The development of a theory of mechanistic explanation has been a welcome advance over previous theories of explanation, such as deductive nomological explanation. However, despite the claims of some supporters of mechanistic explanation, not all explanation in cognitive science is or should be mechanistic. I defend the claim that functional analysis remains a distinct and legitimate form of explanation within cognitive science.
BarrettD. (2014). Functional analysis and mechanistic explanation. Synthese, 191, 2695–2714.
2.
BechtelW. (2005). Explanation: A mechanistic alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 421–441.
3.
BechtelW.RichardsonR. (1993). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as scientific research strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
ChirimuutaM. (2014). Minimal models and canonical neural computations: The distinctness of computational explanation in neuroscience. Synthese, 191, 127–153.
5.
CraverC. (2006). When mechanistic models explain. Synthese, 153, 355–376.
6.
CraverC. (2007). Explaining the brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
CumminsR. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy, 72, 741–765.
8.
FodorJ. A. (1968). Psychological explanation. New York, NY: Random House.
9.
GlennanS. (2002). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 69, S342–S353.
10.
GlennanS. (2005). Modeling mechanisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36, 443–464.
11.
GlennanS. (2017). The new mechanical philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
HempelC. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York, NY: Free Press.
13.
KaplanD. (2011). Explanation and description in computational neuroscience. Synthese, 183, 339–373.
14.
KaplanD.CraverC. (2011). The explanatory force of dynamical and mathematical models in neuroscience: A mechanistic perspective. Philosophy of Science, 78, 601–627.
15.
MachamerP.DardenL.CraverC. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.
16.
PiccininiG.CraverC. (2011). Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese, 183, 283–311.
17.
PutnamH. (1975). Philosophy and our mental life. In PutnamH. (Ed.), Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2, pp. 291–303). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
PylyshynZ. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19.
RailtonP. (1978). A deductive-nomological model of probabilistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 45, 206–226.
20.
ShapiroL. (2017). Mechanism or bust? Explanation in psychology. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68, 1037–1059.
21.
SoberE. (1999). The multiple realizability argument against reductionism. Philosophy of Science, 66, 542–564.
22.
SternbergS. (1969). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421–457.
23.
WeiskopfD. (2011). Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation. Synthese, 183, 313–338.
24.
WoodwardJ. (2003). Making things happen. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
