This article describes various ways actors in Kashmiri carpet weaving practice deploy a range of artifacts, from symbolic, to material, to hybrid, in order to achieve diverse cognitive accomplishments in their particular task domains: information representation, inter and intra-domain communication, distribution of cognitive labor across people and time, coordination of team activities, and carrying of cultural heritage. In this repertoire, some artifacts position themselves as naïve tools in the actors’ environment to the point of being ignored; however, their usage-in-context unfolds their cognitive involvement in the tasks. These usages-in-context are shown through artifact analysis of their routine, improvised, and opportunistic uses, where cognitive artifacts like talim—the central artifact of this practice—are shown to play not only multifunctional roles beyond representation, but are also complemented by trade-specific skills bearing strong cognitive implications in a task.
BellottiV.RogersY. (1997). From web press to web pressure: Multimedia representations and multimedia publishing. In PembertonS. (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM-SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 279–286). Atlanta, GA: Association for Computing Machinery.
4.
BergM.BowkerG. (1997). The multiple bodies of the medical record: Toward a sociology of an artifact. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(3), 513–537.
5.
BoguslawR.PorterE. H. (1962). Team functions and training. In GagneR. M. (Ed.), Psychological principles in system development (pp. 387–416). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6.
BrockmoleJ. R.DavoliC. C.AbramsR. A.WittJ. K. (2013). The world within reach: Effects of hand posture and tool use on visual cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 38–44. doi: 10.1177/0963721412465065
7.
DellantonioS.MulattiC.JobR. (2013). Artifact and tool categorization. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 407–408. doi: 10.1007/s13164–013–0140–9
8.
DubbelsB. (2011). Cognitive ethnography: A methodology for measure and analysis of learning for game studies. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 3(1), 68–78. doi: 10.4018/jgcms.2011010105
9.
EngestromY. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
GarbisC.WaernY. (1999). Team coordination and communication in a rescue command staff: The role of public representations. Le Travail Humain, 62(3), 273–295.
11.
GermanT. P.BarrettH. C. (2005). Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science, 16(1), 1–5.
12.
GilbrethF. B. (1911). Motion study: A method for increasing the efficiency of the workman. New York, NY: Van Nostran.
13.
GoodwinC. (1997). The blackness of black: Color-categories as situated practice. In ResnickL. B.SaljoR.PontecorvoC.BurgeB. (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 111–140). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
14.
GoodwinC.GoodwinM. H. (1996). Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In EngestromY.MiddletonD. (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GoswamiK. K. (2009). Developments in handmade carpets: Introduction. In GoswamiK. K. (Ed.), Advances in carpet manufacture (pp. 138–181). Oxford, UK: Woodhead.
16.
GursesA. P.XiaoY.HuP. (2009). User-designed information tools to support communication and care coordination in a trauma hospital. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(4), 667–677. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.03.007
17.
HarrisP. (1991). The Kashmir shawl: Lessons in history and studies in technology. Ars Textrina, 16, 105–127.
HarrisP. (2000). Decoding the talim. Hali, 110, 82–83.
20.
HeersminkR. (2013). A taxonomy of cognitive artifacts: Function, information, and categories. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4, 465–481. doi: 10.1007/s13164–013–0148–1
21.
HindmarshJ.HeathC. (2000). Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523-562. doi: 10.1177/089124100129023990
22.
HutchinsE. (1990). The technology of team navigation. In GalegherJ.KrautR. E.EgidoC. (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 191–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
HutchinsE. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
24.
HutchinsE. (2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human cognition. In EnfieldN. J.LevinsonS. C. (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 375–398). Oxford, UK: Berg.
25.
KahrsB. A.LockmanJ. J. (2014). Tool using. Child Development Perspectives, 8(4), 231–236. doi:10.1111/cdep.12087
26.
KhanF. A. (1993). Cognitive organization and work activity: A study of carpet-weavers in Kashmir. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 15(2), 48–53.
27.
KirshD. (1995). The intelligence use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31–68. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-U
28.
KirshD. (2008). Distributed cognition: A methodological note. In DrorI. E.HarnadS. (Eds.), Cognition distributed: How cognitive technology extends our minds (pp. 57–70). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
29.
LaveJ. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
LaveJ.MurtaughM.de la RochaO. (1984). The dialectics of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In RogoffB.LaveJ. (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
LawrenceW. (1893). The valley of Kashmir. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
LeitnerG. W. (1882). Linguistic fragments discovered in 1870, 1872 and 1879 relating to the dialect of the Magadds, and other wandering tribes, the argots of thieves, the secret of trade-dialects and systems of native cryptography in Kabul, Kashmir and the Punjab followed by an account of shawl-weaving. Lahore, Pakistan: Punjab Govt. Civil Secretariat Press.
33.
LeontievA. N. (1979). The problem of activity in psychology. In WerstchJ. V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). New York, NY: M. F. Sharpe. (Original work published 1972)
34.
MackayW. E. (1999). Is paper safer? The role of paper flight strips in air traffic control. In GrudinJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of ACM transactions on computer-human interaction, 6(4), 311–340.
35.
MaltB. C.SlomanS. A. (2006). Artifact categorization: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In MargolisE.LaurenceS. (Eds.), Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation (pp. 85–123). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
MathurA. (2004). Indian carpets: A hand-knotted heritage. New Delhi, India: Rupa & Co.
37.
MoorcroftW.TrebeckG. (1841). Travels in the Himalayan provinces of Hindustan and the Punjab, in Ladakh and Kashmir; in Peshawar, Kabul, Kunduz, and Bokhara: From 1819 to 1825 (Vol. 2). London, UK: John Murray.
38.
NemethC. P.CookR. I. (2013). Artifact analysis as a route to understand cognition. In LeeJ. D.KirlikA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering (pp. 302–314). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
NomuraS.HutchinsE.HolderB. E. (2006). The uses of paper in commercial airline flight operations. In Proceedings of CSCW’06 (pp. 249–258). Banff, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.
40.
NormanD. A. (1991). Cognitive artifacts. In CarrollJ. M. (Ed.), Designing interaction (pp. 17–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
PorterE. H. (1987). The parable of the spindle. Clinical Sociology Review, 5(1), 33–44.
42.
ReedC. LBetzR.GarzaJ. P.RobertsR. J.Jr. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 72(1), 236–245. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.1.236
43.
SarafD. N. (1990). Carpets. In JaitlyJ. (Ed.), Crafts of Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh (pp. 81–98). Middletown, NJ: Grantha Corporation with Mapin Publishing.
44.
SuchmanL. A. (1997). Centres of coordination: A case and some themes. In ResnickL. B.SaljoR.PontecorvoC.BurgeB. (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 41–62). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
45.
SuchmanL. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
VaesenK. (2012). The cognitive basis of human tool use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 203–262. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001452
48.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
WilliamsR. F. (2006). Using cognitive ethnography to study instruction. In BarabS. A.HayK. E.HickeyD. T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 838–844). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
