A new type of bond designed as an adapted bond is proposed. This bond can be considered in the transition from an active bond to a bond. This approach makes it possible to know the loading effect of the controller–plant and the feedback connections. In order to determine the loading effect of the closed-loop system, the transfer function using causal paths and causal loops of the system in the physical domain is presented. However, this proposed adapted bond should be used in fault cases. Finally, some examples of bond graph models in open- and closed-loop systems are given.
KarnoppD. C.MargolisD.RosenbergR.System dynamics: modelling and simulation of mechatronic systems, 3rd edition, 2000 (Wiley, New York).
2.
BrownF. T.Engineering system dynamics, 1989 (Dekker, New York).
3.
LiP. Y.NgwompoR. F.Power scaling bond graph approach to the passification of mechatronics systems – with application to electrohydraulic valves. J. Dynam. Syst. Meas. Contr., 2005, 127, 633–641.
4.
KarnoppD.Bond graphs in control: Physical state variables and observers. J. Franklin Inst., 1979, 308(3), 219–234.
5.
GawthropP.Physical model-based control: A bond graph approach. J. Franklin Inst., 1995, 332B(3), 285–305.
6.
GonzalezG.Dauphin-TanguyG.GalindoR.De LeonJ.Steady state error for a closed loop physical system with a bond graph approach. In Proceedings of ICBGM’05, 2005, pp. 107–112.
7.
ZhengK.ShenT.YaoY.KakoJ.YosidaS.Load torque analysis based on the integrated model of HPAS systems. In Proceedings of IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Harbin, China, 2008, pp. 1–6.
8.
NayafabadH. H.RezaeiS. M.GhidaryS. S.Hysteresis compensation of piezoelectric actuators under dynamic load condition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robots and systems, San Diego, California, 2007, pp. 1166–1171.
9.
WangL.WangY. S.Dynamic performance and minimum loading effects of an isolated self-excited reluctance generator. In Power engineering society 1999 winter meeting, IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 13–18.
10.
SchoenR. R.HabetlerT. G.Evaluation and implementation of a system to eliminate arbitrary load effects in current-based monitoring of induction machines. IEEE Trans. Industr. Applic., 1997, 33(6), 1571–1577.
11.
AreeP.Investigation of local load effect on damping characteristics of synchronous generator using transfer-function block-diagram model. Sonklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 2005, 27(4), 828–838.
12.
SueurC.Dauphin-TanguyG.Bond graph approach for structural analysis of MIMO linear systems. J. Franklin Inst., 1991, 328(1), 55–70.
Ould BoumamaB.MedjaherK.SamantarayA. K.StaroswieckiM.Supervision of an industrial steam generator. Part I: Bond graph modelling. Contr. Engng Pract., 2006, 14(1), 71–83.
15.
GawthropP.SmithL.Metamodelling, 1996 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
16.
KarnoppD.Power-conserving transformations: Physical interpretations and applications using bond graphs. J. Franklin Inst., 1969, 288(3), 175–201.
17.
JuncoS.DiéguezG.RamírezF.On comutation modeling in bond graphs. In Proceedings of ICBGM2007, San Diego, California, pp. 115–119.
18.
MostermanP. J.BiswasG.Modeling discontinuities behavior with hybrid bond graphs. In Proceedings of ICBGM1995, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 177–182.
19.
GawthropP. J.Hybrid bond graphs using switched I and C components, CSC Report 97005, University of Glasgow, 1997.
20.
NugrohoT.QinS. J.Sensor validation and process fault diagnosis for FCC units under MPC feedback. Contr. Engng Pract., 2001, 9, 877–888.
21.
WellsteadP. E.Physical system modelling, 1979 (Academic, London).
22.
Dauphin-TanguyG.Les bond graphs, 2000 (Hermes, Paris).
23.
KundurJ. R.Power system stability and control, 1994 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
24.
AndersonP. M.Power system control and stability, 1977 (The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa).
25.
SahmD.A two-axis, bond graph model of the dynamics of synchronous electrical machine. J. Franklin Inst., 1979, 308(3), 205–218.
26.
KrauseP. C.WasynczukO.SudhoffS. D.Analysis of electric machinery, 1995 (IEEE Press, Piscataway, New Jersey).
27.
AguilarD.VazquezG.RolanA.Simulation of wound rotor synchronous machine under voltage sags. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial electronics, ISIE, July, pp. 2626–2631.
28.
De Leon-MoralesJ.BusawonK.Acha-DazaS.A robust observer-based controller for synchronous generators. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., 2001, 23, 195–211.
29.
SedaghatiA.A PI controller based on gain-scheduling for synchronous generator. Turk. J. Elect. Engng Comput. Sci., 2006, 14(2), 241–251.
30.
PekarekSteven D.LemanskiM. T.WaltersE. A.On the use of singular perturbations to neglect the dynamic saliency of synchronous machines. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2002, 17(3), 385–391.
31.
NiseN. S.Control systems engineering, 2000 (Wiley, New York).
