This paper examines the interface between semiotics and psychology, first from the historical point of view of their parallel developments originating in late 18th-century philosophy, then from the theoretical perspective of contemporary evolutionary thinking. Undifferentiated within the speculations of the French `Idéologues', such as Destutt de Tracy (1754-1836), semiotics and psychology progressively acquired distinct epistemological and institutional status with minimal mutual interactions. However, the emergence of cognitive psychology during the second half of the 20th century provided new theoretical grounds for a potential dialogue. As the Darwinian revolution eventually recast many problems common to both semiotics and psychology in evolutionary terms, it is argued that these two parallel approaches to the study of mind, symbolic behaviour and meaning are bound to merge in the foreseeable future. The example of a recent work by Terrence Deacon (1997) is cited in the conclusion of the paper as a symptom of this epistemological restructuration that is currently taking shape.
Aarsleff, H. (1978). Taine and Saussure. The Yale Review, 68, 71-81.
2.
Aarsleff H. (1982). From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the study of language and intellectual history. Minneapolis: University of Minesota Press.
3.
Andresen, J.T. (1983). Signs and systems in Condillac and Saussure. Semiotica, 44(3/4), 259-281.
4.
Andresen, J.T. (1988). The Ideologues, Condillac, and the politics of sign theory. Semiotica, 72(3/4), 271-290.
5.
Andresen, J.T. (1990). Linguistics in America 1769-1924: A critical history. London/New York: Routledge.
6.
Auroux, S. (1979). La sémiotique des Encyclopédistes: Essai d' épistémologie historique des sciences du langage. Paris: Payot.
7.
Bechtel, W. , & Abrahamsen, A.A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
Bouissac, P. (1986). Tradition, speculation and cognition: A prospective investigation of semiotic terminology. In J. Evans (Ed.), Semiotics and international scholarship: Toward an international language of theory, NATO ASI Series (pp. 1-24). The Hague: Nijhoff.
9.
Bouissac, P. (1992). The construction of ignorance and the evolution of knowledge. University of Toronto Quarterly, 61(4), 460-472.
10.
Bouissac, P. (1993). Why do memes die? In J. Deely (Ed.), Semiotics 92. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Semiotic Society of America (pp. 183-192). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
11.
Bouissac, P. (1994). Information vs. meaning: From ecology as semiotic utopia to evolution as entropy. In C. Dreyer, H. Espe, H. Kalkofen, I. Lempp, P. Pellegrino, & R. Posner (Eds.), Zeichen im Leben der Menschen/Signs within Human Life (pp. 177-198). Hildesheim: Olms.
12.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
13.
Busse, W. , & Trabant, J. (Eds.). (1986). Les Ideologues: Sémiotique, théories et politiques linguistiques pendant la Révolution française. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
14.
Camhi, J.M. (1984). Neuroethology: Nerve cells and the natural behavior of animals. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
15.
Carnap, R. (1938). Logical foundations of the unity of science. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap, & C. Morris (Eds.), International encyclopedia of unified science (Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 42-62). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Catania, A.C. (1978). The psychology of learning: Some lessons from the Darwinian revolution. In K. Salzinger & F. L. Denmark (Eds.), Psychology: The state of the art (Vol. 309, pp. 18-28). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
17.
Choul, J.-C. (1982). Michel Bréal sémioticien: La disproportion du signe. Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry, 2(4), 360-398.
18.
Cosmides, L. , & Tooby, J. (1995). From function to structure: The role of evolutionary biology and computational theories in cognitive neurosciences. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1199-1210). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Dascal, M. (1983). Signs and cognitive processes: Notes for a chapter in the history of semiotics. In A. Eschbach & J. Trabant (Eds.), History of semiotics (pp. 169-190). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
20.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Dawkins, R. (1989). The evolution of evolvability. In C. G. Langton (Ed.), Artificial life (pp. 201-220). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
22.
Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: Norton.
23.
