In her comment, Dehue (1990) advocates and practices the occasional, rather than the principled, use of contextualism in historical studies. However, I regard contextualism as a regulative principle of such studies which applies to the historian as well as to the subject matter. Because historical studies are themselves historically situated, Dehue's `symmetrical contextualism' must remain an illusion.
Bagioli, M. (1996). From relativism to contingentism. In P. Galison & D. J. Stump (Eds.), The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power (pp. 189-206). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
Danziger, K. (1994). Does the history of psychology have a future?Theory & Psychology, 4, 467-484.
3.
Dehue, T. (1998). Community historians and the dilemma of rigor vs relevance: A comment on Danziger and Van Rappard. Theory & Psychology, 8, 653-661.
4.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
