Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-5
Generalized regression neural network modeling based on inverse Duhem operator and adaptive sliding mode control for hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators
A dynamic generalized regression neural network model based on inverse Duhem operator is proposed to characterize the rate-dependent hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators. As hysteresis is multi-valued mapping, and traditional neural network can only model the system with one-to-one mapping. An inverse Duhem operator is proposed to extract the dynamic property of the hysteresis. Moreover, it can transform the multi-valued mapping of the hysteresis into a one-to-one mapping to suit the input of neural network. In order to compensate the effect of the hysteresis in piezoelectric actuator, the adaptive sliding mode controller with a feedforward hysteresis compensator is developed for the tracking control of the piezoelectric actuator. Experimental results demonstrate superior tracking performance, which validate the practicability and effectiveness of the presented approach.
AnDLiHXuY, et al. Compensation of hysteresis on piezoelectric actuators based on tripartite PI model. Micromachines2018; 9(2): 44.
2.
VijayaMS. Piezoelectric materials and devices: applications in engineering and medical sciences. Mater Today2013; 16(3): 94–95.
3.
NguyenPBChoiSBSongBK. A new approach to hysteresis modelling for a piezoelectric actuator using Preisach model and recursive method with an application to open-loop position tracking control. Sens Actuat A2018; 270: 136–152.
4.
HergliKMarouaniHZidiM. Identification of Preisach hysteresis model parameters using genetic algorithms. J King Saud Univ Sci2019; 31(4): 746–752.
5.
MonnorTKanchiangKYimnirunR, et al. Modeling and characterization of hysteresis loops with Preisach hysteron weight modification. Integrat Ferroelectr2016; 175(1): 33–43.
6.
StefanskiFMinorowiczBPerssonJ, et al. Non-linear control of a hydraulic piezo-valve using a generalised Prandtl–Ishlinskii hysteresis model. Mech Syst Signal Pr2017; 82(1): 412–431.
7.
MaJTianLLiY, et al. Hysteresis compensation of piezoelectric deformable mirror based on Prandtl-Ishlinskii model. Optic Commun2018; 416(6): 94–99.
8.
GanMQiaoZLiY. Sliding mode control with perturbation estimation and hysteresis compensator based on Bouc-Wen model in tackling fast-varying sinusoidal position control of a piezoelectric actuator. J Syst Sci Complex2016; 29(2): 367–381.
9.
WangGChenGBaiF. Modeling and identification of asymmetric Bouc–Wen hysteresis for piezoelectric actuator via a novel differential evolution algorithm. Sens Actuat A: Phys2015; 235(11): 105–118.
10.
KimJSKimGW. Hysteresis compensation of piezoresistive carbon nanotube/polydimethylsiloxane composite-based force sensors. Sensors2017; 17(2): 229–240.
11.
IkhouaneF. A survey of the hysteretic Duhem model. Archiv Comput Method Eng2018; 25(4): 965–1002.
12.
Al JanaidehMRakhejaSSuCY. An analytical generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii model inversion for hysteresis compensation in micropositioning control. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech2010; 16(4): 734–744.
13.
Al JanaidehMAljanaidehO. Further results on open-loop compensation of rate-dependent hysteresis in a magnetostrictive actuator with the Prandtl-Ishlinskii model. Mech Syst Signal Pr2018; 104: 835–850.
14.
SolovyovAMSemenovMEMeleshenkoPA, et al. Bouc-Wen model of hysteretic damping. Proced Eng2017; 201: 549–555.
15.
IkhouaneF. A survey of the hysteretic Duhem model. Archiv Comput Method Eng2018; 25(4): 965–1002.
16.
ZhaoXLShenSSuLC, et al. Elman neural network-based identification of rate-dependent hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators. J Intel Mater Syst Struct2020; 31(7): 980–989.
17.
HassaniVTjahjowidodoTDoTN. A survey on hysteresis modeling, identification and control. Mech Syst Signal Pr2014; 49(1–2): 209–233.
18.
Al JanaidehMKrejčíP. Inverse rate-dependent Prandtl-Ishlinskii model for feedforward compensation of hysteresis in a piezomicropositioning actuator. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech2013; 18(5): 1498–1507.
19.
XiaoSLiY. Modeling and high dynamic compensating the rate-dependent hysteresis of piezoelectric actuators via a novel modified inverse Preisach model. IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech2013; 21(5): 1549–1557.
20.
LiangYXuSHongK, et al. Neural network modeling and single-neuron proportional–integral–derivative control for hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators. Measure Control2019; 52(9–10): 1362–1370.
21.
GuGYZhuLM. Modeling of rate-dependent hysteresis in piezoelectric actuators using a family of ellipses. Sens Actuat A2011; 165: 303–309.
22.
LiHYWangJHDuHP, et al. Adaptive sliding mode control for Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy systems and its applications. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst2018; 26(2): 531–542.
23.
SuCYStepanenkoYSvobodaJ, et al. Robust adaptive control of a class of nonlinear systems with unknown backlash-like hysteresis. IEEE Trans Automat Control2002; 45(12): 2427–2432.
24.
ChenXHisayamaT. Adaptive sliding-mode position control for piezo-actuated stage. IEEE Trans Ind Electr2008; 55(11): 3927–3934.
25.
ColemanBHodgdonM. A Constitutive relation for rate-independent hysteresis in ferromagnetically soft materials. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 1986; 24(6): 897–919.
26.
WangQQSuCYTanYH. On the control of plants with hysteresis: overview and a Prandtl-Ishlinskii hysteresis based control approach. Acta Automatica Sinica2005; 1(31): 92–104.
27.
MishraJPXuQSYuXH, et al. Precision position tracking for piezoelectric-driven motion system using continuous third-order sliding mode control. IEEE-ASME Trans Mech2018; 23(4): 1521–1531.
28.
GuGYZhuLMSuCY, et al. Motion control of piezoelectric positioning stages: modeling, controller design, and experimental evaluation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech2013; 18(5): 1459–1471.
