This paper arises from the need to explain expert decision-making in professional environments from a plural and interdisciplinary perspective. An extended review of Rational Choice Theory (RCT) from its first developments to current trends makes explicit the mismatch between RCT and empirical work settings. A review of recent theories on the cognitive abilities of agents makes clear the lack of integration between findings in evolutionary psychology, cognitive science, perceptual psychology and neurology, and those proposed by RCT. We will examine the causes for the failure of Good Old Fashioned Artificial Intelligence (GOFAI), the strongest empirical program for testing RCT premises. Contributions from the cognitive and social sciences put forward the weaknesses of analytical sociology at all four levels: the biological, the psychological, the epistemological, and the ontological. Alternative explanations from contemporary cognitive science will be put forward.
AlacM. (2005). Widening the wideware: An analysis of multimodal interaction in scientific practice. In BaraB. G.BarsalouL.BucciarelliM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 85–91). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
AppignanesiL. (2009). Mad, bad and sad: A history of women and the mind doctors from 1800. London, UK: Virago.
3.
AxelrodR. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
4.
BachelardG. (1986). The new scientific spirit. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
5.
BarkowJ. H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.). (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BarsalouL.W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5/6), 513–562.
7.
BorelE. (1938). Traité du calcul des probabilités et ses applications: Vol. IV. Applications aux jeux des hazard (Fascicle 2) [Treaty of probability and its applications: Vol. IV. Applications to games of chance]. Paris, France: Gautier-Villars.
BourdieuP. (1998). Les regles de l’art [The rules of art]. Paris, France: Seuil.
11.
BoyerD. (2005). The corporeality of expertise. Ethnos, 70, 243–266.
12.
CarlsonL.HoelscherC.ShipleyT. F. (Eds.). (2011). Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX:Cognitive Science Society.
13.
CarrE. S. (2010). Enactments of expertise. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 17–32.
14.
CarruthersP.StichS.SiegalM. (Eds.). (2002). The cognitive basis of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ChandrasekharanS.OsbeckL. (2010). Rethinking situatedness: Environment structure in the time of the common code. Theory & Psychology, 20, 171–207.
16.
ChaseW.SimonH. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–81.
17.
ChurchlandP. M. (1995). The engine of reason, the seat of the soul. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
ClarkA. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
ClarkA. (2001). Mindware. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
ClarkA. (2008a). Pressing the flesh: A tension in the study of the embodied, embedded mind?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76(1), 37–59.
21.
ClarkA. (2008b). Supersizing the mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
ColemanJ. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
CollinsH. (1994). Dissecting surgery: Forms of life depersonalized. Social Studies of Science, 24, 311–333.
24.
DamasioA. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York, NY: Macmillan.
25.
D’AndradeR. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
DreyfusH. L. (1979). What computers still can’t do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DreyfusH. L.DreyfusS. E. (1986). Mind over machine. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
29.
DurkheimE. (1998). Les formes élementaires de la vie religieuse [Elementary forms of religious life]. Paris, France: Quadrige/PUF. (Original work published 1912)
30.
ElsterJ. (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
FauconnierG.TurnerM. (2002). The way we think. New York, NY: Basic Books.
32.
GarbisC.ArtmanH. (1998). Team communication and co-ordination as distributed cognition. In DarsesF.ZarateP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP ‘98). Rocquencourt, France: INRIA Press.
33.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Los Angeles, CA: Polity Press.
GibbsR. W.Jr. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36.
GigerenzerG. (2008). Rationality for mortals. How people cope with uncertainty. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
GigerenzerG. (2010). Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20, 733–743.
38.
GigerenzerG.SturmT. (2010). How (far) can rationality can be naturalized?Synthèse, 187, 243–268.
39.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylums. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
40.
GoodwinC. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 603–633.
41.
GriggsR. A.CoxJ. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason’s selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407–420.
42.
GroopmanJ. (2007). How doctors think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
43.
HarréR.GillettG. (1994). The discursive mind. London, UK: Sage.
44.
HastieR.DawesR. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgement and decision making. London, UK: Sage.
45.
HollanJ.HutchinsE.KirshD. (2000). Distributed cognitions: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions On Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174–196.
46.
HutchinsE. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
HutchinsE. (2001). Cognition, distributed. In SmelserN.BaltesP. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2968–2072). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
48.
HutchinsE. (2006). Imagining the cognitive life of things. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute, Cambridge University.
49.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1974). The concept of probability in psychological experiments. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
50.
KalishD.MontagueR. (1964). Logic: Techniques of formal reasoning. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.
51.
KirshD. (1991). Today the earwig, tomorrow man?Artificial Intelligence, 47, 161–184.
