Evolutionary psychology defines the human mind as comprising innate and domain-specific information-processing mechanisms that were designed to solve specific evolutionary problems of our Pleistocene past. Yet it is argued here that evolutionary psychology’s assumptions regarding the mind are often inconsistent with the neurobiological evidence; biological constraints may place limits on the kinds of hypotheses that can be made within a theoretical framework that wants to remain true to the known properties and functions of the human nervous system. Evolutionary psychology’s assumptions regarding our innate biology also shape their treatment of culture and learning in ways that may inaccurately reflect true experience–neurodevelopmental interactions. It is suggested that the mind can be adequately understood and its activities properly explained without hypothetical appeal to countless genetically pre-specified psychological programs, and in a way that remains consistent with both our neurobiology and neo-Darwinian evolution.
AdolphsR.TrandelD.HammannS.YoungW. W.CalderA. J.PhelpsE. A.. . . DamasioA. R. (1999). Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia, 37(10), 1111–1117. doi: 10.1016/S0028–3932(99)00039–1
2.
AllisonT.PuceA.SpencerD. D.McCarthyG. (1999). Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cerebral Cortex, 9(5), 415–430. doi: 10.1093/cercor/9.5.415
3.
BechtelW.MundaleJ. (1996). Integrating neuroscience, psychology, and evolutionary biology through a teleological conception of function. Minds and Machines, 6(4), 481–505.
4.
BegleyS.InterlandiJ. (2009). Don’t blame the caveman. Newsweek, 153(26), 52–62.
5.
BehmeC.DeaconS. H. (2008). Language learning in infancy: Does the empirical evidence support a domain specific language acquisition device?Philosophical Psychology, 21(5), 641–671. doi: 10.1080/09515080802412321
6.
BratticoP. (2008). Shallow reductionism and the problem of complexity in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 18, 483–504. doi: 10.1177/0959354308091840
7.
BrauerJ.AnwanderA.FriedericiA. (2011). Neuroanatomical prerequisites for language functions in the maturing brain. Cerebral Cortex, 21(2), 459–466. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq108
8.
BremnerJ. D.CharneyD. S. (2010). Neural circuits in fear and anxiety. In SteinD. J.HollanderE.RothbaumB. (Eds.), Textbook of anxiety disorders (2nd ed., pp. 55–71). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
9.
BullerD. J. (2005). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
BussD. M. (2005). Introduction: The emergence of evolutionary psychology. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. xxiii–xxv). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
11.
CarruthersP. (2003). Moderately massive modularity. In O’HearA. (Ed.), Minds and persons (pp. 67–90). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
ConferJ. C.EastonJ. A.FleischmanC. G.LewisD. G.PerillouxC.BussD. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65(2), 110–126.
13.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In BarkowJ.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
DeaconR. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. New York, NY: Norton.
16.
DerksenM. (2007). Cultivating human nature. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 189–206. doi: 10.1016.j.newideapsych.2006.09.001
17.
DerksenM. (2010). Realism, relativism, and evolutionary psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20, 467–487. doi: 10.1177/0959354309350245
18.
DuchaineB.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2001). Evolutionary psychology and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 225–230.
19.
EastwickP. W. (2009). Beyond the Pleistocene: Using phylogeny and constraint to inform the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 794–821. doi:10.1037/a0016845
20.
EdelmanG. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire. New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
EhrlichP. (2000). Human natures: Genes, cultures, and the human prospect. New York, NY: Penguin.
22.
EhrlichP. (2003). Genes and cultures: What creates our behavioural phenome?Current Anthropology, 44(1), 87–107.
23.
EhrlichP.EhrlichA. (2009). The dominant animal: Human evolution and the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24.
EtardO.MelletE.PapathanassiouD.BenaliK.HoudeO.MazoyerB.Tzourio-MazoyerN. (2000). Picture naming without Broca’s and Wernicke’s area. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11(3), 617–622. doi: 10.1097/00001756–200002280–00036
25.
FodorJ. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
FodorJ. (2001). The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
FoxE.GriggsL.MouchlianitisE. (2007). The detection of fear-relevant stimuli: Are guns noticed as quickly as snakes?Emotion, 7(4), 691–696. doi: 10.1037/1528–3542.7.4.691
28.
FranksB. (2005). The role of “the environment” in cognitive and evolutionary psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 18(1), 59–82. doi: 10.1080/09515080500085387
29.
GardM.BradleyB. S. (2000). Getting away with rape: Erasure of the psyche in evolutionary psychology. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 2(3), 313–319. doi:10.1080/14616660010024616
30.
GergenK. (2010). The accultured brain. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 795–816. doi: 10.1177/0959354310370906
31.
