Crisis, as a construct, recurs in the history of psychology and has attracted the attention of psychological historians and philosophers in recent years, who have given life not only to a debate about psychological historiography, but also to a philosophical-epistemological reflection about the foundations of scientific psychology. These scholars, however, ignore the Italian literature on the theme, which is rich with useful details for both areas. After an analysis of the different meanings historically applied to the term crisis, this article examines the history of Italian psychology with a description of the origins and developments and with special attention paid to the construct of crisis. The analysis covers both the output of early 20th-century Italian psychologists on the theme, and how this has been treated in historians’ reconstruction of the theme. The article provides new historiographical elements within the framework of international research on the crisis.
AlbertazziL.CiminoG.Gori-SaveliniS. (1994). Francesco De Sarlo e il laboratorio fiorentino di psicologia [Francesco De Sarlo and the Fiorentine psychological laboratory]. Bari, Italy: Laterza.
2.
AliottaA. (1905). La misura in psicologia sperimentale [Measurement in experimental psychology]. Florence, Italy: Galletti e Cocci.
3.
AliottaA. (1912). La reazione idealistica contro la scienza [The idealistic reaction against science]. Palermo, Italy: Optima.
4.
AliottaA. (1914). The idealist reaction against science. London, UK: Macmillan.
5.
AliottaA. (1954). Il nuovo positivismo e lo sperimentalismo [New positivism and experimentalism]. Rome, Italy: Edizioni Cremonese.
6.
AlleschC. G. (2012). Hans Driesh and the problems of “normal psychology”: Rereading his Crisis in Psychology (1925). Studies in History and Philosophy of Biomedical Sciences – Part C, 43(2), 455–461.
7.
ArdigòR. (1870). La psicologia come scienza positiva [Psychology as a positivist science]. Mantova, Italy: Guastalla.
8.
AshM. (1980). Wilhelm Wundt and Oswald Külpe on the institutional status of psychology: An academic controversy in historical context. In BringmannW. G.TweneyR. D. (Eds.), Wundt studies: A centennial collection (pp. 396–421). Toronto, Canada: Hogrefe.
9.
BakanD. (1996). The crisis in psychology. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5(4), 335–342.
10.
BartolucciC.LombardoG. P. (2011). Le origini della scienza psicologica in Italia [The origins of psychological science in Italy]. In DazziN.LombardoG. P. (Eds.), Le origini della psicologia italiana [Origins of Italian psychology] (pp. 13–38). Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
11.
BartolucciC.LombardoG. P. (2012). The origins of psychology in Italy: Themes and authors that emerge through a content analysis of theRivista di Filosofia Scientifica [Journal of Scientific Philosophy]. History of Psychology, 15(3), 247–262.
12.
BühlerK. (1927). Die Krise der Psychologie [The crisis of psychology]. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer.
13.
BüttemeyerW. (1969). Roberto Ardigò e la psicologia moderna [Robert Ardigò and modern psychology]. Florence, Italy: La Nuova Italia.
14.
BüttemeyerW. (2011). I metodi della psicologia secondo Roberto Ardigò [Psychological methods according to Robert Ardigò]. In DazziN.LombardoG. P. (Eds.), Le origini della psicologia italiana [Origins of Italian psychology] (pp. 39–58). Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
15.
CarsonJ. (2012). How psychology “found its true path”? Methods, objectivity, and cries of “crisis” in early twentieth-century French psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biomedical Sciences – Part C, 43(2), 445–454.
16.
CeccarelliG. (Ed.). (2010). La psicologia italiana all’inizio del Novecento: Cento anni dal 1905 [Italian psychology at the beginning of the 1900s: One hundred years after 1905]. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
17.
CiminoG. (1994). Introduzione: Francesco De Sarlo nella storia della psicologia italiana [Introduction: Francesco De Sarlo in the history of Italian psychology]. In AlbertazziL.CiminoG.Gori-SaveliniS. (Eds.), Francesco De Sarlo e il laboratorio fiorentino di psicologia [Francesco De Sarlo and the Florentine laboratory of psychology] (pp. 5–9). Bari, Italy: Laterza.
