In this article, I argue that Kierkegaard’s analysis of the self and the concept of despair introduces another approach to the self that is different from the one found in humanistic psychology. Rather than seeing the self as something organic, something universally and privately given to the individual to develop, Kierkegaard presented a dialectical and a relational understanding of the self, wherein the notion of “the other” is central. Central in Kierkegaard’s analysis in Sickness Unto Death are two modalities when it comes to despair: the despair of not willing to be oneself and the despair of willing to be oneself. Kierkegaard’s analysis of the despair of willing to be oneself can be read as a strong critique of the notion of self being constituted by itself, as argued by humanistic psychology.
BarkerK. (2014). Mindfulness meditation: Do-it-yourself medicalization of every moment. Social Science & Medicine, 106, 168–176.
2.
BinkleyS. (2011). Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal governmentality. Subjectivity, 4, 371–397.
3.
BovbjergK. (2005). Selvrealisering i arbejdslivet [Self-realization in work life]. In BrinkmannS.EriksenC. (Eds.), Selvrealisering—kritiske diskussioner af en grænseløs udviklingskultur [Self-realization—Critical discussion of a borderless developmental culture] (pp. 15–41). Aarhus, Denmark: Klim.
4.
BrinkmannS. (2005). The ethics of self-realization. In BrinkmannS.EriksenC. (Eds.), Selvrealisering—kritiske diskussioner af en grænseløs udviklingskultur [Self-realization—Critical discussion of a borderless developmental culture] (pp. 41–65). Aarhus, Denmark: Klim.
5.
BrinkmannS. (2008). Changing psychologies in the transition from industrial society to consumer society. History of the Human Sciences, 21(2), 85–110.
6.
BühlerC.AllenM. (1972). Introduction to humanistic psychology. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
7.
CaputoJ. (1995). Instants, secrets, and singularities: Dealing death in Kierkegaard and Derrida. In WestphalM.MatustikM. (Eds.), Kierkegaard in post/modernity (pp. 239–265). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
ColaizziP. (1978). Learning and existence. In ValledR. S.KingM. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 64–87). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
DerridaJ. (1992). “Donner la mort.” L’Éthique du don: Jacques Derrida et la pensée du don [Giving death. The ethics of the gift: Jacques Derrida and the thought of the gift]. Paris, France: Métailié-Transition.
10.
EvansK. (1990). Søren Kierkegaard’s Christian psychology: Insights for counseling and pastoral care. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
11.
FletcherD. B. (1982). Social and political perspectives in the thought of Soren Kierkegaard. Washington, DC: United Press of America.
12.
GellerL. (1982). The failure of self-actualization theory: A critique of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 22(2), 56–73.
13.
GuisingerS.BlattS. J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness. American Psychologist, 49(2), 104–111.
HabermasJ. (1995). Communicative freedom and negative theology. In WestphalM.MatustikM. (Eds.), Kierkegaard in post/modernity (pp. 182–199). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
16.
HagenbloomS. J. (2002). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 139–152.
17.
JørgensenC. R. (2002). Find dig selv. Realiser dig selv. Konstruér dig: selvet i senmoderne selvhjælpslitteratur og psykoterapi [Find yourself, actualize yourself, construct yourself: The self in late modernity self-help literature and psychotherapy]. Psyke og Logos, 23(1), 106–143.
18.
JørgensenC. R. (2005). The cult of self-realization’s clinical roots. In BrinkmannS.EriksenC. (Eds.), Selvrealisering—kritiske diskussioner af en grænseløs udviklingskultur [Self-realization—Critical discussion of a borderless developmental culture] (pp. 159–187). Aarhus, Denmark: Klim.
19.
KierkegaardS. (1967). The concept of dread (LowrieW., Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1844)
20.
KierkegaardS. (1978). Two ages: The age of revolution and the present age, a literary review (HongH. V.HongE. H., Eds. & Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1846)
21.
KierkegaardS. (1980). The sickness unto death: A Christian psychological exposition for upbuilding and awakening (HongH. V.HongE. H., Eds. & Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1849)
22.
KierkegaardS. (1983). Fear and trembling and repetition (HongH. V.HongE. H., Eds. & Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1843)
23.