Deely, J. (1990). Basics of semiotics. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
24.
De Mey, M. (1982). The cognitive paradigm. DordrechtlBoston: Reidel.
25.
Dennett, D. (1990). Memes and the exploitation of imagination. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 48(2), 125-135.
26.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967.)
27.
Destutt de Tracy, A. (1825). Éléments d'idéologie. Paris: Lévi. (Original work published 1801.)
28.
Devlin, K. (1991). Logic and information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
30.
Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
31.
Eschbach, A. (1986). Note sur la `Note sur l'influence des signes' de Maine de Biran. In W. Busse & J. Trabant (Eds.), Les Idéologues: Sémiotique, théories et politiques linguistiques pendant la Re'volution franCaise (pp. 59-72). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
32.
Gabora, L. (1997). The origin and evolution of culture and creativity. Journal of Memetics-Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 1 (http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/voll/gabora_l.html).
33.
Gardner, H. (1987). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
34.
Gazzaniga, M. (1992). Nature's mind: The impact of Darwinian selection on thinking, emotions, sexuality, language and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
35.
Gazzaniga, M. (Ed.). (1995). The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
Godfray, H. C. J. (1994). Parasitoids: Behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Prince-ton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Greimas, A.J. (1970). Du sens. Paris: Seuil.
38.
Greimas, A.J. , & Courtes, J. (1982). Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary (L. Crist, D. Patte, J. Lee, E. McMahon II, G. Phillips, & M. Rengstorf Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1979.)
39.
Hahlweg, K. , & Hooker, C. A. (Eds.). (1989). Issues in evolutionary epistemology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
40.
Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
41.
Hull, D.L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Johnson, D. M. , & Erneling, C. E. (Eds.). (1997). The future of the cognitive revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
Klahr, D. (1992). Information-processing approaches to cognitive development. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (pp. 273-335). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44.
Klahr, D. (1995). Computational models of cognitive change: The state of the art. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 355-375). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
Koch, W.A. (1986). Genes vs. memes: Modes of integration for natural and cultural evolution in a holistic model. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
46.
Koerner, E. F. K. (1973). Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and development of his linguistic thought in western studies of language. Brunswick: Vieweg.
47.
Koerner, E. F. K. (Ed.). (1983). Linguistics and evolutionary theory: Three essays by August Schleicher Ernst Haeckel and Wilhelm Bleek. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Original work published 1869.)
48.
Morris, C. (1971). Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague: Mouton. (Original work published 1946.)
49.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionay approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
50.
Rescher, N. (1977). Methodological pragmatism. Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
Rossi-Landi, F. (1983). Language as work and trade: A semiotic homology for linguistics and economics (M. Adams et al., Trans.). South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
52.
Searle, J.R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53.
Sebeok, T.A. (1976). Contributions to the doctrine of signs. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
54.
Sebeok, T.A. (1979). The sign and its masters. Austin/London: University of Texas Press.
55.
Sebeok, T. A. (Ed.). (1986). Encyclopedic dictionary of semiotics (3 vols.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
56.
Sergent, J. (Ed.). (1985). Special Issue on Neurosemiotics. Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry, 5(3), 223-322.
57.
Simon, T. J. , & Halford, G. S. (Eds.). (1995). Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58.
Thom, R. (1983). Mathematical models of morphogenesis (W. M. Brooks & D. Rand, Trans.). New York: Wiley.
59.
Todorov, T. (1978). The birth of occidental semiotics. In R. W. Bailey, L. Matejka, & P. Steiner (Eds.), The sign: Semiotics around the world (pp. 1-42). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
60.
Tooby, J. , & Cosmides, L. (1995). Mapping the evolved functional organization of mind and brain. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1185-1197). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal: Evolutionary psychology and everyday life. New York: Pantheon.
62.
Wuketis, F.M. (1991). Evolution and cognition: Paradigms, perspectives, problems. Evolution and Cognition, 1(1), 1-29.
