In their recent article, Williams and Gantt (2013) make the provocative claim that the only way to account for human aspiration is to recognize the existence of an eternal soul. Although it is possible to argue for such a position, their exposition is plagued by unsubstantiated assertions, false dichotomies, straw-person arguments, appeals to authority, and disregard for large psychological literatures related to their claims. These problematic forms of argumentation are inadequate to the task that these authors set for themselves and show insufficient respect for many potential interlocutors. In their apparent eagerness to discuss their eternal soul thesis, Williams and Gantt dismiss the work of scholars in positive psychology, virtue ethics, and “mainstream psychology” with whom they share extensive common ground, thereby neglecting the richness and fruitfulness of these scholars’ contributions to the topic of human aspiration.
Aristotle (1984). The complete works of Aristotle: Vol. 1. (BarnesJ., Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
ArnhartL. (1998). Darwinian natural right: The biological ethics of human nature. Albany: SUNY Press.
3.
CanevelloA.CrockerJ. (2010). Creating good relationships: Responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 78–106.
4.
DamonW. (2008). The path to purpose: Helping our children find their calling in life. New York, NY: Free Press.
5.
DecetyJ.GrèzesJ. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research, 1079, 4–14.
6.
EisenbergN. (2002). Empathy-related emotional responses, altruism, and their socialization. In DavidsonR. J.HarringtonA. (Eds.), Visions of compassion: Western scientists and Tibetan Buddhists examine human nature (pp. 131–164). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
EmmonsR. A. (2003). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
8.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2003). Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: Influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 950–968.
9.
FehrE.GaechterS. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.
10.
FehrB.SprecherS. (2009). Prototype analysis of the concept of compassionate love. Personal Relationships, 16, 343–364.
11.
FowersB. J. (2005). Virtue and psychology: Pursuing excellence in ordinary practices. Washington, DC: APA Press.
12.
FowersB. J. (2010). Instrumentalism and psychology: Beyond using and being used. Theory & Psychology, 20, 1–23.
13.
FowersB. J. (2012). An Aristotelian framework for the human good. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32, 10–23.
14.
GadamerH.-G. (1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
15.
GuignonC. B. (2002). Hermeneutics, authenticity, and the aims of psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 22, 83–102.
16.
HeldB. (2004). The negative side of positive psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 44, 9–46.
17.
HutaV.RyanR. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure versus virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.
18.
LefevorG. T.FowersB. J. (2013, March). Toward a unified moral psychology: An Aristotelian answer to the definitional disagreement. Paper presented at the Mid-Winter Meeting of the Society for Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, Austin, TX.
19.
MacaroA. (2006). Reason, virtue, and psychotherapy. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20.
MacIntyreA. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
21.
ManerJ. K.LuceC. L.NeubergS. L.CialdiniR. B.BrownS.SagarinB. J. (2002). The effects of perspective taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1601–1610.
22.
MaslowA. H. (1993). The farther reaches of human nature. New York, NY: Penguin.
23.
McAdamsD. P. (1985). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
24.
MorowitzH. J. (2004). The emergence of everything: How the world became complex. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
MyersD. G. (2004). Human connections and the good life: Balancing individuality and community in public policy. In LinleyP. A.JosephS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 641–657). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
26.
NiemiecC. P.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2009). The path taken: Consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 291–306.
27.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
OkrentM. (2007). Rational animals: The teleological roots of intentionality. Athens: Ohio University Press.
29.
RichardsonF. C.FowersB. J.GuignonC. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
RyanR. M.HutaV.DeciE. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.
31.
SacksJ. (2003). The dignity of difference: How to avoid the clash of civilizations (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.
32.
WaltonD. (2008). Informal logic: A pragmatic approach (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
WeinsteinN.PrzybylskiA. K.RyanR. M. (2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1315–1329.
34.
WestS. A.GriffinA. S.GardnerA. (2007). Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Current Biology, 17, R661–R672.
35.
WilliamsR. N.GanttE. E. (2013). Psychology and the death of aspiration. Theory & Psychology, 23, 184–204.
