A sociocultural framework illustrating Bakhtin’s theory of dialogicality informed this article’s interpretation of interviews with refugees discussing their parenting in exile. Multivoicedness is used as a tool for analysing how refugee parents talk about their evolving parenting practices; interview sequences from the parents of two families are presented. The culturally complex context of refugee parenting is understood in terms of transnational contact zones. Bakhtin’s concept of ideological becoming is used to understand how parenting evolves, making visible the parents’ critical assessment of unfamiliar practices, selective appropriation of certain practices, and agentic innovation of their own practices. The analysis adds relevant perspectives on professionals’ contact with refugee parents and may contribute to more culturally sensitive and less repressive treatment of parents while challenging facile conceptions of acculturation.
ÅbergL.MäkitaloÅ. (2017). Integration work as a situated communicative practice: Assuming, establishing and modifying cultural differences. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.07.002
2.
AvelingE.-L.GillespieA.CornishF. (2015). A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114557991
3.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.; HolquistM., Ed.). University of Texas Press.
4.
BakhtinM. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (EmersonC., Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
5.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). University of Texas press Slavic series: Vol. 8. Speech genres and other late essays (McGeeV. W., Trans.; HolquistM.EmersonC., Eds.). University of Texas Press.
6.
BakhtinM. M.MedvedevP. N. (1985). The formal method in literary scholarship: A critical introduction to sociological poetics. Harvard University Press.
7.
BallA. F.FreedmanS. W.PeaR.BrownJ. S.HeathC. (2004). Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning. Cambridge University Press.
8.
BangstadS.HellandF. (2019). The rhetoric of Islamophobia: An analysis of the means of persuasion in Hege Storhaug’s writings on Islam and Muslims. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(13), 2229–2247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1615630
9.
BehtouiA.OlssonE. (2014). The performance of early age migrants in education and the labour market: A comparison of Bosnia Herzegovinians, Chileans and Somalis in Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(5), 778–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.836958
10.
BergsetK. S.UlvikO. S. (2019). Parenting in exile: Refugee parents’ multivoiced narratives. International Social Work. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819825778
BhatiaS. (2002). Acculturation, dialogical voices and the construction of the diasporic self. Theory & Psychology, 12(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354302121004
13.
BhatiaS.RamA. (2001). Rethinking “acculturation” in relation to diasporic cultures and postcolonial identities. Human Development, 44(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1159/000057036
14.
BhatiaS.RamA. (2009). Theorizing identity in transnational and diaspora cultures: A critical approach to acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.12.009
15.
BrownP. (2005). Life in dispersal: Narratives of asylum, identity and community. University of Huddersfield.
16.
CarlingJ.ErdalM. B. (2014). Return migration and transnationalism: How are the two connected?International Migration, 52(6), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12180
17.
CresswellJ. (2009). Towards a post-critical praxis: Intentional states and recommendations for change in acculturation psychology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.12.005
18.
de HaanM. (2011). The reconstruction of parenting after migration: A perspective from cultural translation. Human Development, 54(6), 376–399. https://doi.org/10.1159/000334119
19.
EgnerT. (1949). Karius og Baktus [Karius and Baktus]. Cappelen.
20.
EliassiB. (2013). Orientalist social work: Cultural otherization of Muslim immigrants in Sweden. Critical Social Work, 14(1), 33–47.
21.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. SAGE.
22.
GulbrandsenL. M.ØsterengM. (2012). Barnevernets omsorgssentre for enslige, mindreårige asylsøkere: En arena for konstituering og formidling av norskhet [Care centers for unaccompanied asylum seeking children: Arenas for constituting and passing on Norwegianness]. Sosiologi I Dag, 41(3/4), 88–107.
23.
HaavindH. (2014). “Who does he think he is?” Meeting new friends and leaving others behind—On the path from childhood to youth. In SchottR. B.SøndergaardD. M. (Eds.), School bullying. New theories in context (pp. 129–158). Cambridge University Press.
24.
HermansH. J. M.KempenH. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. The American Psychologist, 53(10), 1111–1120.
25.
