Nonsmooth control based on finite-time disturbance estimator for the translational oscillator with a rotational actuator system with nonvanishing disturbances
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2022
Nonsmooth control based on finite-time disturbance estimator for the translational oscillator with a rotational actuator system with nonvanishing disturbances
In this article, the stabilization and disturbance estimation of the translational oscillator with a rotational actuator with nonvanishing disturbances are considered. Different from existing methods, a disturbance estimator is designed to eliminate the effects of unexpected external disturbances. As far as we know, this article presents the first finite-time disturbance-estimator-based nonsmooth control scheme for the translational oscillator with a rotational actuator system. Specifically, first, a series of changes of coordinates is made for the model of the translational oscillator with a rotational actuator system. Then, a disturbance estimator is presented to estimate uncertain disturbances and a nonsmooth control scheme is designed to ensure the convergence of all the states. Furthermore, rigorous theoretical analysis is given. Finally, simulation tests are carried out and the obtained results demonstrate that the designed approach exhibits better control performance and stronger robustness than the existing methods.
BuppRTBernsteinDSCoppolaVT. A benchmark problem for nonlinear control design. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control1998; 8(4–5): 307–310.
2.
SheJZhangALaiX, et al. Global stabilization of 2-DOF underactuated mechanical systems—an equivalent-input-disturbance approach. Nonlinear Dynam2012; 69(1): 495–509.
3.
NazrullaSKhalilHK. Robust stabilization of non-minimum phase nonlinear systems using extended high-gain observers. IEEE Trans Automat Control2011; 56(4): 802–813.
4.
MobayenS. A novel global sliding mode control based on exponential reaching law for a class of underactuated systems with external disturbances. J Comput Nonlinear Dynam2016; 11(2): 021011.
5.
OuyangHTianZYuL, et al. Adaptive tracking controller design for double-pendulum tower cranes. Mech Mach Theory2020; 153: 103980.
6.
ZhangMZhangYOuyangH, et al. Adaptive integral sliding mode control with payload sway reduction for 4-DOF tower crane systems. Nonlinear Dynam2020; 99: 2727–2741.
7.
GuoWLiuD. Nonlinear dynamic surface control for the underactuated translational oscillator with rotating actuator system. IEEE Access2019; 7: 11844–11853.
8.
CelaniF. Output regulation for the TORA benchmark via rotational position feedback. Automatica2011; 47(3): 584–590.
9.
GaoBXuJZhaoJ, et al. Stabilizing control of an underactuated 2-dimensional TORA with only rotor angle measurement. Asian J Control2013; 15(5): 1477–1488.
10.
XuKWuXMaM, et al. Energy-based output feedback control of the underactuated 2DTORA system with saturated inputs. Trans Inst Meas Control2020; 42(14): 2822–2829.
11.
WuXXuKMaM, et al. Output feedback control for an underactuated benchmark system with bounded torques. Asian J Control2021; 23(3): 1466–1475.
12.
GaoBBaoYXieJ, et al. Passivity-based control of two-dimensional translational oscillator with rotational actuator. Trans Inst Meas Control2014; 36(1): 111–118.
13.
SunNWuYFangY, et al. Nonlinear stabilization control of multiple-RTAC systems subject to amplitude-restricted actuating torques using only angular position feedback. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2017; 64(4): 3084–3094.
14.
WuXGuM. Adaptive control of the TORA system with partial state constraint. Trans Ins Meas Control2019; 41(4): 1172–1177.
15.
WuYSunNFangY. An increased nonlinear coupling motion controller for underactuated multi-TORA systems: theoretical design and hardware experimentation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2019; 49(6): 1186–1193.
16.
SunNWuYFangY, et al. Nonlinear continuous global stabilization control for underactuated RTAC systems: design, analysis, and experimentation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2017; 22(2): 1104–1115.
17.
ChengKZhangYLiL, et al. Adaptive sliding mode control of inclined TORA system. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Chinese control conference, Guangzhou, China, 27–30 July 2019, pp.797–802. New York: IEEE.
18.
ChenZWuXOuX, et al. Sliding mode control of the RTAC system. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 7th data driven control and learning systems conference, Enshi, China, 25–27 May 2018, pp.682–687. New York: IEEE.
19.
HungLCLinHPChungHY. Design of self-tuning fuzzy sliding mode control for TORA system. Expert Syst Appl2007; 32(1): 201–212.
20.
LeeC-HChangS-K. Experimental implementation of nonlinear TORA system and adaptive backstepping controller design. Neural Comput Appl2012; 21(4): 785–800.
21.
WuTGuiWHuD, et al. Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode control for translational oscillator with rotating actuator: a fuzzy model. IEEE Access2018; 6: 55861–55869.
22.
TavakoliMTaghiradHDAbrishamchianM. Identification and robust control of the rotational/translational actuator system. Int J Control Automat Syst2005; 3(3): 387–396.
23.
AvisJMNersesovSGNathanR, et al. A comparison study of nonlinear control techniques for the RTAC system. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl2010; 11(4): 2647–2658.
24.
LiuCGaoBZhaoJ, et al. Orbitally stabilizing control for the underactuated translational oscillator with rotational actuator system: design and experimentation. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2019; 233(5): 491–500.
25.
QuanQCaiK-Y. Additive-state-decomposition-based tracking control for TORA benchmark. J Sound Vib2013; 332(20): 4829–4841.
26.
MehtaU. Stabilizing relay experiment for modeling of unstable processes with large time delay. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2014; 228(6): 359–368.
27.
MehtaUAnanthanarayananR. Optimal autotuning of nonminimum phase processes under relay control. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2015; 229(5): 455–468.
28.
FangSHuCHuX, et al. Switched sliding mode approach for motion control systems with friction. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2017; 231(7): 513–526.
29.
ZhuPChenYLiM. Terminal sliding mode control of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on the reaching law. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2020; 234(7): 849–859.
30.
BackJShimH. Adding robustness to nominal output-feedback controllers for uncertain nonlinear systems: a nonlinear version of disturbance observer. Automatica2008; 44(10): 2528–2537.
31.
LiSSunHYangJ, et al. Continuous finite-time output regulation for disturbed systems under mismatching condition. IEEE Trans Automat Control2015; 60(1): 277–282.
32.
WuXXuKLeiM, et al. Disturbance-compensation-based continuous sliding mode control for overhead cranes with disturbances. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng2020; 17(4): 2182–2189.
33.
WuXXuKHeX. Disturbance-observer-based nonlinear control for overhead cranes subject to uncertain disturbances. Mech Syst Signal Process2020; 139: 106631.
34.
WuXZhaoYXuK. Nonlinear disturbance observer based sliding mode control for a benchmark system with uncertain disturbances. ISA Trans2021; 110: 63–70.
35.
YangJLiSYuX. Sliding-mode control for systems with mismatched uncertainties via a disturbance observer. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2013; 60(1): 160–169.
36.
YangLYangJ. Nonsingular fast terminal sliding-mode control for nonlinear dynamical systems. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2011; 21(16): 1865–1879.
37.
ZuoZTieL. Distributed robust finite-time nonlinear consensus protocols for multi-agent systems. Int J Syst Sci2016; 47(6): 1366–1375.
38.
BhatSPBernsteinDS. Geometric homogeneity with applications to finite-time stability. Math Control Signal Syst2005; 17(2): 101–127.
