My starting point is a dialogical notion of language that puts forth language activity as a dynamic process performed by subjects conceived as dialogical selves. Obviously, the language performance taking place at a specific moment is not pure momentaneity, not only unique but also well-known, it can be identified and recognized. What, then, grants the performance order and makes it non-arbitrary? To preserve the priority of the performance of language activity one has to conceive of a structuring moment other than some supra-individual system that is upstream to performance. This leads to the “in-between”: the principal assumption is that relata are constituted by an in-between, understood as a medium-generating relatedness, and thus the relata as such. Seeing language as that medium, I look at the way it functions, how it supplies forms as possibilities of generating a communicable and understandable subjectivity. Time is a key notion to this questioning.
AndresenH. (2002). Interaktion, Sprache & Spiel: Zur Funktion des Rollenspiels für die Sprachentwicklung im Vorschulalter [Interaction, language & play: On the function of role play for the development of language in preschool children]. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
2.
AuerP.Couper-KuhlenE. (1994). Rhythmus und Tempo konversationeller Alltagssprache [Rhythm and tempo of everyday conversational language]. LiLi Zeitschrift für Literaturwisseschaft und Linguistik, 96, 78–106.
3.
BakhtinM. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (EmersonC., Ed. & Trans.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1929)
4.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Speech genres and other late essays (EmersonC.HolquistM., Eds., McGeeV. W., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original article published 1953–54)
5.
BertauM.-C. (2010, September/October). Alter, ego, and polis: Witnessed self formations. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on the Dialogical Self, Athens, Greece.
6.
BertauM.-C. (2011a). Anreden, Erwidern, Verstehen: Elemente einer Psycholinguistik der Alterität [Address, reply, understanding: Elements of a psycholinguistics of alterity]. Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
7.
BertauM.-C. (2011b). Language for the other: Constructing cultural-historical psycholinguistics. Tätigkeitstheorie – E-journal for Activity Theoretical Research in Germany, 5, 13–49. Retrieved from http://psyjournals.ru/en/tatigkeitstheorie/2011/n5/52792.shtml
8.
BertauM.-C. (2012). Developmental origins of the dialogical self: Early childhood years. In HermansH. J. M.GieserT. (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 64–81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BertauM.-C. (2013). Voices of others unto the self, voices of others in the self: Polyphony as means and resource for constructing and reconstructing social reality. In LiégeoisA.CorveleynJ.RiemslaghM.BurggraeveR. (Eds.), “After you!” Dialogical ethics and the pastoral counselling process (pp. 37–65). Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.
10.
BertauM.-C. (in press). Inner form as a notion migrating from West to East: Acknowledging the Humboldtian tradition in cultural-historical psychology. In YasnitskyA.van der VeerR.FerrariM. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural-historical theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BertauM.-C.GonçalvesM. M.RaggattP. T. F. (2012a). Dialogic formations: Investigations into the origins and development of the dialogical self. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
12.
BertauM.-C.GonçalvesM. M.RaggattP. T. F. (2012b). Introduction: A psychological paradigm for psychology. In BertauM.-C.GonçalvesM. M.RaggattP. T. F. (Eds.), Dialogic formations: Investigations into the origins of the dialogical self (pp. xi–xx). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
13.
BuchheimT. (1986). Die Sophistik als Avantgade normalen Lebens [The Sophists as avant-garde of normal life]. Hamburg, Germany: Meiner.
14.
CutlerA.KleinW.LevinsonS. C. (2005). The cornerstones of twenty-first century psycholinguistics. In CutlerA. (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornestones (pp. 1–20). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
15.
De JaegherH.Di PaoloE. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenological and Cognitive Science, 6, 485–507.
16.
Di CesareD. (1996). Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767–1835). In BorscheT. (Ed.), Klassiker der Sprachphilosophie: Von Platon bis Noam Chomsky [Classics in the philosophy of language: From Plato to Noam Chomsky] (pp. 275–289). München, Germany: C. H. Beck.
17.
EnglerR. (1968). Lexique de la terminologie saussurienne. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Spectrum Éditeurs.
18.