18.
CiminoG. (1998). Origini e sviluppi della psicologia italiana [Origins and developments in Italian psychology]. In CiminoG.DazziN. (Eds.), La psicologia in Italia. I protagonisti e i problemi scientifici, filosofici e istituzionali (1870–1945) [Psychology in Italy: Actors and scientific, philosophical and institutional problems (1870–1945)] (pp. 11–54). Milan, Italy: Led.
19.
CiminoG.LombardoG. P. (Eds.). (2004). Sante De Sanctis tra psicologia generale e psicologia applicata [Sante De Sanctis between general psychology and applied psychology]. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
20.
ComteA. (1844). Discours sur l’esprit positif [A discourse on the positive spirit]. Paris, France: Carilian Goeury e Vor Dalmont Éditeurs.
21.
CroceB. (1906). La Sociologia e la Psicologia sperimentale nelle Università [Sociology and experimental psychology in universities]. La Critica. Rivista di Letteratura, Storia e Filosofia, 4, 322–325.
22.
CroceB. (1907). Il sofisma della filosofia empirica [The sophism of empirical philosophy]. La Critica. Rivista di Letteratura, Storia e Filosofia, 5, 495–498.
23.
CroceB. (1909). Logica come scienza del concetto puro [Logic as the science of pure concept]. Bari, Italy: Laterza.
24.
DaumasM. (Ed.). (1957). Histoire de la science [The history of science]. Paris, France: Librairie Gallimard.
25.
De LiguoriG. (1988). Materialismo inquieto. Vicende dello scientismo in Italia nell’età del positivismo [Restless materialism: The doings of scientism in Italy in the age of positivism]. Rome-Bari, Italy: Laterza.
26.
De SanctisS. (1897). Il metodo positivo nella scienza [The positivist method of science]. Il pensiero moderno, 1(1), 1–10.
27.
De SanctisS. (Ed.). (1905, April). Atti del V Congresso Internazionale di Psicologia: Tenuto a Roma dal 26 al 30 Aprile 1905 [Acts of the V International Congress of Psychology: Held in Rome 26 to 30 April 1905]. Rome, Italy: Forzani.
28.
De SanctisS. (1912). I metodi della psicologia moderna [The methods of modern psychology]. Rivista di psicologia, 7(1), 10–26.
29.
De SanctisS. (1916). Di alcune tendenze della psicologia contemporanea [Some tendencies of contemporary psychology]. Contributi psicologici del laboratorio di psicologia sperimentale della R. Università di Roma, 3, 1–12.
30.
De SanctisS. (1920). I metodi onirologici [Methods for the study of sleep]. Rivista di psicologia, 16(1), 1–30.
31.
De SanctisS. (1929). I metodi della psicologia generale [The methods of general psychology]. In Psicologia sperimentale: Vol. I. Psicologia generale [Experimental psychology: Vol. 1. General psychology] (pp. 30–69). Rome, Italy: Stock.
De SanctisS. (1930). Metodi e procedimenti della psicologia differenziale [The methods and proceedings of different psychology]. In Psicologia Sperimentale: Vol. II. Psicologia applicata [Experimental psychology: Vol. 2. Applied psychology] (pp. 74–114). Rome, Italy: Stock.
34.
De SarloF. (1903). I dati dell’esperienza psichica [Data from the mental experience]. Florence, Italy: Galletti e Cocci.
35.
De SarloF. (1914). La crisi della psicologia [The crisis of psychology]. Psiche, 3(1), 105–120.
36.
Di TrocchioF.FiasconaroL. (1998). Cesare Colucci. In CiminoG.DazziN. (Eds.), La psicologia in Italia: I protagonisti e i problemi scientifici, filosofici e istituzionali (1870–1945) [Psychology in Italy: The protagonists and scientific, philosophical and institutional problems (1870–1945)] (pp. 297–322). Milan, Italy: Led.
37.
