Barbara Held’s article (2020) challenges the “for/about prepositional divide” (p. 349), which is presumed by critical and Indigenous psychologies, at two empirical and epistemological levels. I argue that Held’s critique can be further strengthened empirically, with reference to Lev Vygotsky’s analysis of the relation between spontaneous and scientific concepts, and epistemologically, with reference to Evald Ilyenkov’s treatment of concepts in contrast to mere notions.
AzeriS. (in press). Lexicon, “surplus-meaning,” and the constitution of abstract individuality. In KleiberG.HilgertE.PalmaS.KleiberG.FrathP.DavalR. (Eds.), Lexique et reference [Lexicon and reference]. Editions et Presses Universitaires de Reims.
2.
BooekerH. E. (1998). Concept – Meaning – Discourse. Begriffigeschichte Reconsidered. In Hami’siierI.TilmansK.Van VreeF. (Eds.), History of concepts: Comparative perspectives (pp. 51–64). Amsterdam University Press.
3.
ChristopherJ. C.WendtD. C.MarecekJ.GoodmanD. M. (2014). Critical cultural awareness: Contributions to a globalizing psychology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036851
4.
HeldB. S. (2020). Epistemic violence in psychological science: Can knowledge of, from, and for the (othered) people solve the problem?Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319883943
IlyenkovE. (2017). Dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Aakar Books.
9.
SundararajanL. (2014). Indigenous psychology: Grounding science in culture, why and how. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12054
10.
Task Force on Indigenous Psychology. (n.d.). Home. American Psychological Association, Division 32, Society for Humanistic Psychology. http://indigenouspsych.org/
11.
TeoT. (2018). Outline of theoretical psychology: Critical investigations. Palgrave.
12.
VygotskyL. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In RieberR.CartonA. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1, pp. 39–241). Plenum Press.
