We argue that a feminist history of psychology is not merely a corrective add-on to existing narratives but a methodology for transforming the discipline’s concepts, practices, and forms of authority. Drawing on sociohistorical and genealogical approaches, we examine how psychological knowledge has been produced through specific dispositifs (laboratories, tests, diagnostic manuals, professional roles) and how these have encoded gendered, racialized, and classed hierarchies. Rather than treating “theory” and “practice” as separate domains, we show how psychological theories are inseparable from the experimental, diagnostic, and institutional practices that enact them, and how these practices shape subjectivities and social order. The paper develops three intersecting genealogies of modern psychology: (1) the construction of sexual difference as a foundational axis of psychological theory and measurement; (2) the experimental production of authority in the laboratory, and the feminist reworking of reflexivity and positionality; and (3) the culture of diagnosis, from hysteria to contemporary happiness and resilience discourses, as technologies of regulation and self-surveillance. Across these domains, we mobilize feminist epistemologies of situated knowledge, ignorance, and critique to denaturalize core psychological categories and to foreground their political effects. We conclude by outlining principles for rewriting psychology as a feminist practice that links knowledge and care, relocates authority in relational and participatory methodologies, and reorients psychological work from individual adaptation toward structural transformation. In doing so, we propose feminist historiography as a crucial resource for imagining other possible (histories of) psychology.
ArnaudS. (2015). On hysteria: The invention of a medical category between 1670 and 1820. The University of Chicago Press.
4.
BalltondreM.JiménezB. (2023). Una historia crítica de la psicología. Casos de análisis para otra historia de la disciplina [A critical history of psychology: Case studies for an alternative history of the discipline]. Fundació Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
BathiaS.LongA.PickrenW.RutherfordA. (2024). Engaging with decoloniality, decolonization, and histories of psychology otherwise. In Comas-DíazL.AdamesH. Y.Chavez-DueñasN. Y. (Eds.), Decolonial psychology: Toward anticolonial theories, research, training, and practice (pp. 59–83). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000376-004
7.
BharjN.HubbardK. (2023). Power/history/psychology: A feminist excavation. In ZurbriggenE. L.CapdevilaR. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of power, gender, and psychology (pp. 13–26). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41531-9_2
8.
BittelC. (2013). Woman, know thyself: Producing and using phrenological knowledge in 19th-century America. Centaurus, 55(2), 104–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12015
9.
Borch-JacobsenM.ShamdasaniS. (2012). The Freud files: An inquiry into the history of psychoanalysis. Cambridge University Press.
10.
BourkeJ. (1999). Dismembering the male: Men’s bodies, Britain and the great war. Reaktion Books Ltd.
11.
ButlerJ. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
12.
CabanasE.IllouzE. (2019). Manufacturing happy citizens: How the science and industry of happiness control our lives. Paidós.
13.
CapdevilaR.LazardL. (2015). Psychology of women: Questions of politics and practice. In ParkerI. (Ed.), Handbook of Critical Psychology (1st ed., pp. 191–199). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726526-24
14.
CapdevilaR.ZurbriggenE. L. (2023). Introduction: Feminist theorizing on power, gender, and psychology. In ZurbriggenE.CapdevilaR. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of power, gender, and psychology (pp. 1–9). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41531-9_1
15.
CicciaL. (2022). Sucesos comportamentales: estados mentales, cuerpo y género [Behavioral events: Mental states, body, and gender]. Debate feminista, 63, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2022.63.2311
16.
CornelT. (2014). Matters of sex and gender in F. J. Gall’s organology: A primary approach. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 23(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2014.885097
17.
DanzigerK. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press.
18.
DanzigerK. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Sage.
19.
DespretV. (2004). Our emotional makeup: Ethnopsychology and selfhood. Other Press.
20.
DixonT. (2003). From passions to emotions: The creation of a secular psychological category. Cambridge University Press.
21.
EhrenreichB.EnglishD. (1978). For her own good: 150 years of the experts’ advice to women. Anchor Books.
22.
FineC. (2010). Delusions of gender. The real science behind sex differences. Icon Books.
23.
FineM. (1985). Reflections on a feminist psychology of women: Paradoxes and prospects. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(2), 167–183.
24.
FineM.GordonR. (1989). Feminist transformations of/despite psychology. In CrawfordM.GentryM. (Eds.), Gender and thought (pp. 146–174). Springer.
25.
