Downward flexibility: Who is willing to take an inferior job?

Abstract

Most workers look forward to better jobs across their careers, but in an age of rising inequality and insecurity at work, some are willing to accept an inferior job in order to avoid joblessness. We use the Work Orientations III survey from the 2005 International Social Survey Programme to explore such ‘downward flexibility’ and develop several regression models specified for 19 OECD countries to test hypotheses and explore macro- and individual-level variations. Workers in liberal ‘labour market regimes’ are more tolerant of downward adaptations, in line with evidence that these regimes produce strongly institutionalized norms of flexibility. Tolerance of a worse job is also higher among those with weak labour market positions (low-income respondents, women and young people). Further macro-level analysis suggests that the ‘model’ country with the most downwardly flexible workers would be rich and unequal, with weak unions and low levels of social protection and industrial rights.

Keywords

Deregulation International Social Survey Programme labour market regimes neoliberalism sociology of work welfare regimes work orientations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Avdagic

(2014) Does deregulation work? Reassessing the unemployment effects of employment protection. British Journal of Industrial Relations 53(1): 6–26.

Baker

Glyn

Howell

Schmitt

(2004) Unemployment and labour market institutions: The failure of the empirical case for deregulation. ILO Policy Integration Department working paper no. 43, November. Geneva: International Labour Organization (ILO).

Brooks

Manza

(2008) Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2015) The world factbook. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/

Champion

(2011) Switzerland: A latecomer catching up? In: Clasen

Clegg

(eds) Regulating the Risk of Unemployment: National Adaptations to Post-Industrial Labour Markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–141.

Chung

Mau

(2014) Subjective insecurity and the role of institutions. Journal of European Social Policy 24(4): 303–318.

Chung

Van Oorschot

(2011) Institutions versus market forces: Explaining the employment insecurity of European individuals during (the beginning of) the financial crisis. Journal of European Social Policy 21(4): 287–301.

Dixon

Fullerton

Robertson

(2013) Cross-national differences in workers’ perceived job, labour market, and employment insecurity in Europe: Empirical tests and theoretical extensions. European Sociological Review 29(5): 1053–1067.

Emmenegger

(2011) Ever more liberal? The regulation of job security and working time in Switzerland. In: Trampusch

Mach

(eds) Switzerland in Europe: Continuity and Change in the Swiss Political Economy. New York: Routledge, pp. 124–143.

10.

Emmenegger

Hausermann

Palier

Seeleib-Kaiser

(2012) How rich countries cope with deindustrialization. In: Emmenegger

Hausermann

Palier

Seeleib-Kaiser

(eds) The Age of Dualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 304–320.

11.

Esping-Andersen

(2009) Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare States to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.

12.

Etzioni

(2012) An analytical challenge. Footnotes 40(6): 14–15.

13.

European Commission (2008) Industrial Relations in Europe. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=2535&;langId=en

14.

Freeman

(2008) Labor market institutions around the world. CEP discussion paper no. 844, January. London: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).

15.

Frey

(1997) On the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic work motivation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15(4): 427–439.

16.

Gallie

(2007) Welfare regimes, employment systems and job preference orientations. European Sociological Review 23(3): 279–293.

17.

Grotti

Scherer

(2014) Accumulation of employment instability among partners: evidence from six EU countries. European Sociological Review 30(5): 627–639.

18.

Hakim

(2004) Key Issues in Women’s Work: Female Diversity and the Polarisation of Women’s Employment, 2nd edn. London: Glass House Press.

19.

Hall

Soskice

(eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20.

Heyes

Lewis

(2014) Employment protection under fire: Labour market deregulation and employment in the European Union. Economic and Industrial Democracy 35(4): 587–607.

21.

Hult

Svallfors

(2002) Production regimes and work orientations: A comparison of six western countries. European Sociological Review 18(3): 315–331.

22.

ISSP Research Group (2013) International Social Survey Programme: Work Orientations III – ISSP 2005. Available at: http://zacat.gesis.org/webview/index.jsp?object=http://zacat.gesis.org/obj/fStudy/ZA4350

23.

Kalleberg

(2009) Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review 74(1): 1–22.

24.

Lübke

Erlinghagen

(2014) Self-perceived job insecurity across Europe over time: Does changing context matter? Journal of European Social Policy 24(4): 319–336.

25.

Mirowsky

Ross

(2003) Social Causes of Psychological Distress. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

26.

Mishel

Schmitt

(1996) Beware the US Model: Jobs and Wages in a Deregulated Economy. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

27.

Muffels

RJA

(2008) Flexibility and employment security in Europe: Setting the scene. In: Muffels

RJA

(ed.) Flexibility and Employment Security in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 3–30.

28.

Muffels

RJA

Luijkx

(2006) Globalization and male job mobility in European welfare states. In: Blossfeld

H-P

Mills

Bernardi

(eds) Globalization, Uncertainty and Men’s Careers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 38–72.

29.

Newman

(1999) Falling from Grace: Downward Mobility after the Age of Affluence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

30.

OECD (2013) Employment Outlook 2013. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/oecd-employment-outlook-2013_empl_outlook-2013-en

31.

OECD (2015a) Employment Outlook 2015. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/oecd-employment-outlook-2015_empl_outlook-2015-en

32.

OECD (2015b) Indicators of employment protection. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/oecdindicatorsofemploymentprotection.htm

33.

OECD (2016) Social Expenditure Database. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/social/expenditure.htm

34.

Pierson

(1994) Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Schröder

(2009) Integrating welfare and production typologies: How refinements of the varieties of capitalism approach call for a combination of welfare typologies. Journal of Social Policy 38(1): 19–43.

36.

Steiber

Haas

(2012) Advances in explaining women’s employment patterns. Socio-Economic Review 10(2): 343–367.

37.

Svallfors

(1997) Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review 13(3): 283–304.

38.

Visser

(2015) ICTWSS Database, version 5.0. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS). Available at: www.uva-aias.net/208

39.

Walther

(2006) Regimes of youth transitions: Choice, flexibility and security in young people’s experiences across different European contexts. Young 14(2): 119–139.

40.

Wilthagen

Tros

(2004) The concept of ‘flexicurity’: A new approach to regulating employment and labour markets. Transfer 10(2): 166–186.