Hysteria in empathy: Understanding virtual companionship and emotional connection between humans and Al

Abstract

Increasing numbers of people tend to seek relationships with artificial intelligence (AI) because of its comprehensive mastery of knowledge. This research reveals that ChatGPT has become a temporary refuge for individuals encountering real-life emotional crises. The communicative affordance of human–AI conversation is featured by logos-centrism, pursuing the identity of language and essence between humans and technology. Grounded in Lacanian discourse theory, this research argues that the psychological and discursive dynamics behind human–AI dialogue entail a structure of the hysteric’s discourse, which stems from the questioning users fantasizing and interrogating the GPT as a master of knowledge. Also, capitalist discourse is revealed during the repetitive AI companionship that empowers users with the agency of controlling the dialogue and the user’s primordial lack of desire is transformed into a demand that can be resolved through consumption. GPT may become a consumer product of technological capital, while the emotional needs of individuals are commodified within these discursive structures.

Keywords

AI capitalist discourse ChatGPT hysteric’s discourse virtual companionship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamopoulou

Moussiades

(2020). Chatbots: History, technology, and applications. Machine Learning with Applications, 2, Article 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006

Bertacchini

Demarco

Scuro

Pantano

Bilotta

(2023). A social robot connected with ChatGPT to improve cognitive functioning in ASD subjects. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1232177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232177

Bianchi

(2012). Marx and Lacan. From representation to class struggle. Journal of the Circle for Lacanian Ideology Critique, 5, 114–126. https://www.academia.edu/2944905/Marx_and_Lacan_From_Representation_to_Class_Struggle

Billig

(1999). Freudian repression: Conversation creating the unconscious. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490088

Brandtzaeg

P. B.

Følstad

(2017, November 22–24). Why people use chatbots [Paper presentation]. Internet Science: 4th International Conference, INSCI 2017, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Bryant

L. R.

(2016). Žižek’s new universe of discourse: Politics and the discourse of the capitalist. International Journal of Žižek Studies, 2(4), 1–48. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Žižek’s-New-Universe-of-Discourse%3A-Politics-and-the-Bryant/939b3fd9dc669ac1b4cbfbfe51adaadcd74b3dcf

Castro

J. C. L. D

. (2016). Applications of the Lacanian theory of discourses in the field of communication. Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências Da Comunicação, 39(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-5844201627

Charmaz

Bryant

(2011). Grounded theory and credibility. In Silverman

(Ed.), Qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 291–309). Sage.

Chaturvedi

Verma

Das

Dwivedi

Y. K.

(2023). Social companionship with artificial intelligence: Recent trends and future avenues. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 193, Article 122634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122634

10.

Chaturvedi

Verma

Srivastava

(2024). Empowering AI companions for enhanced relationship marketing. California Management Review, 66(2), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600

11.

Cheng

S. W.

Chang

C. W.

Chang

W. J.

Wang

H. W.

Liang

C. S.

Kishimoto

Chang

J. P.

Kuo

J. S.

K. P.

(2023). The now and future of ChatGPT and GPT in psychiatry. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 77(11), 592–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13588

12.

Chess

(2017). Ready player two: Women gamers and designed identity. University of Minnesota Press.

13.

Christoforakos

Feicht

Hinkofer

Löscher

Schlegl

S. F.

Diefenbach

(2021). Connect with me. Exploring influencing factors in a human–technology relationship based on regular chatbot use. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, Article 689999. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.689999

14.

Collins

Ghahramani

(2021, May 18). LaMDA: Our breakthrough conversation technology. Google: The Keyword. https://blog.google/technology/ai/lamda/

15.

Cristea

I. A.

Sucala

David

(2013). Can you tell the difference? Comparing face-to-face versus computer-based interventions. The “ELIZA” effect in psychotherapy. Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 13(2), 291–298. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1470800696?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals

16.

Danilava

Busemann

Schommer

(2012, February 6–8). Artificial conversational companions. A requirements analysis [Paper presentation]. 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003834702820289

17.

Derrida

(2016). Of grammatology ( Spivak

G. C.

, Trans). Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967)

18.

