995) ‘The State Enterprise Pact and the
Potential for Tripartism in Poland’, pp.
105–129 in
R. Kyloh
(ed.) Tripartism on Trial: Tripartite Consultations and Negotiations in
Central and Eastern Europe.
Geneva: International Labour Organization
.
22.
Héthy, L.
(1994) ‘Tripartism in Eastern
Europe’, pp. 312–335 in
R. Hyman
and
A. Ferner
(eds) New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations.
Oxford: Blackwell Business
.
23.
Héthy, L.
and
R. Kyloh
(1995) ‘A Comparative Analysis of Tripartite
Consultations and Negotiations in Central and Eastern
Europe’, pp. 1–40 in
R. Kyloh
(ed.) Tripartism on Trial: Tripartite Consultations and Negotiations in
Central and Eastern Europe.
Geneva: International Labour Organization
.
24.
Hyden, G.
(1997)
‘Civil Society, Social Capital and Development: Dissection of a
Complex Discourse’
, Studies in Comparative International Development32(1):
3–31
.
25.
Jasiecki, K.
(1997) ‘Organizacje pracodawcóow i
przedsiebiorców Polsce [Organisation of Employers and Business Owners
in Poland]’, pp. 23–41 in
J. Wasilewski
(ed.) Zbiorowi aktorzy polskiej polityki [The Polish Political Actors
Together].
Warsaw: ISP PAN
.
26.
Kennedy, M.D.
(1992)
‘The Intelligentsia in the Constitution of Civil Societies and
Post-Communist Regimes in Hungary and Poland’
, Theory and Society21:
29–77
.
27.
Kideckel, D.A.
(1999)
‘Storm and Stasis: The Paradox of Labour in Post-Socialist Romania’
, South-East Europe Reviewspecial issue:
107–132
.
28.
Kideckel, D.A.
(2001) ‘Winning the Battles, Losing the War:
Contradictions of Romanian Labour in the Postcommunist
Transformation’, in
S. Crowley
and
D. Ost
(eds) Workers after Workers' States: Labour and Politics in
Postcommunist Eastern Europe.
Lanham, MD and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield
.
29.
Koralewicz, J.
and
E. Wńnuk-Lipińnski
(1985)
‘Visions of Society, Differentiations and Inequalities in the
Collective Consciousness’
, SisyphusV:
145–163
.
30.
Korkut, U.
(2001)
‘The Government and Civil Society Interaction in Hungary in
Crisis Management: The Case of Floods and Pollution in River Tisza‘
, paper presented at the Fourth meeting of Hungarian
Studies, Jyväskylä, Finland, August.
31.
Korkut, U.
(2002a)
‘What Becomes of Robin Hood When He Embraces Power: Weltering
Civil Society in Eastern Europe’
, paper presented at Den Nasjonale Fagkonferansen i Statsvitenskap
[National Conference in Political Science], Solstand Os,
Norway, January.
32.
Korkut, U.
(2002b)
‘The European Union and the Accession Process in Hungary, Poland
and Romania: Is There a Place for Social Dialogue?’
, Perspectives on European Politics and Society3(2):
297–324
.
33.
Korkut, U. (2003) ‘The Relationship between Democratisation and the
Invigoration of Civil Society in Hungary, Poland and Romania’, unpublished
PhD dissertation, Central European University, Budapest.
34.
Korkut, U.
(2005) ‘The Position of Interest Groups in
Eastern European Democracies: Maturing Servicemen or Trojan
Horses?’, pp. 113–132 in
S. Rossteutscher
(ed.) Rescuing Democracy: The Lure of Associative Elixir.
London: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European
Political Science
.
35.
Kubicek, P.
(1999)
‘Organised Labour in Postcommunist States: Will the Western Sun
Set on It, Too?’
, Comparative Politics32(1):
83–102
.
36.
Lange, P.
(1983)
‘Politiche dei redditi e democrazia sindicale in Europa
occidentale [Income Politics and Syndical Democracy in Western Europe]’
, Stato e Mercato9:
425–474
.
37.
LaPalombara, J.
(1964) Interest Groups in the Italian System.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
38.
Linz, J.
and
A. Stepan
(1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation:
Southern Europe, South America, Post-Communist Europe.
Baltimore, MD and London: The Johns Hopkins
University Press
.
39.
Lipski, J.J.
(1985) KOR: A History of the Workers' Defence
Committee in Poland, 1976–1981.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
40.
Martin, R.
and
A. Cristesco-Martin
(1999)
‘Industrial Relations in Transformation: Central and Eastern
Europe in 1998’
, Industrial Relations Journal30(4):
387–404
.
41.
Michels, R.
(1962) Political Parties. A Sociological Study on the
Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy.
New York: The Free Press
.
42.
Mihes, C.
and
G. Casale
(1999) ‘Industrial Relations in
Romania’, pp. 270–288 in
G. Casale
(ed.) Social Dialogue in Central and Eastern Europe.
Budapest: International Labour Office
.
43.
Murillo, V.M.
(2000)
‘From Populism to Neoliberalism: Labour Unions and Market Reforms
in Latin America’
, World Politics52:
135–174
.
