The American pragmatist Charles Sanders Peirce described “Thirdness” as the influence of one subject on a second mediated by a third. In psychology the idea of Thirdness has been captured in a wide range of triadic models that draw on Peirce’s original insights about mediation. In this paper, links are developed between Peirce’s triadic approach to semiotics, accounts of the dialogical self as “multi-voiced,” and the role of “mediating objects” as third-term semiotic markers in self-representation. Using case material from a life history, the emergence of conflicting positions in the self is illustrated using dialogical triads. The triads incorporate meaning-charged objects (people, things, events) as third-term mediators. The mediators are distinctive because they have a doubled quality, defining both similarities and differences between opposing positions. I argue that the analytic approach developed here helps to shed light on the tension between multiplicity and integration in theories of the self’s formation.
Amsterdam, B. ( 1972). Mirror self-image reactions before age two. Developmental Psychobiology, 5, 297-305.
2.
Bakhtin, M.M. ( 1981). The dialogic imagination (M. Holquist, Ed.; M. Holquist & C. Emerson, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
Bakhtin, M.M. ( 1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. (C. Emerson, Ed. & Trans.) Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1929)
4.
Bakhtin, M.M. ( 1990). Art and answerability (V. Liapunov, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1920-1924)
5.
Barresi, J. ( 2002). From "the Thought is the Thinker" to the "the Voice is the Speaker": William James and the dialogical self. Theory & Psychology, 12, 237-250.
6.
Bertau, M.-C. ( 2004). Developmental origins of the dialogical self: Some significant moments. In H.J.M. Hermans & G. Dimaggio (Eds.), The dialogical self in psychotherapy (pp. 29-42). London, UK: Brunner-Routledge .
7.
Bradley, B.S. (2010a). Experiencing symbols. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Symbolic transformations: Toward an interdisciplinary science of symbols (pp. 93-119). London , UK: Routledge.
8.
Bradley, B.S. ( 2010b). Jealousy in infant-peer trios: From narcissism to culture . In S.L. Hart & M. Legerstee (Eds.), Handbook of jealousy: Theories, principles and multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 192-234). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
9.
Brewster Smith, M. ( 1994). Selfhood at risk: Postmodern perils and the perils of post-modernism. American Psychologist, 49, 405-411.
10.
Buhler, K. ( 1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. (Original work published 1934)
11.
Chandler, M.J., Lalonde, C.E., & Teucher, U. ( 2003). Culture, continuity and the limits of narrativity. In C. Daiute & C. Lightfoot (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society (pp. 245-265), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Colapietro, V. ( 1989). Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic reflection on subjectivity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
13.
Colapietro, V. ( 2006). Practice, agency, and sociality: An orthogonal reading of classical Pragmatism [Peer commentary on the paper "Pragmatism and the dialogical self" by N. Wiley]. International Journal of Dialogical Science, 1, 23-31.
14.
Erikson, E.H. ( 1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
15.
Favareau, D. ( 2001). Constructing representema: On the neurosemiotics of self and vision. Seed, 2(4), 3-24.
16.
Gergen, K. ( 1994). Exploring the postmodern: Perils or potentials? American Psychologist, 49, 412-416.
17.
Gregg, G.S. ( 1991). Self-representation: Life narrative studies in identity and ideology. New York, NY: Greenwood .
18.
Hermans, H.J.M. ( 2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243-281.
19.
Hermans, H.J.M. & Hermans-Konopka, A. ( 2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Hermans, H.J.M., & Kempen, H.J. ( 1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21.
Hermans, H.J.M., Kempen, H.J., & Van Loon, R.J.P. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 23-33.
22.
James, W. ( 1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). London, UK: MacMillan.
23.
Lacan, J. ( 1977). The mirror-stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In Écrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London, UK: Tavistock. (Original work published 1949 )
24.
Lysaker, J. ( 2006). I am not what I seem to be [Peer commentary on the paper "Pragmatism and the dialogical self" by N. Wiley]. International Journal of Dialogical Science, 1, 41-45.
25.
Marková, I. ( 2003). Dialogicality and social representations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
McAdams, D.P. ( 1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of identity. New York, NY: William Morrow.
27.
Michel. M., Andacht, F., & Gomez, W. ( 2008). The relevance of secondness to the psychological study of the dialogical self. International Journal of Dialogical Science, 3, 301-334.
28.
Neilsen, M., Dissanayake, C., & Kashima, Y. ( 2003). A longitudinal investigation of self-other discrimination and the emergence of mirror self-recognition. Infant Behavior & Development, 26, 213-226.
29.
Neuman, Y. ( 2003). Mirrors mirrored: Is that all there is? Seed, 4(1), 2-7.
30.
Peirce, C.S. ( 1931-1958). The collected papers of C.S. Peirce (Vols. I-VIII; C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Raggatt, P.T.F. ( 2000). Mapping the dialogical self: Towards a rationale and method of assessment. European Journal of Personality, 14, 65-90.
32.
Raggatt, P.T.F. ( 2002). The landscape of narrative and the dialogical self: Exploring identity using the Personality Web Protocol. Narrative Inquiry , 12, 291-320.
33.
Raggatt, P.T.F. ( 2006). Multiplicity and conflict in the dialogical self: A life-narrative approach. In D.P. McAdams, R. Josselson, & A. Lieblich (Eds.), Identity and story: Creating self in narrative (pp. 15-37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
34.
Raggatt, P.T.F. ( 2007). Forms of positioning in the dialogical self: A system of classification and the strange case of Dame Edna Everage. Theory & Psychology, 17, 355-383.
35.
Raggatt, P.T.F. (in press). Personal chronotypes in the dialogical self: A developmental case study. In M.-C. Bertault, M. Goncalves, & P.T.F. Raggatt (Eds.), Dialogical development. Greenwich, CT: Infoage.
36.
Salgado, J. ( 2007). The dialogical self: Affect, agency and otherness. In L.M. Simao & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Otherness in question: Labyrinths of the self (pp. 316-331). Greenwich, CT: Infoage.
37.
Valsiner, J. ( 2003). Dialogues with personal futures: Strategic meaning construction and its functions. In A.U. Branco & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Issues of communication and meta-communication in human development (pp. 12-31). Stamford, CT: Greenwood.
38.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M.Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner , & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Wiley, N. ( 1994). The semiotic self. Chicago, IL: Univerity of Chicago Press.
40.
Wiley, N. ( 2006). Pragmatism and the dialogical self. International Journal of Dialogical Science, 1, 5-21.
41.
Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., & Psaltis, C. ( 2007). The metaphor of the triangle in theories of human development . Human Development, 50, 208-229.