Elyoseph

Hadar-Shoval

Asraf

Lvovsky

(2023). ChatGPT outperforms humans in emotional awareness evaluations. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1199058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199058

19.

Elyoseph

Refoua

Asraf

Lvovsky

Shimoni

Hadar-Shoval

(2024). Capacity of generative AI to interpret human emotions from visual and textual data: Pilot evaluation study. JMIR Mental Health, 11, Article e54369. https://doi.org/10.2196/54369

20.

Evans

S. K.

Pearce

K. E.

Vitak

Treem

J. W.

(2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180

21.

Fasenfest

(Ed.). (2022). Marx matters. Brill.

22.

Fink

(1995). The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton University Press.

23.

Fink

(2017). The master signifier and the four discourses. In key concepts of Lacanian psychoanalysis. Routledge.

24.

Franzke

A. S.

Bechmann

Zimmer

Ess

C. M.

(2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf

25.

Ganzon

S. C.

(2019). Investing time for your in-game boyfriends and BFFs: Time as commodity and the simulation of emotional labor in Mystic Messenger. Games and Culture, 14(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018793068

26.

Giannakidou

Mari

(2024). The human and the mechanical: Logos, truthfulness, and ChatGPT. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01267

27.

Gibson

J. J.

(2014). The ecological approach to visual perception (Classic ed.). Psychology Press.

28.

Graves

(2007). The affordances of blogging: A case study in culture and technological effects. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 31(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859907305446

29.

Gupta

Nair

Mishra

Ibrahim

Bhardwaj

(2024). Adoption and impacts of generative artificial intelligence: Theoretical underpinnings and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(1), Article 100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100232

30.

Heidegger

(1992). History of the concept of time: Prolegomena. Indiana University Press.

31.

Hofstadter

D. R.

(1995). Fluid concepts & creative analogies: Computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought. Basic Books.

32.

Horton

Wohl

R. R.

(1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049

33.

Houtman

(2003). Lacan’s theory of the four discourses and the sixth sense. Journal for Cultural Research, 7(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479758032000135960

34.

(2011). Narrative structures in computer and video games: Part 1. Context, definitions, and initial findings. Games and Culture, 6(2), 103–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010364982

35.

Jonze

(Director). (2013). Her [Film]. Annapurna Pictures.

36.

Kalla

Smith

(2023). Study and analysis of Chat GPT and its impact on different fields of study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(3), 827–833. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4402499

37.

Koivula

Huttunen

Mustola

Lipponen

Laakso

M. L.

(2017). The emotion detectives game: Supporting the social-emotional competence of young children. In Ma

Oikonomou

(Eds.), Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 29–53). Springer.

38.

Lacan

(1972). On psychoanalytic discourse ( Stone

J. W.

, Trans.). https://lacanianworksexchange.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Microsoft-Word-Milan_Discourse2.pdf

39.

Lacan

(1977). The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis ( Miller

J. A.

, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429481826

40.

Lacan

(2001). Ecrits: A selection (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003059486

41.

Lacan

(2007). The seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book XVII. The other side of psychoanalysis ( Grigg

, Trans). W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published in 1991)

42.

Lan

(2023a). From surplus value to surplus data—Dialectical logic in the era of digital capitalism. Nanjing Social Sciences, 1, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2023.01.003

43.

Lan

(2023b). The new materialism and its historical limitations: The object of the age of intelligence from the ChatGPT phenomenon. Gansu Social Sciences, 4, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.15891/j.cnki.cn62-1093/c.20230706.001

44.

Levy

(2009). Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human–robot relationships. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 27(4), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2008.930875

45.

Cuomo

Purushothaman

Mackey

(2020). Data mining and content analysis of the Chinese social media platform Weibo during the early COVID-19 outbreak: Retrospective observational infoveillance study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), Article e18700. https://doi.org/10.2196/18700

46.

Wang

Xue

Zhao

Zhu

(2020). The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: A study on active Weibo users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), Article 2032. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062032

47.

Lieberman

Schroeder

(2020). Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.022

48.

Liu

(2024). ChatGPT: Perspectives from human–computer interaction and psychology. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 1418869. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1418869

49.

