This article presents an empirical analysis of the factors associated with trends in labour standards, in EU accession countries, using a new dataset of labour rights. It focuses on ratification of the ILO’s fundamental conventions, EU monitoring and ILO monitoring. It describes the similarities and differences between the two monitoring schemes and evaluates their roles in shaping labour rights. Generalized estimating equation analysis shows that EU monitoring is positively associated with improved labour rights while ILO monitoring is not. The results further indicate that ratification of ILO fundamental Conventions is positively associated with labour rights protection. The article returns to the notion of external governance to suggest possible explanations for these findings.
AlstonP (2004) ‘Core labour standards’ and the transformation of the international labour rights regime. European Journal of International Law15(3): 457–521.
2.
AlstonP (2005) Labour rights as human rights: The not so happy state of the art. In: AlstonP (ed.) Labour Rights as Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–24.
3.
BifflGIsaacJ (2005) Globalization and core labour standard: Compliance problems with ILO Conventions 87 and 98, comparing Australia and other English-speaking countries with EU member states. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations21(3): 405–444.
4.
BlockRRobertsK (2000) A comparison of labour rights in the United States and Canada. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations55(2): 273–307.
5.
BöhningWR (2005) Labour Rights in Crisis: Measuring the Achievement of Fundamental Human Rights in the World of Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BookmanB (2010) The effect of ILO minimum age conventions on child labor and school attendance: Evidence from aggregate and individual-level data. World Development38(5): 679–692.
7.
BörzelT (2010) European governance: Negotiation and competition in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Common Market Studies48(2): 191–219.
8.
CazesSNesporovaA (2003) Labour Markets in Transition: Balancing Flexibility and Security in Central and Eastern Europe. Geneva: ILO.
9.
CharnovitzS (2000) The International Labour Organization in its second century. In: FroweinJAWolfrumR (eds) Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 147–184.
10.
ChigaraB (2007) Latecomers to the ILO and the authorship and ownership of the International Labour Code. Human Rights Quarterly29(3): 706–726.
11.
CingranelliDLRichardsDL (2010) The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset. Available at: http://www.humanrightsdata.org.
12.
CookLJ (2010) More rights, less power: Labor standards and labor markets in East European post-communist states. Studies in Comparative International Development45(2): 170–197.
13.
CopelandP (2012) EU enlargement, the clash of capitalisms and the European social model. Comparative European Politics10(4): 476–504.
14.
CrowleyS (2004) Explaining labor weakness in post-communist Europe: Historical legacies and comparative perspective. East European Politics and Societies18(3): 394–429.
15.
CuyversLVan Den BulckeD (2007) The quantification of respect for selected core labour standards: Towards a social development index. In: KuceraD (ed.) Qualitative Indicators of Labour Standards. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 145–183.
16.
ElliotKAFreemanRB (2003) Can Labor Standards Improve under Globalization?Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
17.
ErenO (2008) The continuation of ILO principles in the 21st century through the compliance pull of core labor rights. Journal of Workplace Rights13(3): 303–335.
FarrellM (2005) EU external relations: Exporting the EU model of governance. European Foreign Affairs Review10(4): 451–462.
20.
FergeZJuhászG (2004) Accession and social policy. Journal of European Social Policy14(3): 233–251.
21.
FiltenborgMGanzleSJohanssonE (2002) An alternative theoretical approach to EU foreign policy: Network governance and the case of the Northern Dimension Initiative. Cooperation and Conflict37(4): 387–407.
22.
FinnemoreMSikkinkK (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization52(4): 887–917.
23.
GrabbeH (2002) European Union conditionality and the Acquis Communautaire. International Political Science Review23(2): 249–268.
24.
GurowitzA (2006) The diffusion of international norms: Why identity matters. International Politics43(3): 305–341.
25.
HartlappM (2007) On enforcement, management and persuasion: Different logics of implementation policy in the EU and the ILO. Journal of Common Market Studies45(3): 653–674.
26.
HelferL (2008) Monitoring compliance with unratified treaties: The ILO experience. Law and Contemporary Problems71(1): 193–218.
JepsenMSerranoA (2005) The European social model: An exercise in deconstruction. Journal of European Social Policy15(3): 231–245.
30.
KleinmanM (2002) A European Welfare State? European Union Social Policy in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
31.