KvaleS. (2003). The church, the factory and the market: Scenarios for psychology in a postmodern age. Theory & Psychology, 13, 579–603.
24.
LethbridgeD. (1986). A Marxist theory of self-actualization. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 26(2), 84–103.
MacIntyreA. (2004). After virtue. London, UK: Duckworth.
27.
MarshJ. L. (1995). Kierkegaard and critical theory. In WestphalM.MatustikM. (Eds.), Kierkegaard in post/modernity (pp. 199–216). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
28.
MaslowA. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
29.
MaslowA. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
30.
MaslowA. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York, NY: The Viking.
31.
MatustikM. (1995). Kierkegaard’s radical existential praxis, or why the individual defies liberal, communitarian, and postmodern categories. In WestphalM.MatustikM. (Eds.), Kierkegaard in post/modernity (pp. 216–239). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
32.
MayR. (1960). Existential psychology. New York, NY: Random House.
33.
MayR. (1969). Love and will. London, UK: Norton & Company.
34.
MayR.AngelE.EllenbergH. F. (1958). Existence: A new dimension in psychiatry and psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35.
Moe RasmussenA. (1983). En sammenlignende analyse af eksistens begrebet hos Kierkegaard og den tidlige Heidegger [A comparison analysis of the concept of existence in Kierkegaard and Heidegger’s early work]. Prisopgave, Denmark: Aarhus University.
36.
MorrisJ. E. (1979). Kierkegaard’s concept of subjectivity and implications for humanistic psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 19(3), 57–79.
37.
MossD. (2001). The roots and genealogy of human psychology. In SchneiderK. J.BugenthalJ. F. T.Fraser PiersonJ. F. (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology: Leading edges in theory, research, and practice (pp. 5–20). London, UK: Sage.
38.
NielsenK. (2003). The wisdom of the empty places. Methods: A Journal for Human Science, (annual ed.), 29–42.
39.
NielsenK. (2006). Den kyniske følsomhed: Bekendelse og disciplinering i dansk pædagogik [The cynical sensitivity: Confession and discipline in Danish pedagogic]. Kritisk Forum for Praktisk Teologi, 106, 29–40.
40.
NordentoftK. (1977). Kierkegaard—Bidrag til kritikken af den borgerlige selvoptagethed [Kierkegaard – A contribution to the critique of bourgeois self-absorption]. København, Denmark: Universitetsforlaget.
NorrisC. (1982). Deconstruction: Theory and practice. London, UK: Routledge.
43.
OaksC. L. (2016). “How am I not myself?” Despair in Sickness Unto Death as misguided attempts toward self-actualization. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(2), 110–121.
44.
PetersM. (2001). Education, enterprise culture and the entrepreneurial self: A Foucauldian perspective. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(2), 58–71.
45.
PodmoreS. D. (2009). Kierkegaard as physician of the soul: On self-forgiveness and despair. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37(3), 174–185.
46.
ReberJ. S. (2006). Secular psychology: What’s the problem?Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 193–204.
47.
RogersC. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
48.
RogersC. R.FreibergH. J. (1994). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Macmillan.
49.
SaugstadT. (2005). Den deforme humanisme [The deformed humanism]. In BrinkmannS.EriksenC. (Eds.), Selvrealisering—kritiske diskussioner af en grænseløs udviklingskultur [Self-realization—Critical discussion of a borderless developmental culture] (pp. 187–211). Aarhus, Denmark: Klim.
50.
ShragO. C. (1995). The Kierkegaard effect in the shaping of the contours of modernity. In WestphalM.MatustikM. (Eds.), Kierkegaard in post/modernity (pp. 1–18). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
51.
SlifeB. D.ReberJ. S. (2009). Is there a pervasive implicit bias against theism in psychology?Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 29, 63–79.
52.
TheunissenM. (1980). Sein and Schein. Die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik [Being and seeing. The critical function of Hegelian logic]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft.
53.
TheunissenM. (1981). Kierkegaard’s negativistic method. In SmithJ. H. (Ed.), Kierkegaard’s truth: The disclosure of the self, psychiatry, and the humanities (5th ed., pp. 381–423). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
TheunissenM. (2005). Kierkegaard’s concept of despair. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
