This article addresses the flexicurity outcomes of sectoral collective bargaining in the Netherlands. Dutch experience — presented as a model by the European Commission — proves not to be a case of ‘one size fits all’. Taking an institutionalist but firm-centred perspective, our analysis links the flexicurity policy debate to the theoretical analyses of ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ (VoC), which also stress various institutional constellations that can lead to equally optimal outcomes. In contrast to the core argument of the VoC perspective that diversity between institutional regimes is persistent, we find convergence across sectors over time. However, sectoral differences in the negotiated flexicurity balance remain apparent.
Andersen, S.K. and Mailand, M. ( 2005) ‘The Danish Flexicurity Model: The Role of the Collective Bargaining System’, FAOS paper compiled for the Danish Ministry of Employment, Copenhagen .
2.
Ben-Shahar, O. and Pottow, J.A.E. ( 2006) ‘On the Stickiness of Default Rules’ , Florida State University Law Review33: 651-82.
3.
Bertola, G., Boeri, T. and Cazes, S. ( 2000) ‘Employment Protection in Industrialised Countries: The Case for New Indicators’, International Labour Review139: 57-72.
4.
Blanchard, O. and Tirole, J. ( 2004) ‘The Optimal Design of Unemployment Insurance and Employment Protection: A First Pass’, NBER Working Paper 10443, Cambridge.
5.
Booth, A. ( 1995) The Economics of the Trade Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bovenberg, A.L. and Wilthagen, T. ( 2008) ‘On the Road to Flexicurity: Dutch Proposals for a Pathway towards Better Transition Security and Higher Labour Market Mobility’ , European Journal of Social Security10(4): 325-46.
7.
EC (2007) Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and Better Jobs through Flexibility and Security . Brussels: European Commission .
8.
Faith, R.L. and Reid, J.D. ( 1987) ‘An Agency Theory of Unionism’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization8: 39-60.
9.
Ferner, A. and Hyman, R. ( 1998) Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell .
10.
Freeman, R.B. and Medoff, J.L. ( 1984) What Do Unions Do?New York : Basic Books.
11.
Goudswaard, A. ( 2003) Flexibele arbeid - duurzame arbeid? De stand van zaken na 20 jaar flexibilisering van arbeid. Hoofddorp : TNO Arbeid.
12.
Hall, P.A. and Gingerich, D.W. ( 2004) ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Analysis’, Max Planck Institute Discussion Paper 04/5, Cologne.
13.
Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. ( 2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Hancké, B., Rhodes, M. and Thatcher, M. ( 2007) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Harcourt, M. and Wood, G. ( 2007) ‘The Importance of Employment Protection for Skill Development in Coordinated Market Economies’, European Journal of Industrial Relations13(2): 141-59.
16.
Houwing, H., Verhulp, E. and Visser, J. ( 2007) ‘The Netherlands’, in B. Caruso and S. Sciarra (eds) Flexibility and Security in Temporary Work: A Comparative and European Debate , pp. 59-77. Catania: Centro Studi di Diritto del Lavoro Europeo ‘Massimo D’Antona’ .
17.
Ibsen, C.L. and Mailand, M. ( 2009) Flexicurity and Collective Bargaining: Balancing Acts across Sectors and Countries. Copenhagen: Faos Forskningsnotat102.
18.
Katz, H.C. and Darbishire, O. ( 2002) Converging Divergences: Worldwide Changes in Employment Systems. Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press.
19.
Lindbeck, A. and Snower, D. ( 2002) ‘The Insider-outsider Theory: A Survey’ , IZA Discussion Paper 534, Bonn.
20.
Michelotti, M. and Nyland, C. ( 2008) ‘Varieties of Capitalism and Diversity in Labour Standards Regulation: The Case of Italy’, European Journal of Industrial Relations14(2): 177-95.
21.
Mills, M., Blossfeld, H.-P., Buchholtz, S., Hofacker, D., Bernardi, F. and Hofmeister, H. ( 2008) ‘Converging Divergences? An International Comparison of the Impact of Globalization on Industrial Relations and Employment Careers’ , International Sociology23(4): 561-95.
22.
Oecd (2004) Employment Outlook 2004. Paris: OECD.
23.
Rubery, J. and Grimshaw, D. ( 2003) The Organization of Employment: An International Perspective . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
24.
Schreuder, K. and Tijdens, K. ( 2004) ‘Codeboek Ducadam Dataset - een statistisch bestand van de FNV CAO Databank’, AIAS Working Paper no. 24, Amsterdam.
25.
SZW (2007) Jaarrapportage ontslagstatistiek 2006. Den Haag: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.
26.
Traxler, F. ( 1995) ‘Farewell to Labour Market Associations? Organised versus Disorganized Decentralization as a Map for Industrial Relations’ , in C. Crouch and F. Traxler (eds) Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future, pp. 3-19. Aldershot: Avebury .
27.
Visser, J. ( 2005) ‘Beneath the Surface of Stability: New and Old Modes of Governance in European Industrial Relations’, European Journal of Industrial Relations11(3): 287-306.
28.
Visser, J. ( 2006) ‘Union Membership Statistics in 24 Countries’ , Monthly Labour Review, January, pp. 38-49.
29.
Wilthagen, T., Tros, F. and van Lieshout, H. ( 2003) ‘Towards ‘‘Flexicurity’’: Balancing Flexibility and Security in EU Member States’, paper to the IIRA World Congress, September, Berlin.