DrieschH. (1925). The crisis in psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
FarberowN. L. (1973). The crisis is chronic. American Psychologist, 28(5), 388–394.
39.
FayeC. (2012). American social psychology: Examining the contours of the 1970s crisis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biomedical Sciences– Part C, 43(2), 514–521.
40.
FerruzziF. (1998). La crisi della Psicologia in Italia [The crisis of psychology in Italy]. In CiminoG.DazziN. (Eds.), La psicologia in Italia: I protagonisti e i problemi scientifici, filosofici e istituzionali (1870–1945) [Psychology in Italy: Actors and scientific, philosophical and institutional problems (1870–1945)] (pp. 651–720). Milan, Italy: Led.
41.
GarinE. (1978). Filosofia e Scienza nel Novecento [Philosophy and science in the 20th century]. Roma-Bari, Italy: Laterza.
42.
GoertzenJ. (2008). On the possibility of unification: The reality and nature of the crisis in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 18, 829–852. doi: 10.1177/0959354308097260
43.
GundlachH. (2012). Bhüler revisisted in times of war – Peter R. Hofstätter’s The Crisis of Psychology (1941). Studies in History and Philosophy of Biomedical Sciences – Part C, 43(2), 504–513.
44.
HofstätterP. R. (1941). Die Krise der Psychologie: Betrachtungen über den Standort einer Wissenschaft in Volksganzen [The crisis of psychology: Observations about the position of a science in the whole of the nation]. Deutschlands Erneuerung, 25, 562–578.
45.
HusserlE. (1954). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie [The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy]. In BiemelW. (Ed.), Husserliana – Edmund Husserl, Gesammelte Werke: Vol. VI [Husserliana – Edmund Husserl, collected works: Vol. VI] (pp. 1–276). Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published 1936)
46.
HymanL. (2012). Vygotsky’s crisis: Argument, context, relevance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biomedical Sciences – Part C, 43(2), 473–482.
47.
KimU. (1999). After the “crisis” in social psychology: The development of the transactional model of science. Asian Journal of Social psychology, 2(1), 1–19.
48.
KostyleffN. (1911). La crise de la psychologie expérimetale [The crisis of experimental psychology]. Paris, France: Alcan.
49.
LombardoG. (2008). Note storiografiche sulla psicologia italiana del primo Novecento: Le vicende accademiche di Sante De Sanctis (1898–1935) [Historiographical notes on early 20th century Italian psychology: The academic doings of Sante De Sanctis (1898–1935)]. Rassegna di Psicologia, 25, 133–154.
50.
LombardoG. P.CicciolaE. (2005). La docenza universitaria di Sante De Sanctis nella storia della psicologia italiana [The university professorship of Sante De Sanctis in the history of Italian psychology]. Teorie & Modelli, 10(3), 5–43.
51.
LombardoG. P.CicciolaE. (2006). The clinical-differential approach of Sante De Sanctis in Italian scientific psychology. Physis, 43(1–2), 443–457.
52.
LombardoG. P.CicciolaE. (2009). Sante De Sanctis e Vittorio Benussi: Rapporti scientifici, istituzionali e personali nella storia della psicologia italiana attraverso una ricerca d’archivio [Sante De Sanctis and Vittorio Benussi: An archival study of scientific, institutional and personal relationships in the history of Italian psychology]. Rassegna di Psicologia, (2), 95–114.
53.
LombardoG. P.FoschiR. (1997). La psicologia italiana e il Novecento: Le prospettive emergenti nella prima metà del secolo [Italian psychology and the 20th century: The emerging perspectives during the first half of the century]. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
54.
LombardoG. P.FoschiR. (2008). Escape from the dark forest: The experimentalist standpoint of the Sante De Sanctis dreaming psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 21, 45–69.
55.
LuccioR. (1978a). Breve storia della psicologia italiana [A brief history of Italian psychology]. Psicologia contemporanea, 5(25), 43–45.
56.
LuccioR. (1978b). Breve storia della psicologia italiana: le origini [A brief history of Italian psychology: The origins]. Psicologia contemporanea, 5(26), 44–46.