44.
Mzyk, K. (1999/2000) ‘Interest Representation – Mission
Impossible? The Case of the Polish Small and Medium Enterprises a Decade after
Transition’, unpublished MA thesis. Central European University, Warsaw.
45.
Nelson, D.N.
(1995) ‘Romania’, in
Z. Báarany
and
I. Völgyes
(eds) The Legacies of Communism in Eastern Europe.
Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins
University Press
.
46.
Orenstein, M.A.
and
L.E. Hale
(2001) ‘Corporatist Renaissance in
Post-Communist Central Europe?’, pp.
258–285 in
C. Candland
and
R. Sil
(eds) The Politics of Labour in a Global Age.
Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press
.
47.
Ost, D.
(2000)
‘Illusionary Corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal Tripartism
and Postcommunist Class Identities’
, Politics and Society28(4):
503–530
.
48.
Ost, D.
(2001) ‘The Weakness of Symbolic Strength:
Labour and Union Identity in Poland, 1989–2000’,
pp. 79–96 in
S. Crowley
and
D. Ost
(eds) Workers after Workers' States: Labour and Politics in
Postcommunist Eastern Europe.
Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
.
49.
Ost, D.
(2002)
‘The Weakness of Strong Social Movements: Models of Unionism in
the East European Context’
, European Journal of Industrial Relations8(1):
33–51
.
50.
Ost, D.
and
S. Crowley
(2001a) ‘Introduction: The Surprise of Labour
Weakness in Postcommunist Society’, pp.
1–12 in
S. Crowley
and
D. Ost
(eds) Workers after Workers' States: Labour and Politics in
Postcommunist Eastern Europe.
Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
.
51.
Ost, D.
and
S. Crowley
(2001b) ‘Conclusion: Making Sense of Labour
Weakness in Postcommunism’, pp.
219–233 in
S. Crowley
and
D. Ost
(eds) Workers after Workers' States: Labour and Politics in
Postcommunist Eastern Europe.
Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
.
52.
Pańków, I.
(2000) ‘Trade Unions and
Politics’, pp. 249–270 in
J. Frentzel-Zagorska
and
J. Wasilewski
(eds) The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in Central and Eastern
Europe.
Warsaw: Institute of Political Studies
.
53.
Pańnków, W.
and
B. Gaciarz
(2001) ‘Industrial Relations in Poland: From
Social Partnershipto Enlightened Paternalism?’, pp.
72–91 in
G. Blazyca
and
R. Rapacki
(eds) Poland into the New Millennium.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
54.
Pateman, C.
(1977) Participation and Democratic Theory.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
55.
Petrescu, C. (2001) ‘From Robin Hood to Don Quixote. Opposition and
Dissent in Communist Romania’, unpublished paper, Central European
University, Budapest.
56.
Riethof, M.
(1999)
‘Labour Involvement in National and Regional Transformation
Process: The Case of Chile’
, Third World Quarterly20(5):
1049–1059
.
57.
Saward, M.
(1994) ‘Democratic Theory and Indices of
Democratisation’, pp. 6–24 in
D. Beetham
(ed.) Defining and Measuring Democracy.
London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: Sage
.
58.
Schmitter, P.
(1979) ‘Still the Century of
Corporatism?’, pp. 7–49 in
P. Schmitter
and
G. Lehmbruch
(eds) Trends towards Corporatism Intermediation.
London: Sage
.
59.
Slomp, H.
,
J. van Hoof
and
H. Moerel
(1996) ‘The Transformation of Industrial
Relations in some Central and Eastern European Countries’,
pp. 337–357 in
J. van Ruysseveldt
and
J. Visser
(eds) Industrial Relations in Europe: Traditions and Transitions.
London: Sage
.
60.
Smolar, A.
(1991) ‘The Polish
Opposition’, pp. 175–253 in
A. Arató
and
F. Fehéer
(eds) Crisis and Reform in Eastern Europe.
New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers
.
61.
Sobotka, E.
(1999) ‘The Role and Functioning of Tripartite
Institutions in Social Dialogue at the National Level in
Poland’, pp. 264–270 in
G. Casale
(ed.) Social Dialogue in Central and Eastern Europe.
Budapest: International Labour Office
.
62.
Stefan, I.
(1995) ‘Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue
in Romania’, pp. 130–145 in
R. Kyloh
(ed.) Tripartism on Trial: Tripartite Consultations and Negotiations in
Central and Eastern Europe.
Geneva: International Labour Organization
.
63.
Stephens Huber, E.
(1980) The Politics of Workers' Participation: The
Peruvian Approach in Comparative Perspective.
New York, London and Toronto: Academic Press
.
64.
Tafel, H.L.
and
D.S. Boniface
(2003)
‘Old Carrots, New Sticks: Explaining Labour Strategies toward
Economic Reform in Eastern Europe and Latin America’
, Comparative Politics35(3):
313–333
.
65.
Tismaneanu, V.
(1992) Reinventing Politics: Eastern Europe from Stalin to
Havel.
New York: The Free Press
.
