Two Incompatible Positions in the Challenge Against the `Individual Subject of Modernity'

Abstract

This paper discusses the theoretical status of human beings in the therapeutic sciences of modern societies. The concept of the `individual' was shaped, and achieved an unsurpassable status in scientific discourse, during the 17th and 18th centuries. Likewise specialized disciplines have appeared to codify its `normal' and `deviant' conducts. Since the 1960s, there have arisen certain critical accounts challenging the existence of such an individual in social theory. I examine two perspectives questioning the status of the `individual' in administrative practices at institutions of confinement: the anti-psychiatry movement and the post-structuralist critique of `reason'. This paper contrasts these positions through the work of two exemplary thinkers (Goffman and Foucault), and reveals the impossibility of reconciliation, owing in the main to the very definition of the individual subject in theoretical discourse.

Keywords

anti-psychiatry Foucault Goffman individuality institutionalization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Castel, R. (1988). The regulation of madness: The origins of incarceration in France. Cambridge: Polity.

Castel, R. (1992). The two readings of Historie de la folie in France. In A. Still & I. Velody (Eds.), Rewriting the history of madness (pp. 65-69). London: Routledge.

Cooper, B. (1981). Michel Foucault: An introduction to the study of his thought. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.

Clegg, S.R. (1989). Framework of power. London: Sage.

Donzelot, J. (1980). The policing offamilies. London: Hutchinson.

Domer, K. (1981). Madmen and the bourgeoisie: A social history of insanity and psychiatry. London: Blackwell.

Foucault, M. (1961). Folie et deraison: Historie de la folie a l'age classique. Paris: Plon.

Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the Age of Reason. London: Tavistock.

Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic. London: Tavistock.

10.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.

11.

Foucault, M. (1978). About the concept of the `dangerous individual' in 19th-century legal psychiatry. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1, 1-18.

12.

Foucault, M. (1979). On governmentality. Ideology & Consciousness, 6(Autumn), 5-21.

13.

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1987. New York: Pantheon.

14.

Foucault, M. (1988). Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977-1984. London: Routledge.

15.

Freeman, H. (1967). Anti-psychiatry through history. New Society, 19(240), 665-666.

16.

Giddens, A. (1986). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.

17.

Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. New York: Anchor.

18.

Gordon, C. (1992). Historie de la folie: An unknown book by Michel Foucault. In A. Still & I. Velody (Eds.), Rewriting the history of madness (pp. 19-45). London: Routledge.

19.

Laing, R.D. (1967). The invention of madness. New Statesman, 71(1892), 843.

20.

Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.

21.

Miller, P. (1986). Critiques of psychiatry and critical sociologies of madness. In P. Miller & N. Rose (Eds.), Power of psychiatry (pp. 12-43). Cambridge: Polity.

22.

Parry-Jones, W.L. (1969). Review of Madness and civilization by Foucault. The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8(2), 191.

23.

Porter, R. (1987). A social history of madness: Stories of the insane. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

24.

Porter, R. (1990). Foucault's great confinement. History of the Human Sciences, 3(1), 41-46.

25.

Rose, N. (1986). Psychiatry: The discipline of mental health. In P. Miller & N. Rose (Eds.), Power of psychiatry (pp. 43-85). Cambridge: Polity.

26.

Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.

27.

Sedgwick, P. (1982). Psychopolitics. London: Pluto.