FineM.TorreM. E. (2019). Critical participatory action research: A feminist project for validity and solidarity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(4), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319865255
26.
FinkenbuschP. (2022). Resilience as the policing of critique: A pragmatist way forward. Review of International Studies, 49(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000213
27.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.
28.
GarcíaD. (2003). Fertilizaciones cruzadas entre la psicología social de la ciencia y los estudios feministas de la ciencia [Cross fertilizations between social psychology of science and science feminist’ studies], Athenea Digital, (4), 109–150. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.89
29.
GarcíaD. (2005). Psicología y feminismo: Historia olvidada de mujeres pioneras en psicología [Psychology and feminism: The forgotten history of women pioneers in psychology]. Narcea.
30.
GilmanS. L. (1993). The image of the hysteric. In GilmanS. L.KingH.PorterR.RousseauG. S.ShowalterE. (Eds.), Hysteria beyond Freud (pp. 345–436). University of California Press.
31.
GoldsteinJ. E. (2001). Console and classify: The French psychiatric profession in the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press.
32.
GouldS. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man. Norton.
33.
HackingI. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton University Press.
34.
HackingI. (1996). The looping effects of human kinds. In SperberD.PremackD.James PremackA. (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate. Symposia of the Fyssen Foundation (pp. 351–383). Oxford.
HarawayD. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
37.
HarawayD. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. Routledge.
38.
HardingS. (1986). The science question in feminism. Cornell University Press.
39.
HardingS. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
40.
IllouzE. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Polity Press.
Jiménez-AlonsoB.BalltondreM. (2023). Una (otra) historia de la psicología: Perspectivas críticas y conceptos de análisis [Another history of psychology: Critical perspectives and analytical concepts]. Fundació Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
43.
JoelD.Fausto-SterlingA. (2016). Beyond sex differences: New approaches for thinking about variation in brain structure and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371(1688), 20150451. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0451
44.
KellerE. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. Yale University Press.
45.
KellerE. F. (1995). Gender and science: Origin, history, and politics. Osiris, 10, 26–38.
LaqueurT. (1990). Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Harvard University Press.
49.
LatourB. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes: Essai d’anthropologie symétrique [We have never been modern]. La Découverte.
50.
LazarM. M. (2007). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
51.
LazardL.McAvoyJ. (2017). Doing reflexivity in psychological research: What’s the point? What’s the practice?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1400144
52.
LernerG. (1975). Placing women in history: Definitions and challenges. Feminist Studies, 3(1/2), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/3518951
MorawskiJ. G.SteeleR. S. (1991). The one or the other? Textual analysis of masculine power and feminist empowerment. Theory & Psychology, 1(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354391011007
58.
PickrenW. E.RutherfordA. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. Wiley-Blackwell.
59.
PorterR. (1993). The body and the mind, the doctor and the patient: Negotiating hysteria. In GilmanS. L.KingH.PorterR.RousseauG. S.ShowalterE. (Eds.), Hysteria beyond Freud (pp. 225–286). University of California Press.
60.
PoskettJ. (2019). Materials of the mind: Phrenology, race, and the global history of science, 1815–1920. University of Chicago Press.
61.
RadtkeL. H.StamH. J. (2016). A history of psychology’s complicated relationship to feminism: Theorizing difference. In HroarS.SmithR. (Eds.), Centrality of history for theory construction in psychology (pp. 167–186). Springer.
RichardsG. (2002). Putting psychology in its place: A critical historical overview. Routledge.
66.
RipponG.Jordan-YoungR.KaiserA.FineC. (2014). Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: Key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 650. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00650
67.
RoseN. (1996a). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge University Press.
68.
RoseN. (1996b). Power and subjectivity: Critical history and psychology. In GraumannC.GergenK. (Eds.), Historical dimensions of psychological discourse (pp. 103–124). Cambridge University Press.
69.
Ruiz CuencaV. (2021). Medicine, modernity, and masculinity: A history of neurasthenia in Spain, c. 1890–1920 [Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona].
RutherfordA. (2018). Feminism, psychology, and the gendering of neoliberal subjectivity: From critique to disruption. Theory & Psychology, 28(5) 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_136
72.
RutherfordA. (2020). Doing science, doing gender: Using history in the present. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 40(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000134
73.
RutherfordA. (2021). Psychology at the intersections of gender, feminism, history, and culture. Cambridge University Press.
74.