KuceraD (2007) Measuring trade union rights by violations of these rights. In: KuceraD (ed.) Qualitative Indicators of Labour Standards. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 145–183.
32.
LavenxS (2004) EU external governance in a wider Europe. Journal of European Public Policy11(4): 680–700.
33.
MannersI (2002) Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms?Journal of Common Market Studies40(2): 235–258.
MaupainF (2009) New foundation or new façade? The ILO and the 2008 Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization. European Journal of International Law20(3): 823–852.
36.
MeardiG (2007) More voice after more exit? Unstable industrial relations in Central and Eastern Europe. Industrial Relations Journal38(6): 503–523.
37.
MoranTH (2002) Beyond Sweatshops: Foreign Direct Investment and Globalization in Developing Nations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
38.
MosleyLUnoS (2007) Racing to the bottom or climbing to the top? Economic globalization and collective labor rights. Comparative Political Studies40: 923–950.
39.
NovitzT (2009) Legal power and normative sources in the field of social policy: Normative power Europe at work? In: OrbieJ (ed.) Europe’s Global Role. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 139–157.
40.
O’ConnorJ (2005) Policy coordination, social indicators and the social-policy agenda in the European Union. Journal of European Social Policy15(4): 345–361.
41.
OrbieJKerremansB (2009) The social dimension of European trade policies. European Foreign Affairs Review14(5): 629–641.
42.
OstD (2009) The end of postcommunism: Trade unions in Eastern Europe’s future. East European Politics and Societies23(1): 13–33.
43.
PridhamG (2008) The EU’s political conditionality and post-accession tendencies: Comparisons from Slovakia and Latvia. Journal of Common Market Studies46(2): 365–387.
44.
RisseT (2004) Global governance and communicative action. Government and Opposition39(2): 288–313.
45.
SchimmelfennigF (2007) European regional organizations, political conditionality, and democratic transformation in Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies21(1): 126–141.
46.
SchimmelfennigFSedelmeierU (2005) Introduction: Conceptualizing the Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. In: SchimmelfennigFSedelmeierU (eds) The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–29.
47.
StallingsB (2010) Globalization and labor in four developing regions: An institutional approach. Studies in Comparative International Development45(2): 127–150.
48.
StandingG (2008) The ILO: An agency for globalization?Development and Change39(3): 355–384.
49.
StrangDChangP (1993) The International Labour Organization and the welfare state: Institutional effects on national welfare spending, 1960–80. International Organization47(2): 235–262.
50.
TajgmanDCurtisK (2000) Freedom of Association: A User’s Guide. Geneva: ILO.
51.
TaylorR (2002) A useful go-between? The key role of the ILO in global governance. New Economy9(2): 87–90.
52.
TomkaB (2006) East Central Europe and the European social policy model: A long-term view. East European Quarterly40(2): 135.
53.
TownsA (2012) Norms and social hierarchies: Understanding policy diffusion. International Organization66(2): 179–209.
54.
TulmetsE (2005) The introduction of the OMC in the European enlargement policy. European Political Economy Review3(1): 54–90.
Vaughan-WhiteheadD (2003) EU Enlargement Versus Social Europe: The Uncertain Future of the European Social Model. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
58.
VisskirchenA (2005) The standard setting and monitoring activity of the ILO: Legal questions and practical experience. International Labour Review144(3): 252–287.
59.
VoskoL (2007) Precarious part-time in Australia and in transnational labour regulation: The gendered limits of SER-centrism. Labour and Industry17(3): 45–70.
60.
WaddingtonJ (2005) Trade unions and the defence of the European Social Model. Industrial Relations Journal36(6): 518–540.
61.
WagenerH (2002) The welfare state in transition economies and accession to the EU. West European Politics25(2): 152–174.
62.
WincottD (2003) The idea of the European social model: Limits and paradoxes of Europeanization. In: FeatherstoneKRadaelliC (eds) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 279–302.
63.
WonikK (2010) The ratification of ILO Conventions and the provision of unemployment benefits: An empirical analysis. International Social Security Review63(1): 37–55.
64.
WoolfsonC (2006) Working environment and ‘soft law’ in the post-communist new member states. Journal of Common Market Studies44(1): 195–215.
65.
ZornC (2001) Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data: A review with applications. American Journal of Political Science45(2): 470–490.
