Roughly 10 million European employees are potentially affected by some 200 transnational texts concluded within multinational companies. Unlike other forms of social dialogue with legal effects determined by the Treaty, transnational collective agreements enjoy no legal certainty as to their enforcement. This is often considered a virtue, since autonomous arrangements entered into by the parties could be seen as an expression of a voluntary system of European industrial relations. This article discusses the plausibility of such a view, also taking into account Commission proposal to draft an ‘optional legal framework’ aimed at conferring a more definite binding character on transnational agreements.
AlesE (2009a) La contrattazione collettiva transnazionale tra passato, presente e futuro. Giornale di diritto del lavoro e di relazioni industriali29(3): 551–570.
2.
AlesE (2009b) La négociation collective transnationale en Europe: nécessité d’une initiative législative de l’UE. Revue Internationale du Travail148(1–2): 159–174.
3.
AlesEEngblomSJaspersTLaulomSSciarraSSobczakAValdes Dal-RéF (2006) Transnational Collective Bargaining: Past, Present and Future. Final Report. Brussels: European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
4.
BéD (2008) A report on the European Commission initiative for a European framework for transnational collective bargaining. In: PapadakisK (ed.) Cross-border Social Dialogue and Agreements: An Emerging Global Industrial Relations Framework?Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 221–235.
5.
BercussonB (1992) Maastricht: A fundamental change in European labour law, Industrial Relations Journal23(3): 177–190.
6.
BercussonB (2008) Implementation and monitoring of cross-border agreements: The potential role of cross-border collective industrial action. In: PapadakisK (ed.) Cross-border Social Dialogue and Agreements: An Emerging Global Industrial Relations Framework?Geneva: International Labour Office, International Institute for Labour Studies, 131–157.
7.
BranchA (2005) The evolution of the european social dialogue towards greater autonomy: Challenges and potential benefits. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations21(2): 321–346.
8.
European Commission (2005) Commission Communication on the Social Agenda. COM (2005) 33 Final of 9.2.2005.
9.
European Commission (2008) Commission staff working document: The role of transnational company agreements in the context of increasing international integration. SEC/2008/2155.
EPSU (2009) Procedure for Negotiations at Multinational Company Level. Available at: http://www.epsu.org/a/6136.
12.
ETUC (2006) The coordination of collective bargaining in 2006. Resolution adopted by Executive Committee, 5–6December2005. Available at: http://www.etuc.org/a/1847.
13.
GennardJ (2009) Development of transnational collective bargaining in Europe. Employee Relations31(4): 341–346.
JagodzińskiR (forthcoming) European Works Councils and transnational company agreements – Balancing on the line between effective consultation or transgression of competences to be published in a collected book by S. Clauwert, V. Glassner, R. Jagodzinski, I. Schoemann, G. Boni and T. Jaspers for the ETUI, Brussels.
16.
Kahn-FreundO (1954) Legal framework. In: FlandersACleggH (eds) The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 42–127.
17.
Kahn-FreundO (1979) Labour Relations: Heritage and Adjustment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
KellerB (2007) An optional framework for transnational collective bargaining: Old wine in new bottles or a major breakthrough? In: JacobiOJepsenMKellerBWeissM (eds) Social Embedding and the Integration of Markets. An Opportunity for Transnational Trade Union Action or an Impossible Task?Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, 179–191.
19.
Lo FaroA (2000) Regulating Social Europe. Reality and Myth of Collective Bargaining in the EC Legal Order. Oxford: Hart.
20.
MarginsonP (2008) The transnational dimension to collective bargaining in a European context. Paper to an ETUI/GURN/ILO Workshop on Collective Bargaining in Global Context, Brussels.
21.
MarginsonPMeardiG (2009) Big players, different rules? Multinationals and collective bargaining in Europe. Paper to the SASE Annual Meeting, Paris.
22.
MüllerTPlatzerHRübS (2011) European collective agreements at company level and the relationship between EWCs and trade unions: Lessons from the metal sector. Transfer17(2): 217–228.
23.
SchoemannISobczakAVossEWilkeP (2008) Codes of Conduct and International Framework Agreements: New Forms of Governance at Company Level. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications.
24.
SciarraS (2010a) Transnational and European ways forward for collective bargaining. In: Vänbok till Ronnie Eklund. Uppsala: Iustus Förlag, 529–550.
25.
SciarraS (2010b) Collective exit strategies. New ideas in transnational labour law. Jean MonnetWorking Paper No. 4/10, available at: http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jean-mon-net/papers/10/100401.html Republished in DavidovGLangilleB (eds) (2011) The Idea of Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
SmismansS (2008) The European social dialogue in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Public Policy28(1): 161–180.
27.
StreeckW (1996) Neo-voluntarism: A new European social policy regime? In: MarksGScharpfFSchmitterPStreeckW (eds) Governance in the European Union. London: SAGE, 64–94.
28.
TelljohannV (2005) The EWC: A role beyond the EC Directive?Transfer11(1): 81–96.
29.
TelljohannVda CostaIMüllerTRehfeldtUZimmerR (2009) European and International framework agreements: New tools of transnational industrial relations. Transfer15(3–4): 505–525.
30.
UNICE (2005) Commission social policy agenda must be consistent with the growth and employment strategy. Press release, 9February.
31.
Van HoekAHendrickxF (2009) International Private Law Aspects and Dispute Settlement Related to Transnational Company Agreements. Final Report to the European Commission. Available at: ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=4815&langId=en.