Luh

D. B.

E. C.

Kao

Y. J.

(2015). The development of a companionship scale for artificial pets. Interacting with Computers, 27(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwt055

50.

Lupton

(2016). Digital companion species and eating data: Implications for theorising digital data–human assemblages. Big Data & Society, 3(1), Article 205395171561994. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715619947

51.

McGowan

(2012). The end of dissatisfaction? Jacques Lacan and the emerging society of enjoyment. State University of New York Press.

52.

McMahon

C. R.

(1997). Hysterical academies: Lacan’s theory of the four discourses. International Journal: Language, Society, and Culture, 2, 1–20. https://aaref.com.au/2020/05/28/issue-2-1997/

53.

Murtarelli

Gregory

Romenti

(2021). A conversation-based perspective for shaping ethical human–machine interactions: The particular challenge of chatbots. Journal of Business Research, 129, 927–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.018

54.

Nagy

Neff

(2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385

55.

Olivier

(2009). Lacan on the discourse of capitalism; Critical prospects. Phronimon, 10(1), 25–42. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC87673

56.

Opdenakker

R. J. G.

(2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.4.175

57.

OpenAI. (2024, January 10). Usage policies. OpenAI. https://openai.com/policies/usage-policies

58.

Page

(2021, January). Attitudes to COVID-19 vaccines [Report]. Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2021-01/attitudes-to-covid-19-vaccines-ipsos.pdf

59.

Parker

(2013). Lacanian discourse analysis: Seven elements. In Parker

Pavón-Cuéllar

(Eds.), Lacan, discourse, event: New psychoanalytic approaches to textual indeterminacy (pp. 38–51). Routledge.

60.

Patulny

Lazarevic

Smith

(2020). “Once more, with feeling,” said the robot: AI, the end of work and the rise of emotional economies. Emotions and Society, 2(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1332/263168919X15750193136130

61.

Pavón-Cuéllar

(2011). Marx in Lacan: Proletarian truth in opposition to capitalist psychology. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 9, 70–77. https://discourseunit.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/pavoncuellar.pdf

62.

Pentina

Hancock

Xie

(2023). Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of Replika. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, Article 107600. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256231215838

63.

Preston

(2022). Artificial intelligence in the capitalist university: Academic labour, commodification, and value. Taylor & Francis.

64.

Ragland

(2006). The hysteric’s truth. In Clemens

Grigg

(Eds.), Jacques Lacan and the other side of psychoanalysis: Reflections on Seminar XVII, sic vi (pp. 69–87). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11vc7fb

65.

Ragland

(2018). Jacques Lacan’s capitalist discourse. Psychoanalytic Notebooks, 32. https://londonsociety-nls.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ragland-ellie_capitalist-discourse.pdf

66.

Rahmawati

Ruslan

Bandarsyah

(2021). The Era of Society 5.0 as the unification of humans and technology: A literature review on materialism and existentialism. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika, 16(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v16i2.2021.151-162

67.

Rasiński

(2011). The idea of discourse in poststructuralism: Derrida, Lacan and Foucault. Contemporary Learning Society, 1, 7–22. https://www.academia.edu/1366575/The_idea_of_discourse_in_poststructuralism_Derrida_Lacan_and_Foucault

68.

Rinon

(1993). The rhetoric of Jacques Derrida II: Phaedrus. The Review of Metaphysics, 46(3), 537–558. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20129374

69.

Rodríguez-Hidalgo

(2020). Me and my robot smiled at one another: The process of socially enacted communicative affordance in human-machine communication. Human-Machine Communication, 1(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.4

70.

Roumeliotis

K. I.

Tselikas

N. D.

(2023). ChatGPT and Open-AI models: A preliminary review. Future Internet, 15(6), Article 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060192

71.

Rudolph

Tan

(2023). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 364–389. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23

72.

Sacco

D. F.

Ismail

M. M.

(2014). Social belongingness satisfaction as a function of interaction medium: Face-to-face interactions facilitate greater social belonging and interaction enjoyment compared to instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.004

73.

