This paper draws on Hannah Arendt’s political thought to question the relationship between theory and practice in psychology and the public role of psychologists. One of Arendt’s main contributions to political theory was to underline the specificity of political action, and to stress that politics should not be ruled by pure theoretical reason or reduced to the technical management of social issues. Applied to psychology, a view of the relationship between theory and practice that ignores this specificity may well lead to efficacious applications, but it has a certain number of politically problematic consequences. These include the a priori disqualification of opinions, a loss of common sense, the a priori definition of the world as a set of variables, and the a priori definition of people as “material” to be shaped rather than as political actors. Such consequences are problematic insofar as they can lead to the exclusion of people from the public realm and undermine the very possibility of genuine political action. These points are illustrated and discussed through examples drawn from psychoanalysis and experimental social psychology.
FariasV. (1989). Heidegger and Nazism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
17.
FoucaultM. (1998). The history of sexuality: Vol 1. The will to knowledge (HurleyR., Trans.). London, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1976)
18.
FoxD.PrilleltenskyI. (1996). The inescapable nature of politics in psychology: A response to O’Donohue and Dyslin. New Ideas in Psychology, 14, 21–26.
19.
GarciaE. (1990). Bilingualism and the academic performance of Mexican-American children: The evolving debate. ERIC Digest. ED321963. ERIC Clearinghouse.
20.
HakutaK. (1986). Mirror of language: The debate on bilingualism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
LamenschM. (1997b, August26). Le Pr van Meerbeeck réagit à la “lettre ouverte” de Jeanine Lauwens et maintient son diagnostic: “Marc Dutroux se pose en victime, comme sa mère” [Prof. van Meerbeeck reacts to the “open letter” by Jeanine Lauwens and maintains his diagnostic: “Marc Dutroux poses as a victim, like his mother”]. Le Soir, 16. Retrieved from http://archives.lesoir.be/le-pr-van-meerbeeck-reagit-a-la-lettre-ouverte-de_t-19970826-Z0E483.html
23.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
MonfortJ.-C.HourdéI. (2005). Outils pour les entretiens d’aide et de soutien psychologique: Tome 1 [Tools for interviews of help and psychological support: Vol. 1]. Paris, France: Heures de France.
25.
MulkayM. (1991). Sociology of science: A sociological pilgrimage. Milton Keyes, UK: Open University Press.
26.
NowotnyH. (2003). Democratizing expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy, 7, 369–383.
27.
O’DonohueW.DyslinC. (1996). Abortion, boxing and Zionism: Politics and the APA. New Ideas in Psychology, 14, 1–10.
28.
PupavacV. (2004). War on the couch: The emotionology of the new international security paradigm. European Journal of Social theory, 7, 149–170.
29.
ReicherS. (1996). The crowd century: Reconciling theoretical failure with practical success. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 535–553.
30.
RicoeurP. (1983). Préface [Preface]. In ArendtH., La condition humaine [The human condition] (pp. 5–32). Paris, France: Calmann-Lévy.
31.
RicoeurP. (1992). Oneself as another (BlameyK. Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1990)
32.
RockmoreT. (1992). On Heidegger’s Nazism and philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
RoseN. (1999). Governing the soul (2nd ed.). London, UK: Free Association Books.
34.
SpearsR.SmithH.J. (2001). Experiments as politics. Political Psychology, 22, 309–330.
35.
StengersI. (2001). The invention of modern sciences (SmithD.W. Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1993)
36.
StengersI.RaletO. (1997). Drugs: Ethical choice or moral consensus? In StengersI., Power and invention: Situating science (BainsP., Trans.; pp. 214–231). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
TaminiauxJ. (1997). The Thracian maid and the professional thinker: Arendt and Heidegger (GendreM. Trans.). Albany: SUNY Press. (Original work published 1992)
TurnerJ. C. (1981). Some considerations in generalizing experimental social psychology. In StephensonG. M.DavisJ.M. (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–34). London, UK: Wiley.
40.
VillaD. (1996). Arendt and Heidegger: The fate of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
