Over the past decades, some historians have proposed that a “new history of psychology” emerged in symmetrical opposition to the “old.” This article presents a critique of this rhetoric. To this purpose, it first evaluates how proponents of the “new history” have misused dichotomies in light of criticisms raised against them. An analysis then follows of the implications thereof for the actual critical historiography and for the history of psychology as a whole. It is argued that this dichotomization presents inconsistencies and produces undesirable implications for both fields. It is also suggested that this rhetoric should be replaced by a more balanced view of dichotomies and an emphasis on critical reflection rather than on simple prescriptions and prohibitions.
AraujoS. F. (2017). Toward a philosophical history of psychology: An alternative path for the future. Theory & Psychology, 27, 87–107. doi:10.1177/0959354316656062
2.
AshM. G. (1983). The self-presentation of a discipline: History of psychology in the United States between pedagogy and scholarship. In GrahamL.LepeniesW.WeingartP. (Eds.), Functions and uses of disciplinary histories (pp. 143–189). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
3.
BaldwinJ. M. (1913). History of psychology: A sketch and an interpretation (Vols. 1–2). London, UK: Watts & Co.
4.
BallL. C. (2012). Genius without the “great man”: New possibilities for the historian of psychology. History of Psychology, 15, 72–83. doi: 10.1037/a0023247
5.
BernsteinM. D.RussoN. F. (1974). The history of psychology revisited or, up with our foremothers. American Psychologist, 29, 130–134.
6.
BlumenthalA. L. (1979). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist, 30, 1081–1088.
7.
BoringE. G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York, NY: Century.
8.
BoringE. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9.
BrockA. C. (2006). Rediscovering the history of psychology: Interview with Kurt Danziger. History of Psychology, 9, 1–16. doi: 10.1037/1093–4510.9.1.1
10.
BrockA. C. (2016). The new history of psychology: Some (different) answers to Lovett’s five questions. History of Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/hop0000036
11.
BrushS. G. (1974). Should the history of science be rated X?Science, 183, 1164–1172.
12.
BrushS. G. (1995). Scientists as historians. Osiris, 10, 215–231.
13.
ButterfieldH. (1951). The Whig interpretation of history. New York, NY: Scribner. (Original work published 1931)
14.
CarrE. H. (1987). What is history? (2nd ed.). London, UK: Penguin Books.
15.
DanzigerK. (1979). The positivist repudiation of Wundt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 205–230.
16.
DanzigerK. (1985). The origins of the psychological experiment as a social institution. American Psychologist, 40, 133–140.
17.
DanzigerK. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
DanzigerK. (1994). Does the history of psychology have a future?Theory & Psychology, 4, 467–484. doi: 10.1177/0959354394044001
19.
DeCarvalhoR. J. (1990). A history of the “third force” in psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 30, 22–44.
20.
DewsburyD. A. (1990). Whither the introductory course in the history of psychology?Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 26, 371–377.
21.
FinisonL. J. (1976). Unemployment, politics, and the history of organized psychology. American Psychologist, 31, 747–755.
22.
FinisonL. J. (1978). Unemployment, politics, and the history of organized psychology, II: The Psychologists League, the WPA, and the National Health Program. American Psychologist, 33, 747–755.
23.
FurumotoL. (1979). Mary Whiton Calkins (1863–1930): Fourteenth president of the American Psychological Association. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 346–356. doi: 10.1002/1520–6696(197910)15:4<346::AID-JHBS2300150408>3.0.CO;2-Z
24.
FurumotoL. (1989). The new history of psychology. In CohenI. S. (Ed.), The G. Stanley Hall lecture series (Vol. 9, pp. 9–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
FurumotoL. (2003). Beyond great men and great ideas: History of psychology in sociocultural context. In BronsteinP.QuinaK. (Eds.), Teaching gender and multicultural awareness: Resources for the psychology classroom (pp. 113–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
GardnerH. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York, NY: Basic Books.
27.
GoodwinC. J. (2002). Teaching the history of psychology. In DavisS. F.BuskistW. (Eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 349–360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
GuthrieR. V. (1976). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
29.
HarrisB. (1979). Whatever happened to Little Albert?American Psychologist, 34, 151–160.
30.
HarrisB. (1980). Ceremonial versus critical history of psychology. American Psychologist, 35, 218–219.
31.
HarrisB. (1997). Repoliticizing the history of psychology. In FoxD.PrilleltenskyI. (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 21–33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
HarrisB. (2009). What critical psychologists should know about the history of psychology. In FoxD.PrilleltenskyI. (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 20–35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
HarrisonE. (September, 1987). Whigs, prigs and historians of science. Nature, 329, 213–214. doi: 10.1038/329213a0
34.
HilgardE. R.LearyD. E.McGuireG. R. (1991). The history of psychology: A survey and critical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 79–107.
35.
HoganJ. D.GoshtasbpourE.LauferM. R.HaswellE. (1998). Teaching the history of psychology: What’s hot and what’s not. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 206–208.
36.
