The Framework agreements on Telework and Work-related stress present unique challenges to our understanding of the European social dialogue, given that they were the first European inter-sectoral collective agreements to be implemented via ‘soft’ means rather than legally binding directives. Their implementation and substantive effects were in practice piecemeal; this implies a retreat of the European social dialogue as a viable means of regulating social Europe.
Clauwaert S. and Harger S. ( 2003) Analysis of the implementation of the parental leave Directive in the EU Member States, ETUI Report No.66, Brussels, ETUI.
2.
De La Porte C and Pochet P (eds) (2002) Building Social Europe Through the Open Method of Coordination. New York: Peter Lang.
3.
Deakin S. and Koukiadaki A. ( 2008) Diffusion of EU-level Norms through Reflexive Governance Mechanisms? The Implementation of the EU Framework agreement on Telework in Five Member States. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
4.
Degryse C. ( 2000) European Social Dialogue: a mixed picture. ETUI DWP2000.01.02, Brussels , ETUI.
5.
Dølvik JE ( 1999) An emerging island? ETUC, Social Dialogue and the Europeanisation of the trade unions in the 1990s, Brussels , ETUI.
6.
Ertel M., Stilijanow U., Iavicoli S., Natali E., Jain A. and Leka S. ( 2010) European social dialogue on psychosocial risks at work: Benefits and challenges. European Journal of Industrial Relations16(2): 169-183.
7.
European Commission (2008) Report on the implementation of the European social partners’ Framework agreement on Telework, Brussels.
8.
European Social Partners - ETUC, Unice, Ueapme, Ceep (2006) Implementation of the European Framework agreement on Telework. Report by the European Social Partners, Brussels.
9.
European Social Partners - ETUC, Business Europe, Ueapme, Ceep (2008) Implementation of the European Autonomous Framework agreement on Work-related Stress, Brussels.
10.
Falkner G. ( 1998) EU Social Policy in the 1990s: Towards a Corporatist Policy Community. London: Routledge .
11.
Falkner G., Treib O., Hartlapp M. and Leiber S. ( 2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Gold M. ( 1998) Social partnership at the European level: Initiatives, problems and implications for member states. In: Hine D and Kassim H (eds) Beyond the Market. London: Routledge .
13.
Hall M. ( 1994) Industrial relations and the social dimension of European integration: Before and after Maastricht . In: Hyman R and Ferner A (eds) New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations . Oxford: Blackwell.
14.
Jacobi O. and Kirton-Darling J. ( 2005) Creating perspectives, negotiating social Europe . Transfer11(3): 333-345.
15.
Jacobs A. and Ojeda Avilés A. ( 1999) The European social dialogue: Some legal issues . In: Bercusson B, Blanke T, Bruun N, Jacobs A, Ojeda Aviles A , Veneziani B and Clauewaert S (eds) A Legal Framework for European Industrial Relations. Brussels: ETUI.
16.
Jacobsson K. and Schmid H. ( 2002) Real Integration or just Formal Adaptation? On the Implementation of the National Action Plans for Employment. In: De La Porte C and Pochet P (eds) Building Social Europe Through the Open Method of Coordination. New York: Peter Lang.
17.
Jensen CS, Madsen JS and Due J. ( 1999) Phases and dynamics in the development of EU industrial relations regulation. Industrial Relations Journal30(2): 118-134.
18.
Keller B. ( 2003) Social dialogues: The state of the art a decade after Maastricht. Industrial Relations Journal34(5): 411-429.
19.
Keller B. and Bansbach M. ( 2001) Social dialogues: Tranquil past, troubled present and uncertain future. Industrial Relations Journal32(5): 419-434.
20.
Keller B and Platzer H-W (eds) (2003) Industrial Relations and European Integration: Trans- and Supranational Developments and Prospects. Aldershot: Ashgate.
21.
Kim H. ( 1999) Constructing European collective bargaining. Economic and Industrial Democracy20(3): 393-426.
22.
Larsen T. and Andersen S. ( 2007) Autonomous Framework agreements: A new way of regulating Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations13(2): 181-198.
23.
Léonard E. ( 2008): European Sectoral Social Dialogue: An Analytical Framework . European Journal of Industrial Relations14(4): 401-19.
24.
Pochet P. ( 2007) European social dialogue between hard and soft law. Paper to the EUSA Tenth Biennial International Conference, Montreal, May.
25.
Pochet P., Peeters A., Léonard E. and Perin E. ( 2009) Dynamics of European sectoral social dialogue. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
26.
Prosser T. ( 2006) Is the ‘new phase’ of the European Social Dialogue the development of an autonomous and effective form of social dialogue?Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations, no. 82, IRRU, Warwick.
27.
Smismans S. ( 2008) The European social dialogue in the shadow of hierarchy . Journal of Public Policy28(1): 161-180.
28.
Streeck W. ( 1994) European social policy after Maastricht: The ‘social dialogue’ and ‘subsidiarity’. Economic and Industrial Democracy15: 151-177.
29.
Visser J. and Martin NR ( 2008) Expert report on the implementation of the European Social Partner’s Framework agreement on Telework, Brussels .
30.
Weber S. ( 2010) Sectoral social dialogue at EU level: Recent results and implementation challenges. Transfer16(4): 489-507.
31.
Welz C. ( 2008) The European Social Dialogue under Articles 138 and 139 of the EC Treaty: Actors, Processes, Outcomes. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