57.
LuccioR. (1978c). Breve storia della psicologia italiana: il decollo [A brief history of Italian psychology: The launch]. Psicologia contemporanea, 5(27), 48–53.
58.
LuccioR. (1978d). Breve storia della psicologia italiana: psicologia e fascismo [A brief history of Italian psychology: Psychology and fascism]. Psicologia contemporanea, 5(28), 37–39.
59.
MandlerG. (2011). Crises and problems seen from experimental psychology. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology, 31(4), 240–246.
60.
MarhabaS. (1981). Lineamenti della psicologia italiana, 1870–1945 [Features of Italian psychology, 1870–1945]. Florence, Italy: Giunti.
61.
MucciarelliG. (Ed.). (1982). La Psicologia italiana: Fonti e documenti: le origini (1860–1918) [Italian psychology: Sources and documents: The origins (1860–1918)]. Bologna, Italy: Pitagora.
62.
MucciarelliG. (Ed.). (1984). La Psicologia italiana: Fonti e documenti: la crisi (1918–1945) [Italian psychology: Sources and documents: The crisis (1918–1945)]. Bologna, Italy: Pitagora.
63.
MülbergerA. (2012). Wundt contested: The first crisis declaration in psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences– Part C, 42(2), 434–444.
64.
MülbergerA.SturmT. (Eds). (2012). Psychology, a science in crisis? A century of reflections and debates [Special section]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences – Part C, 43(2), 425–521.
65.
MusattiC. (1926). Analisi del concetto di realtà empirica [Analysis of the concept of empirical reality]. Città di Castello, Italy: Il Solco.
66.
MusattiC. (1938). Gli indirizzi della psicologia contemporanea nei loro fondamenti metodologici [The directions of contemporary psychology from their methodological foundations]. Studi Urbinati, 1(2), 1–41.
67.
MusattiC. (1964). Condizioni dell’esperienza e fondazione della psicologia [Conditions of the experience and foundation of psychology]. Florence, Italy: Editrice Universitaria.
68.
PoggiS. (1991). Introduzione al positivismo [Introduction to positivism]. Rome-Bari, Italy: Laterza.
69.
RosenzweigM. R.HoltzmanM. S.BélangerD. (2000). History of the International Union of Psychological Sciences (IUPsyS). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
70.
Saint-SimonH.de (1807). Introduction aux travaux scientifiques du XIXe siècle. In D’Amato (2005) Introduzione ai lavori scientifici del secolo XIX e altri scritti del periodo napoleonico [Introduction to 19th Century Scientific Works and Other Writings from the Napoleonic Period]. Italy, Florence: L.S. Olschki.
71.
SergiG. (1873). Principi di Psicologia sulla base delle scienze sperimentali [Principles of psychology at the basis of the experimental sciences]. Messina, Italy: Capra.
72.
Siciliani de CumisN. (Ed.). (2005). Filosofia e Università: Da Labriola a Vailati 1882–1902 [Philosophy and the university: From Labriola to Vailati 1882–1902]. Turin, Italy: UTET.
73.
SinatraM. (2000). La psicofisiologia a Torino: A. Mosso e F. Kiesow [Psychophysiology in Turin: A. Mosso and F. Kiesow]. Bari, Italy: Pensa.
74.
StamH. J. (2004). Unifying psychology: Epistemological act or disciplinary maneuver?Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(12), 1259–1262.
75.
SturmT. (2012). Bühler and Popper: Kantian therapies for the crisis in psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences – Part C, 43(2), 462–472.
76.
TeoT. (2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. Toronto, Canada: Springer.
77.
VygotskyL. S. (1997). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation (van der VeerR., Trans.). In RieberR.W.WollockJ. (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vytgosky: Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology (pp. 233–343). New York, NY: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1927)
78.
WillyR. (1897). Die Krisis in der Psychologie [The crisis in psychology]. Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosphie, 21(1), 79–96; 21(2), 227–249; 21(3), 332–353.