HollekimR.AnderssenN.DanielM. (2016). Contemporary discourses on children and parenting in Norway: Norwegian child welfare services meets immigrant families. Children and Youth Services Review, 60, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.004
26.
HolquistM. (1981). Glossary. In M. M. Bakhtin, The dialogic imagination (EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.; HolquistM., Ed.; pp. 423–434). University of Texas Press.
27.
HolsteinJ. A.GubriumJ. F. (2004). The active interview. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 140–161). SAGE.
28.
HundeideK. (2005). Socio-cultural tracks of development, opportunity situations and access skills. Culture & Psychology, 11(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0505235
29.
KeskinenS. (2011). Troublesome differences—Dealing with gendered violence, ethnicity, and “race” in the Finnish welfare state. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 12(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2011.622075
30.
KhawajaN. G.HebbaniA.ObijioforL.GalloisC. (2017). Refugee parents’ communication and relations with their children: Development and application of the refugee parent–child relational communication scale. Journal of Family Communication, 17(4), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2017.1362409
31.
KiangL.GlatzT.BuchananC. M. (2017). Acculturation conflict, cultural parenting self-efficacy, and perceived parenting competence in Asian American and Latino/a families. Family Process, 56(4), 943–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12266
32.
LarsenN. B. (2009). Institutional nationalism and orientalized others in parental education. In KeskinenS.TuoriS.IrniS.MulinariD. (Eds.), Complying with colonialism: Gender, race and ethnicity in the Nordic region (pp. 225–240). Routledge.
33.
LevittP.SchillerN. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x
MerryL.PelaezS.EdwardsN. C. (2017). Refugees, asylum-seekers and undocumented migrants and the experience of parenthood: A synthesis of the qualitative literature. Globalization and Health, 13(1), Article 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0299-4
36.
MorsonG. S. (2004). The process of ideological becoming. In BallA. F.FreedmanS. W. (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 317–331). Cambridge University Press.
37.
PhoenixA.SeuB. (2013). Negotiating daughterhood and strangerhood: Retrospective accounts of serial migration. Feminism and Psychology, 23(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353512473954
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
40.
SalamiB.HiraniS. A. A.MeheraliS.AmoduO.ChambersT. (2017). Parenting practices of African immigrants in destination countries: A qualitative research synthesis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 36, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2017.04.016
41.
SchillerN. G.BaschL.BlancC. S. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/3317464
42.
Statistisk Sentralbyrå Norwegian Statistics. (2012). Flyktninger etter landbakgrunn, region og botid, 1/1-2012 [Refugees sorted by country of origin, region and period of residence].
43.
StefansenK. (2007). Familiens rolle i reproduksjonen av ulikhet.Kunnskapsbidrag fra kvalitative studier av foreldreskap [The role of family in the reproduction of inequality: Contributions from qualitative studies of parenting]. Sosiologisk tidsskrift, 15(3), 245–264.
44.
TanggaardL. (2009). The research interview as a dialogical context for the production of social life and personal narratives. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(9), 1498–1515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800409343063
45.
Tardif-WilliamsC. Y.FisherL. (2009). Clarifying the link between acculturation experiences and parent–child relationships among families in cultural transition: The promise of contemporary critiques of acculturation psychology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.01.001
46.
UlvikO. S. (2018). Constructions of a culturally adequate child: Foster parents’ developmental goals and strategies for their foster children. In HedegaardM.AronssonK.HøjholtC.UlvikO. S. (Eds.), Children, childhood, and everyday life: Children’s perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 73–92). Information Age.
VincentC.BallS. J.KempS. (2004). The social geography of childcare: Making up a middle-class child. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000205091
49.
WertschJ. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
50.
WrightM.JohnstonR.CitrinJ.SorokaS.HelblingM.MichalowskiI. (2017). Multiculturalism and Muslim accommodation: Policy and predisposition across three political contexts. Comparative Political Studies, 50(1), 102–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015626448
51.
YılmazF. (2006). Ethnicized ontologies: From foreign worker to Muslim immigrant. How Danish public discourse moved to the right through the question of immigration [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California San Diego.
