In this work, a simplified model of the compressor variable stator vane fueldraulic actuation system of a jet engine is presented. The actuation system is a sub-assembly of the engine’s hydro-mechanical unit. A unique characteristic of the actuator is an internal cooling flow which prevents the overheating of fuel. It is shown that the effect of the cooling flow is well represented by a static input nonlinearity. The resulting model is of the Hammerstein structure. It is then shown that the model can be used for the estimation of the actuator’s external load. The results are validated using an accurate real system simulator.
MerrittHE.Hydraulic control systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1967.
2.
JalaliMKrollA.Hydraulic servo-systems: modeling, identification and control. London: Springer, 2004.
3.
EryilmazBWilsonBH.Unified modeling and analysis of a proportional valve. J Franklin I2006: 343(1): 48–68.
4.
FalesRC.Stability and performance analysis of a metering poppet valve. Int J Fluid Power2006: 7(2): 11–17.
5.
CristoforiDVaccaA.Modeling hydraulic actuator mechanical dynamics from pressure measured at control valve ports. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2015: 229(6): 541–558.
6.
MagharehASilvaCEDykeSJ.Parametric model of servo-hydraulic actuator coupled with a nonlinear system: experimental validation. Mech Syst Signal Pr2018: 104: 663–672.
7.
LiuGPDaleyS.Optimal-tuning nonlinear PID control of hydraulic systems. Control Eng Pract2000; 8(9): 1045–1053.
8.
LeeI-YOhD-HJiS-Wet al. Control of an overlap-type proportional directional control valve using input shaping filter. Mechatronics2015: 29: 87–95.
9.
YeYYinC-BGongYet al. Position control of nonlinear hydraulic system using an improved PSO based PID controller. Mech Syst Signal Pr2017: 83: 241–259.
10.
WijnheijmerFNausGPostWet al. Modelling and LPV control of an electro-hydraulic servo system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on control applications, Munich, 4–6 October 2006. New York: IEEE.
11.
ThompsonDFPruynJSShuklaA.Feedback design for robust tracking and robust stiffness in flight control actuators using a modified QFT technique. Int J Contr1999: 72(16): 1480–1497.
12.
KarpenkoMSepehriN.Robust position control of an electrohydraulic actuator with a faulty actuator piston seal. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Contr2003: 125(3): 413–423.
13.
KarpenkoMSepehriN.Fault-tolerant control of a servohydraulic positioning system with crossport leakage. IEEE T Contr Syst Technol2005: 13(1): 155–161.
14.
KarpenkoMSepehriN.On quantitative feedback design for robust position control of hydraulic actuators. Control Eng Pract2010; 18(3): 289–299.
15.
MilićVŠitumŽEssertM.Robust H∞ position control synthesis of an electro-hydraulic servo system. ISA T2010: 49(4): 535–542.
16.
PuglisiLJSaltarenRJGarciaCet al. Robustness analysis of a pi controller for a hydraulic actuator. Control Eng Pract2015: 43: 94–108.
17.
RenGEsfandiariMSongJet al. Position control of an electrohydrostatic actuator with tolerance to internal leakage. IEEE T Contr Syst Technol2016: 24(6): 2224–2232.
18.
BobrowJELumK.Adaptive, high bandwidth control of a hydraulic actuator. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control1996: 118(4): 71–75.
19.
KalyoncuMHaydimM.Mathematical modelling and fuzzy logic based position control of an electrohydraulic servosystem with internal leakage. Mechatronics2009: 19(6): 847–858.
20.
MohantyAYaoB.Integrated direct/indirect adaptive robust control of hydraulic manipulators with valve deadband. IEEE-ASME T Mech2011: 16(4): 707–715.
21.
RubagottiMCarminatiMClementeGet al. Modeling and control of an airbrake electro-hydraulic smart actuator. Asian J Control2012: 14(5): 1159–1170.
22.
GuoKWeiJFangJet al. Position tracking control of electro-hydraulic single-rod actuator based on an extended disturbance observer. Mechatronics2015: 27: 47–56.
23.
RenH-PGongP-F.Adaptive control of hydraulic position servo system using output feedback. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2017; 231(7): 527–540.
24.
ManringNDMuhiLFalesRCet al. Using feedback linearization to improve the tracking performance of a linear hydraulic-actuator. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2018; 140(1): 011009.
25.
LiYWangQ.Adaptive neural finite-time trajectory tracking control of hydraulic excavators. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2018; 232: 909–925.
26.
YaoZYuYYaoJ.Artificial neural network–based internal leakage fault detection for hydraulic actuators: an experimental investigation. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2018; 232(4): 369–382.
27.
GiriFBaiE-W (eds). Block-oriented nonlinear system identification. London: Springer, 2010.
28.
BaiE-W.Identification of linear systems with hard input nonlinearities of known structure. Automatica2002; 38(5): 853–860.
29.
PullerTLecchini-VisintiniA. Modelling for control of a jet engine compressor variable stator vanes hydraulic actuator. In: Proceedings of the European control conference (ECC), Aalborg, 29 June–1 July 2016. New York: IEEE.
ArcakMKokotovićP.Nonlinear observers: a circle criterion design and robustness analysis. Automatica2001; 37(12): 1923–1930.
32.
VorosJ.Recursive identification of Hammerstein systems with discontinuous nonlinearities containing dead-zones. IEEE T Automat Contr2003; 48(12): 2203–2206.
33.
ChenW-H.Disturbance observer based control for nonlinear systems. IEEE-ASME T Mech2004; 9(4): 706–710.
34.
RelanRSchoukensJ.Recursive discrete-time models for continuous-time systems under band-limited assumptions. IEEE T Instrum Meas2016; 65(3): 713–723.