52.
KirshD. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31–68.
53.
KirshD. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI and Society, 25, 441–454.
54.
KirshD.MaglioP. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.
55.
Knorr-CetinaK. (1999). Epistemic cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
LeeM.SteyversS.DeYoungM.MillerB. (2011). A model-based approach to measuring expertise in ranking tasks. In CarlsonL.HoelscherC.ShipleyT. F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
58.
LuhrmannT. M. (2001). Of two minds. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
MiettinenR. (2006). The source of novelty: A cultural and systemic view of distributed creativity. Sources of Novelty, 15(2), 173–181.
61.
MinskyM. (1968). Semantic information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62.
MiyakeN.PeeblesD.CooperR. P. (Eds.). (2012). Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
63.
MontgomeryK. (2006). How doctors think: Clinical judgement and the practice of medicine. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64.
MuntanyolaD. (2011). Creative choice in dance rehearsals: A new qualitative methodology. In CarlsonL.HoelscherC.ShipleyT. F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
65.
MuntanyolaD. (2012). Expert knowledge and video-aided ethnography: A methodological account. Révue de Synthèse, 133(1), 75–100. doi: 10.1007/s11873-012-0176-x
66.
MuntanyolaD.KirshD. (2010). Marking as physical thinking: A cognitive ethnography of dance. Proceedings of the IWCogSc-10 ILCLI International Workshop on Cognitive Science. Donostia, Spain: Universidad del Pais Vasco, Servicio de Publicaciones.
67.
MyersN. (2008). Molecular embodiment and the body-work of modeling in protein crystallography. Social Studies of Science, 38(2), 163–199.
68.
NormanD. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
69.
NuñezR. (1995). What brain for God’s eye? Biological naturalism, ontological objectivism, and Searle. Journal Of Consciousness Studies, 2(2), 149–166.
70.
OhlssonS.CatramboneR. (Eds.). (2010). Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
71.
OlsonM. (1971). The logic of collective action. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
PerryM. (1999). The application of individually and socially distributed cognition in workplace studies: Two peas in a pod? In BagnaraS. (Ed.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science, 1999 (pp. 87–92). Siena, Italy.
73.
PoeE. A. (1977). The purloined letter. In The portable E. A. Poe (pp. 327–344). New York, NY: Penguin. (Original work published 1845)
74.
PoundstoneW. (1992). El dilema del prisionero [The prisoner’s dilemma]. Madrid, Spain: Alianza.
75.
PremackD. (2004). Is language the key to human intelligence. Science, 303(5656), 318–320.
76.
PylyshynZ. (2003). Seeing and visualizing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77.
RamachandranV. S.BlakesleeS. (1998). Phantoms in the brain: Probing the mysteries of the human mind. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
78.
ResnickM. (1994). Learning about life. Artificial Life, 1(1–2), 229–241.
79.
RobertsJ. M. (1987). Within culture variation: A restrospective personal view. American Behavioral Scientist, 31(2), 266–279.
80.
RumelhartD. E. (1989). The architecture of mind: A connectionist approach. In PosnerM. (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp.133–159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81.
SawyerK. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82.
SchankR. C. (1975). Conceptual information processing. New York, NY: Elsevier.
83.
SchankR. C.ClearyC. (1995). Engines for education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
SilversteinM. (2006). Old wine, new lexicography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 481–496.
86.
SimmelG. (1971). The problem of sociology. In LevineD., Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms (pp. 23–35). Chicago, IL: University Chicago University Press. (Original work published 1908)
87.
SimonH. (1969). The architecture of complexity: Hierarchic systems. In The sciences of the artificial (pp. 183–216). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88.
SimonH. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69, 493–513.
89.
SimonH. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
SimonH.KaplanC. (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In PosnerM. (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 1–45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92.
SkinnerB. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.
93.
ThelenE.SmithL. (1994). Dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
94.
ToddP.GigerenzerG. (2007). Environments that make us smart. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 167–171.
95.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In BarkowJ. H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
96.
TurnerM. (2001). Cognitive dimensions of social science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
97.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
98.
Van HezewijkR. (2004). Waking up from the dream of reason: Rationality in the real world. Theory & Psychology, 14, 261–272.
99.
Von NeumannJ.MorgensternO. (1944). The theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
100.
WasonP. C. (1966). Reasoning. In FossB. (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 135–151). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
101.
WeizenbaumJ. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36–45. doi: 10.1145/365153.365168
102.
WengerE. (1998). Community of practice learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 1–10.
103.
WilliamsR. (1985). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
104.
WinogradT. (1972). Understanding natural language. New York, NY: Academic Press.
