The idea that units of culture may act as a virus controlling some of the perceptions and actions of individuals has been the subject of considerable controversy since proposed by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins. This debate has occurred in the absence of a defined mental viral structure or a target body upon which such viral structures may act. This article develops a paradigm in which the self is understood as such a body upon which future research into “mind viruses” may be undertaken. Possible mechanisms for mind-viral transmission are discussed. Criteria for defining a mental virus are used to examine evidence of possible mind-virus contagion in suicides, suicide cults, terrorism, and religion.
AbadianS. (2006). Cultural healing: When cultural renewal is reparative and when it is toxic. Pimatisiwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 4(2), 5–27.
2.
AtranS. (2001). The trouble with memes: Inference versus imitation in cultural creation. Human Nature, 12(4), 351–381.
3.
AtranS. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BarkerE. (1986). Religous movements: Cult and anticult since Jonestown. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 329–346.
5.
BarresiJ. (2002). From “the thought is the thinker” to “the voice is the speaker”: William James and the dialogic self. Theory & Psychology, 12, 237–252. doi: 10.1177/0959354302012002632
6.
BlackmoreS. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
BlackmoreS. (2000). The power of memes. Scientific American, 283(4), 64–69.
8.
BlackmoreS. (2002). There is no stream of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5–6), 17–28.
9.
BoydR.RichardsonP. (2000). Meme theory oversimplifies how culture changes. Scientific American, 283(4), 70–72.
10.
BrodieR. (1996). Virus of the mind: The new science of the meme. Carlsbad, CA: Hay House.
11.
BurmanJ. T. (2012). The misunderstanding of memes: Biography of an unscientific object, 1976–1999. Perspectives on Science, 20(1), 75–104.
12.
BurnsJ. M.PattonG. C.BurnsJ. (2000). Preventive interventions for youth suicide: A risk factor-based approach. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34(3), 388–407.
13.
CampbellJ. (2004). The hero with a thousand faces (Commemorative ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
CarrollJ. (2005). Literature and evolutionary psychology. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 931–952). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
CooperS. L.LezotteD.JacobellisJ.DiGuiseppiC. (2006). Does availability of mental health resources prevent recurrent suicidal behavior? An ecological analysis. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 36(4), 409–417.
16.
CornetteM. M.StraumanT. J.AbramsonL. Y.BuschA. M. (2009). Self-discrepancy and suicidal ideation. Cognition & Emotion, 23(3), 504–527.
17.
CoyneJ. A. (1999, April). The self-centred meme. Nature, 398, 767–768.
18.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1993). The evolving self: A psychology for the third millennium. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
19.
DamasioA. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, NY: Harcourt.
20.
DawkinsR. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
DawkinsR. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford, UK: W. H. Freeman.
DawkinsR. (2006). The god delusion. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
de ManA. F.Becerril GutierrezB. I. (2002). The relationship between level of self-esteem and suicidal ideation with stability of self-esteem as moderator. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34(4), 235–238. doi: 10.1037/h0087176
25.
DennettD. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
26.
DennettD. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
27.
DennettD. C. (1996). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
DistinK. (2005). The selfish meme: A critical reassessment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
DonaldM. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York, NY: Norton.
30.
EltzM.EvansA. S.CelioM.DylJ.HuntJ.ArmstrongL.SpiritoA. (2007). Suicide probability scale and its utility with adolescent psychiatric patients. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 38(1), 17–29.
31.
Eungi KimA. (2004). Religious influences on personal and societal well-being. Social Indicators Research, 62–63(1–3), 149–170.
32.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2010). Of memes and marriage: Toward a positive relationship science. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2(1), 4–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1756–2589.2010.00033.x
33.
FreidmanD.SingN. (2004). Negative reciprocity: The co-evolution of memes and genes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(3), 155–173.
34.
GaboraL. (2004). Ideas are not replicators but minds are. Biology and Philosophy, 19(1), 127–143.
35.
GazzanigaM. S. (2000). Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition?Brain, 137(7), 1293–1326. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.7.1293
36.
GolemanD. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. New York, NY: Bantam.
37.
GouldS. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
38.
HallJ. R. (1987). Gone from the promised land: Jonestown in American cultural history. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
39.
HarréR. (1998). The singular self: An introduction to the psychology of personhood. London, UK: SAGE.
40.