RutherfordA.PettitM. (2015). Feminism and/in/as psychology: The public sciences of sex and gender. History of Psychology, 18(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039533
75.
RutherfordA.Vaughn-BlountK.BallL. C.(2010). Responsible opposition, disruptive voices: Science, social change, and the history of feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01596.x
76.
ScarboroughE.FurumotoL. (1987). Untold lives: The first generation of American women psychologists. Columbia University Press.
77.
SchiebingerL. (1989). The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science. Harvard University Press.
78.
SchmitzS.HöppnerG. (2014). Neurofeminism and feminist neurosciences: A critical review of contemporary brain research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00546
79.
ScottJ. W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.2307/1864376
80.
ScullA. (2009). Hysteria:The biography. Oxford University Press.
81.
ShieldsS. A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. American Psychologist, 30(7), 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076948
82.
ShieldsS. A. (1984). “To pet, coddle, and ‘do fo’”: Caretaking and the concept of maternal instinct. In LewinM. (Ed.), In the shadow of the past: Psychology examines the sexes (pp. 256–273). Columbia University Press.
83.
ShieldsS. A. (2007). Passionate men, emotional women: Psychology constructs gender difference in the late nineteenth century. History of Psychology, 10(2), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.92
84.
ShieldsS. A. (2013). Gender and emotion: What we think we know, what we need to know, and why it matters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313502312
85.
ShowalterE. (1986). The female malady: Women, madness and English culture, 1830–1980. Virago.
86.
ShowalterE. (1987). Rivers and Sassoon: The inscription of male gender anxieties. In RandolphM. R. J.JensonJ.MichelS.CollinsM. (Eds.), Behind the lines: Gender and the two world wars (pp. 61–170). Yale University Press.
87.
ShowalterE. (1993). Hysteria, feminism, and gender. In GilmanS. L.KingH.PorterR.RousseauG. S.ShowalterE. (Eds.), Hysteria beyond Freud (pp. 286–345). University of California Press.
88.
SmithR. (2005). The history of psychological categories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(1), 55–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.12.006
89.
SmithR. (2007). Being human: Historical knowledge and the creation of human nature. Columbia University Press.
90.
SmithR. (2016). History of psychology: What for? In HroarS.SmithR. (Eds.), Centrality of history for theory construction in psychology (pp. 3–28). Springer.
91.
TakasunaM. (2007). Proliferation of Western methodological thought in psychology in Japan: Ways of objectification. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9006-y
92.
TavrisC. (1992). The mismeasure of woman. Simon and Schuster.
93.
TuanaN. (2006). The speculum of ignorance: The women’s health movement and epistemologies of ignorance. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 21(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01110.x
94.
UngerR. K. (2001). Women as subjects, actors, and agents in the history of psychology. In UngerR. K. (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 3–16). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
95.
UngerR. K. (2007). Afterword: From inside and out: Reflecting on a feminist politics of gender in psychology. Feminism and Psychology, 17(4), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507083099
96.
UngerR. K.DenmarkF. L. (1975). Woman: Dependent or independent variable?Psychological Dimensions.
97.
UngerR. K.DottoloA. L. (2016). Historical significance of Shields’ 1975 essay: A brief commentary on four major contributions. Feminism & Psychology, 26(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353516641141
98.
UssherJ. M. (2010). Are we medicalizing women’s misery? A critical review of women’s higher rates of reported depression. Feminism & Psychology, 20(1), 935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353509350213
99.
UssherJ. M. (2011). The madness of women: Myth and experience. Routledge.
100.
UssherJ. M. (2023). Women’s mental health: A critique of hetero-patriarchal power and pathologization. In ZurbriggenE. L.CapdevilaR. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of power, gender, and psychology (pp. 437–457). Palgrave Macmillan.
VidalF.OrtegaF. (2017). Being brains: Making the cerebral subject. Fordham University Press.
103.
WeissteinN. (1993). Psychology constructs the female; or the fantasy life of the male psychologist (with some attention to the fantasies of his friends, the male biologist and the male anthropologist). Feminism & Psychology, 3(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353593032005 (Original work published 1971)
104.
WiggintonB.LafranceM. N. (2019). Learning critical feminist research: A brief introduction to feminist epistemologies and methodologies. Feminism & Psychology, 29(4), 2–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353519866058
WilkinsonS. (2001). Theoretical perspectives on women and gender. In UngerR. K. (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 3–16). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
107.
WynterS. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom. The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