Saito

(2021). From novels to video games: Romantic love and narrative form in Japanese visual novels and romance adventure games. Arts, 10(3), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts10030042

74.

Shawar

B. A.

Atwell

(2007). Chatbots: Are they really useful? Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics, 22(1), 29–49. https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/ldvf/ldvf22.html#ShawarA07

75.

Sheehan

(1985). Derrida and Heidegger. In Silverman

H. J.

Ihde

(Eds.), Hermeneutics and deconstruction (pp. 201–218). State University of New York Press.

76.

Shen

(2020). Twilight of the night: Lacan and the unfinished psychoanalytic revolution. National Taiwan University Press.

77.

Shum

H. Y.

X. D.

(2018). From ELIZA to XiaoIce: Challenges and opportunities with social chatbots. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 19, 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1700826

78.

Silverman

(2014). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed.). Sage.

79.

Strohmann

Siemon

Khosrawi-Rad

Robra-Bissantz

(2023). Toward a design theory for virtual companionship. Human–Computer Interaction, 38(3–4), 194–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2022.2084620

80.

Griffith

Boatfield

Wang

Civitello

Bader

Esther

Loggarakis

(2020). User experiences of social support from companion chatbots in everyday contexts: Thematic analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(3), Article e16235. https://doi.org/10.2196/16235

81.

Thorne

(2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 3(3), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.3.3.68

82.

Tomšič

(2015). The capitalist unconscious: Marx and Lacan. Verso Books.

83.

Tonts

(2018). Chatbots, will they ever be ready? Pragmatic shortcomings in communication with chatbots [Master’s thesis, Politecnico Di Milano]. Biblioteche e Archive. https://www.politesi.polimi.it/retrieve/a81cb05d-8c73-616b-e053-1605fe0a889a/2019_12_Tonts.pdf

84.

Townsend

Wallace

(2017). The ethics of using social media data in research: A new framework. In Woodfield

(Eds.), The ethics of online research (pp. 189–207). Emerald Publishing Limited.

85.

Tukachinsky

R. H.

(2011). Para-romantic love and para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale. American Journal of Media Psychology, 3(1/2), 73–94. http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/comm_articles/19

86.

Van Roy

Marché-Paillé

Geerardyn

Vanheule

. (2017). Reading Balint group work through Lacan’s theory of the four discourses. Health, 21(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459315628041

87.

Vanheule

(2016). Capitalist discourse, subjectivity and Lacanian psychoanalysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 224546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01948

88.

Vaswani

Shazeer

Parmar

Uszkoreit

Jones

Gomez

A. N.

Kaiser

Polosukhin

(2023). Attention is all you need. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/html/1706.03762v7

89.

Verhaeghe

(1995). From impossibility to inability: Lacan’s theory on the four discourses. The Letter: Lacanian Perspectives on Psychoanalysis, 3, 91–108. https://paulverhaeghe.psychoanalysis.be/artikels/From%20Impossibility%20to%20Inability.pdf

90.

Wolfe

(2010). Understanding critical literacy through Lacan’s four orders of discourse model. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544801003611201

91.

Xiao

(2022). Delida dui luogesizhongxinzhuyi de jiegou yu houjiegouzhuyi de yansheng [Derrida’s deconstruction of logocentrism and the derivation of post-structuralism]. Xinan Minzudaxue Xuebao, 43(8), 163–171.

92.

(2023). Female-oriented dating sims in China: Players’ parasocial relationships, gender attitudes, and romantic beliefs. Psychology of Popular Media, 12(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000386

93.

Zahira

S. I.

Maharani

Mohammad

(2023). Exploring emotional bonds: Human–AI interactions and the complexity of relationships. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1(1), 1–9. https://journal.chishikinh.my.id/index.php/serena/article/view/29

94.

Zhang

(2022). Platformed playworkers: Game video creators’ affective labour and emotional labour on Bilibili. Global Media and China, 7(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436422109649

95.

Zimmerman

Janhonen

Beer

(2023). Human/AI relationships: Challenges, downsides, and impacts on human/human relationships. AI and Ethics, 4, 1555–1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00348-8