GobelE.ParrishT.ReberP. (2011). Neural correlates of skill acquisition: Decreased cortical activity during serial inception sequence learning task. Neuroimage, 58(4), 1150–1157. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.090
32.
GoldbergE. (2001). The executive brain: Frontal lobes and the civilized mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
HagenE. (2005). Controversies surrounding evolutionary psychology. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 145–173). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
34.
HelmichI.LatiniA.SigwaltA.CartaM.MachadoS.VelasquesB.. . . BuddeH. (2010). Neurobiological alterations induced by exercise and their impact on depressive disorders. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 6, 115–125. doi: 10.2174/1745017901006010115
35.
InghamJ. M.SpainD. H. (2005). Sensual attachment and incest avoidance in human evolution and child development. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.), 11(4), 677–701. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9655.2005.00257.x
Karmiloff-SmithA. (2010). Multiple trajectories to human language acquisition: Domain-specific or domain-general?Human Neurodevelopment, 53, 239–244. doi: 10.1159/000321280
38.
KilgardM. P. (2002). How sensory experience shapes cortical representations. In SquireL. R.SchacterD. L. (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (3rd ed., pp. 412–424). New York, NY: Guilford.
39.
KolbB.WishawI. Q. (2003). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (5th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
40.
KoziolL. F.BuddingD. E. (2009). Subcortical structures and cognition. New York, NY: Springer.
41.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
LeiberJ. (2008). The wiles of evolutionary psychology and the indeterminancy of selection. Philosophical Forum, 39(1), 53–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9191.2007.00281.x
43.
LindenD. J. (2006). How psychotherapy changes the brain—the contribution of functional neuroimaging. Molecular Psychiatry, 11(6), 528–538. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001816
44.
LippO.DerakshanN.WatersA.LogiesS. (2004). Snakes and cats in the flower bed: Fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals. Emotion, 4(3), 233–250. doi: 10.1037/1528–3542.4.3.233
45.
LugowskaD. (2008). Evolutionary psychology as the contemporary myth. Forum Philosophicum, 13, 357–365.
46.
MalikK. (2002). Man, beast, and zombie: What science can and cannot tell us about human nature. London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
47.
MarcusG. (2003). The birth of the mind: How a tiny number of genes creates the complexity of human thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
48.
OhmanA.MinekaS. (2003). The malicious serpent: Snakes as a prototypical stimulus for an evolved module of fear. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 5–9. doi: 10.1111/1467–8721.01211
49.
PankseppJ. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50.
PankseppJ.PankseppJ. (2000). The seven sins of evolutionary psychology. Evolution and Cognition, 6(2), 108–131.
51.
PinkerS. (1997). How the mind works. New York, NY: Norton.
52.
PurkisH.LippO. (2007). Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: Preferential attention without implicit valence. Emotion, 7(2), 314–323. doi: 10.1037/15283542.7.2.314
53.
RichardsonR. (2007). Evolutionary psychology as maladapted psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54.
RohlfsP.RamirezJ. M. (2006). Aggression and brain asymmetries: A theoretical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(13), 283–297. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2005.09.001
55.
RoseS. (2005). The future of the brain: The promise and perils of tomorrow’s neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
SchlaggarB. L.McCandlissB. D. (2007). Development of neural systems for reading. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 475–503. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135645
58.
SchoreA. N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59.
ShalomD. B. (2008). Functional anatomic models of language: Assembling the pieces. Neuropsychology & Neurology, 14(1), 119–127. doi: 10.1177/1073858407305726
60.
SiegelD. J. (1999). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York, NY: Guilford.
61.
SiglingH. O.Wolterink-DonselaarI. G.SpruijtB. M. (2009). Home seeking behavior in rat pups: Attachment vs. kin selection, oxytocin vs. vasopressin. European Journal of Pharmacology, 612, 48–53.
62.
SorokowskiP. (2008). Attractiveness of blonde women in evolutionary perspective: Studies with two Polish samples. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(3), 737–744. doi:10.2466/PMS.106.3.737–744
63.
TallisR. (2011). Aping mankind: Neuromania, darwinitis, and the misrepresentation of humanity. Durham, UK: Acumen.
64.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In BarkowJ.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In BussD. (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 5–67). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
66.
ToobyJ.CosmidesL.BarrettH. C. (2005). Resolving the debate on innate ideas: Learnability constraints and the evolved interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions. In CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind: Structure and contents (pp. 305–337). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
67.
van DijkJ.KerkhofsR.van RooijI.HaselagerP. (2008). Can there be such a thing as embodied embedded cognitive neuroscience?Theory & Psychology, 18, 297–316. doi:10.1177/0959354308089787
68.
WardT.SiegertR. (2002). Rape and evolutionary psychology: A critique of Thornhill and Palmer’s theory. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 7(2), 145.