HarterS. (2012). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
HeathC.BellC.SternbergE. (2001). Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81(6), 1028–1041.
42.
HensonH. K. (2002). Sex, drugs, and cults. An evolutionary psychology perspective on why and how cult memes get a drug-like hold on people, and what might be done to mitigate the effects. The Human Nature Review, 2, 343–355.
43.
HertoghC. M. P. M.De BoerM. E.DrallesR.-M.EefstingJ. A. (2007). Would we rather lose our life than lose our self? Lessons from the Dutch debate on euthanasia for patients with dementia. American Journal of Bioethics, 7(4), 48–56.
44.
HofferE. (1966). True believer (First Perennial Library ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1951)
45.
HvidM.WangA. G. (2009). Preventing repetition of attempted suicide: Feasibility (acceptability, adherence, and effectiveness) of a Baerum-model like aftercare. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 63(2), 148–153.
46.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). London, UK: Macmillan.
47.
JaynesJ. (1976). The origins of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
48.
JohnsonD. M. (2003). How history made mind: The cultural origins of objective thinking. Chicago, IL: Open Court Books.
49.
KamhiA. G. (2008). A meme’s-eye view of nonspeech oral-motor exercises. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29(4), 131–138.
50.
LauerS.de ManA. F.MarquezS.AdesJ. (2008). External locus of control, problem-focused coping and attempted suicide. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 625–632.
51.
LesterD.WalkerR. L. (2007). Hopelessness, helplessness, and haplessness as predictors of suicidal ideation. Omega: Journal of Death & Dying, 55(4), 321–324.
52.
LoganR. K. (2008). The extended mind: The emergence of language, the human mind, and culture. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
NietzscheF. (2003). Beyond good and evil: Prelude to a philosophy of the future (ZimmernH., Trans.). Project Gutenberg Etext # 4363. Retrieved from http://www.searchengine.org.uk/pdfs/5/656.pdf
55.
NishidaK. (1990). An inquiry into the good (AbeM.IvesC., Trans.). London, UK: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1921)
56.
PinkerS. (1997). How the mind works. New York, NY: Norton.
57.
ProgovacL. (2016). A gradualist scenario for language evolution: Precise linguistic reconstruction of early human (and neandertal) grammars. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1714), 1–14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01714
58.
RayD. W. (2009). The god virus: How religion infects our lives and culture. Bonner Springs, KS: IPC Press.
59.
RinpocheS. (1993). The Tibetan book of living and dying. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
60.
RobertsonL. H. (2007). Reflections on the use of spirituality to privilege religion in scientific discourse: Incorporating considerations of self. Journal of Religion and Health, 46(3), 449–461.
61.
RobertsonL. H. (2010). Mapping the self with units of culture. Psychology, 1(3), 185–193. doi: 10.4236/psych.2010.13025
62.
RobertsonL. H. (2011). Self-mapping in treating suicide ideation: A case study. Death Studies, 35(3), 267–280. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2010.496687
63.
RobertsonL. H. (2014a). In search of the aboriginal self: Four individual perspectives. Sage Open, 4(2), 1–13. doi: 10.1177/2158244014534246
64.
RobertsonL. H. (2014b). Native spirituality: The making of a new religion. Humanist Perspectives, 47(1), 16–23.
65.
RobertsonL. H. (2016). Self-mapping in counselling: Using memetic maps to enhance client reflectivity and therapeutic efficacy. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 50(3), 332–347.
66.
RodriguezA.CalderaT.KullgrenG.RenbergE. (2006). Suicidal expressions among young people in Nicaragua. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41(9), 692–697.
67.
SeigelJ. (2005). The idea of the self: Thought and experience in Western Europe since the seventeenth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
SomervilleM. (2006). The ethical imagination: Journeys of the human spirit. Toronto, Canada: House of Anansi Press.
69.
UddinL. Q.DaviesM. S.ScottA. A.ZaidelE.BookheimerS. Y.LacoboniM.DaprettoM. (2008). Neural basis of self and other representation in autism: An fMRI study of self-face recognition. PLoS One, 3(10), e3526, 1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003526
70.
WhiteL. (1990). Four stages in the evolution of minding. In PickeringJ.SkinnerM. (Eds.), From sentience to symbols: Readings on consciousness (pp. 173–182). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1969)
71.
WilsonE. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