HullD. L. (1979). In defense of presentism. History and Theory, 18, 1–15.
37.
HullD. L. (1990). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
JonesD.ElcockJ. (2001). History and theories of psychology: A critical perspective. London, UK: Arnold.
39.
KimbleG. A.SchlesingerK. (Eds.). (1985). Topics in the history of psychology (Vols. 1–2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40.
KraghH. (1987). An introduction to the historiography of science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KuhnT. S. (1968). Science: I. The history of science. In SillsD. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 14, pp. 74–83). New York, NY: Macmillan.
42.
LakatosI. (1970). History of science and its rational reconstructions. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, VIII, 91–136.
43.
LaudanR. (1992). The “new” history of science: Implications for philosophy of science. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 476–481.
44.
LawsonR. B.GrahamJ. E.BakerK. M. (2016). A history of psychology: Globalization, ideas, and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
LeaheyT. H. (1986). History without the past [Review of the book Topics in the history of psychology, by G. A. Kimble & K. Schlesinger]. Contemporary Psychology, 31, 648–650.
46.
LeaheyT. H. (2000). A history of psychology: Main currents in psychological thought (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47.
LeaheyT. H. (2009, September23). History without the past II: Wandering amidst the shards of the past [Review of the book Psychology: Pythagoras to present, by J. C. Malone]. PsycCRITIQUES, 54(38). doi: 10.1037/a0017429
48.
LernerG. (2005). The majority finds its past: Placing women in history. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
49.
LovettB. J. (2006). The new history of psychology: A review and critique. History of Psychology, 9, 17–37. doi: 10.1037/1093–4510.9.1.17
50.
MorisonS. E. (1951). Faith of a historian. The American Historical Review, 56, 261–275.
51.
O’DonnellJ. M. (1979). The crisis of experimentalism in the 1920s: E. G. Boring and his uses of history. American Psychologist, 34, 289–295.
52.
O’DonnellJ. M. (1985). The origins of behaviorism: American psychology, 1870–1920. New York, NY: New York University Press.
53.
PettitM.DavidsonI. (2014). Can the history of psychology have an impact?Theory & Psychology, 24, 709–716. doi: 10.1177/0959354314534005
54.
PickrenW. E.RutherfordA. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
55.
RichardsG. (1987). Of what is history of psychology a history?British Journal for the History of Science, 20, 201–211. doi: 10.1017/S0007087400023748
SamelsonF. (1980a). E. G. Boring and hisHistory of Experimental Psychology. American Psychologist, 35, 289–295.
58.
SamelsonF. (1980b). J. B. Watson’s little Albert, Cyril Burt’s twins, and the need for a critical science. American Psychologist, 35, 619–625.
59.
SamelsonF. (1999). Assessing research in the history of psychology: Past, present, and future. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 35, 247–255. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199922)35:3<247::AID-JHBS4>3.0.CO;2-G
60.
SewellW. H. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61.
SmithR. (1988). Does the history of psychology have a subject?History of the Human Sciences, 1, 147–177. doi: 10.1177/095269518800100201
62.
SmithR. (1998). The big picture: Writing psychology into the history of the human sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 34, 1–13.
63.
StockingG. W.Jr. (1965). On the limits of “presentism” and “historicism” in the historiography of the behavioral sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1, 211–218.
64.
TeoT. (2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. New York, NY: Springer.
65.
TeoT. (2013). Agnotology in the dialectics of the history and philosophy of psychology. Theory & Psychology, 23, 840–851. doi: 10.1177/0959354313504838
66.
TeoT.GoertzenJ. (2004). [Review of the book Ape to Apollo: Aesthetics and the idea of race in the 18th century, by D. Bindman]. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 40, 339–341.
67.
Vaughn-BlountK.RutherfordA.BakerD.JohnsonD. (2009). History’s mysteries demystified: Becoming a psychologist–historian. American Journal of Psychology, 122, 117–129.
68.
WalshR. T. G.TeoT.BaydalaA. (2014). A critical history and philosophy of psychology: Diversity of context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
WatsonR. I. (1960). The history of psychology: A neglected area. American Psychologist, 15, 251–255.
70.
WatsonR. I. (1967). Psychology: A prescriptive science. American Psychologist, 22, 435–443.
71.
WatsonR. I. (1975). The history of psychology as a specialty: A personal view of its first 15 years. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 11, 5–14. doi: 10.1002/1520–6696(197501)11:1<5::AID-JHBS2300110104>3.0.CO;2–0
72.
WoodwardW. R. (1980). Toward a critical historiography of psychology. In BrožekJ.PongratzL. J. (Eds.), Historiography of modern psychology: Aims, resources, approaches (pp. 29–67). Toronto, Canada: C. J. Hogrefe.
73.
YancharS. C.SlifeB. D.WarneR. (2008). Critical thinking as disciplinary practice. Review of General Psychology, 12, 265–281. doi: 10.1037/1089–2680.12.3.265
74.
YoungR. M. (1966). Scholarship and the history of the behavioural sciences. History of Science, 2, 1–51.