FogelA.GarveyA.HsuH-C.West-StromingD. (2006). Change processes in relationships: A relational-historical research approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
FriedrichJ. (1993). Der Gehalt der Sprachform: Paradigmen von Bachtin bis Vygotskij [The content of the language form: Paradigms from Bakhtin to Vygotsky]. Berlin, Germany: Akademie Verlag.
20.
FriedrichJ. (2005). Die Apperzeptionsgebundenheit des Sprechens: Ein historischer Exkurs in die Diskussion um die innere Sprache [Speech bound to apperception: A historical digression in the discussion of inner speech]. In BertauM.-C.WeraniA.KegelG. (Eds.), Psycholinguistische Studien 2 [Psycholinguistic studies 2] (pp. 27–59). Aachen, Germany: Shaker.
21.
GadamerH.-G. (1986). Mensch und Sprache [Man and language]. In Wahrheit und Methode, Band 2 [Truth and Method: Vol. 2] (pp. 146–154). Tübingen, Germany: J. C. B. Mohr. (Original work published 1966)
22.
GarveyC. (1977). Play with language and speech. In Ervin-TrippS.Mitchell-KernanC. (Eds.), Child discourse (pp. 27–47). New York, NY: Academic Press.
23.
GergenK. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
GipperH. (1992). Sprachphilosophie in der Romantik [Philosophy of language in romanticism]. In DascalM.GerhardusD.LorenzK.MeggleG. (Eds.), Sprachphilosophie: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung [Philosophy of language: An international handbook of contemporary research] (pp. 197–233). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
25.
GratierM.BertauM.-C. (2012). Polyphony: A vivid source of self and symbol. In BertauM.-C.GonçalvesM. M.RaggattP. T. F. (Eds.), Dialogic formations: Investigations into the origins of the dialogical self (pp. 85–119). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
26.
HermansH. J. M.GieserT. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HumboldtW., von (1903–1936). Gesammelte Schriften (LeitzmannA., Ed.). Berlin, Germany: B. Behr’s Verlag.
28.
HumboldtW., von (1994). Ueber den Dualis [On the dial]. In TrabantJ. (Ed.), Über die Sprache: Reden vor der Akademie [On language: Speeches for the academy] (pp. 143–172). Tübingen, Germany: Francke. (Original work published 1827)
HymesD. (1975). Breakthrough into performance. In Ben-AmosD.GoldsteinK. (Eds.), Folklore: Performance and communication (pp. 11–74). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
31.
JakubinskijL. P. (1979). On verbal dialogue (J. E. Knox & L. Barner, Trans.). dispositio. Revista Hispánica de Semiótica Literaria IV, 11–12, 321–335. (Original work published 1923)
32.
LangackerR. W. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 143–188.
33.
LiebrucksB. (1965). Sprache und Bewußtsein: Band 2. Sprache. Wilhelm von Humboldt [Language and consciousness: Vol. 2. Language. Wilhelm von Humboldt]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
34.
LiebrucksB. (1972). Wilhelm von Humboldt: Die Dreistrahligkeit der semantischen Relation [Wilhem von Humboldt: The threefoldness of the semantic relation]. In HeintelE. (Ed.), Einführung in die Sprachphilosophie [Introduction to the philosophy of language] (pp. 69–84). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
35.
LinellP. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
36.
LinellP. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
37.
LipariL. (2014). Listening, thinking, being: Toward an ethic of attunement. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.
38.
LyraM. C. D. P.BertauM.-C. (2008). Dialogical practices as basis for self. Studia Psychologica, VI(8), 173–193.
39.
MarkovàI.FoppaK. (1990). The dynamics of dialogue. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
40.
SaussureF. de (2002). Écrits de linguistique générale [Writings on general linguistics] (BouquetS.EnglerR., Eds.). Paris, France: Gallimard.
41.
SchürmannV. (2008). Prozess und Tätigkeit: Zur Spezifik der Tätigkeitstheorie [Process and activity: On the specificity of activity theory]. Behindertenpädagogik, 47(1), 21–30.
VološinovV. N. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language (MatejkaL.TitunikR., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1929)
51.
WeigandE. (2009). Language as dialogue. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
52.
YasnitskyA. (2011). Vygotsky circle as a personal network of scholars: Restoring connections between people and ideas. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 422–457.
