Two minutes of silence: Social technologies of public commemoration

Abstract

A diverse range of commemorative practices developed in the wake of the First World War as collective means for performing private trauma and loss. Public commemorative silence became adopted as a key feature of Armistice Day from 1919 onwards. This practice can be treated as a “social technology,” which is here defined as the mediational means for the reflexive self-modification of the subjective state of affairs of human subjects. Social technologies produce novel experiences, new modalities for performing the psychological. When a social remembering approach to memory is adopted, the Armistice silence can be compared to more recent uses of public silence with respect to how the past is mobilized in the present. In current, highly technologically mediated versions, public silence effectively disposes of those it is supposed to commemorate and makes of silence a spectacle where participants are absorbed in their own enactment of empathy and sorrow. When disconnected from other forms of remembrance, public silence tends not to open the past up for interpretation and debate and should therefore be reconsidered as a means of “one-off” commemoration.

Keywords

commemorative silence Foucault social remembering social technology spirit photography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barthes

(1993). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography ( Howard

, Trans.). London, UK: Vintage.

Bartlett

F.C.

(1932). Remembering: A study in experimental social psychology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Beloff

(1985). Camera culture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Bijker

(1997). Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Towards a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Braverman

(1999). Labour and monopoly capitalism: The degradation of work in the twentieth century (2nd ed.). London, UK: Monthly Review Press.

Brown

S.D.

Hoskins

(2010). Terrorism in the new memory ecology: Mediating and remembering the 2005 London Bombings. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 2, 87–107.

Brown

S. D.

Stenner

(2009). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. London, UK: Sage.

Connerton

(1989). How societies remember. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Deleuze

Guattari

(1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia ( Massumi

, Trans). London, UK: Athlone Press.

10.

Derksen

Vikkelsø

Beaulieu

(2012). Social technologies: Cross-disciplinary reflections on technologies in and from the social sciences. Theory & Psychology, 22, 139–147.

11.

Draaisma

(2000). Metaphors of memory: A history of ideas about the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Foucault

(2000). Technologies of the self. In Rabinow

(Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984: Vol. 1. Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 223–251). London, UK: Penguin.

13.

Gregory

(1994). The silence of memory: Armistice Day 1919–1946. Oxford, UK: Berg.

14.

Hacking

(1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

15.

Halbwachs

(1980). The collective memory ( Didder

F.J.

Jr. Yazdi Ditter

, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1950)

16.

Heidegger

(1977). The question concerning technology. In Lovitt

(Trans.), The question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 319–338). New York, NY: Harper and Row.

17.

Huyssen

(2003). Present pasts: Urban palimpsests and the politics of memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

18.

Imperial War Museum Collections. (n.d.). The two minute silence. Retrieved from http://collections.iwm.org.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.3165

19.

Jolly

(2006). Faces of the living dead: The belief in spirit photography. London, UK: The British Library.

20.

Jones

(1989). Conan Doyle and the spirits: The spiritualist career of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Wellingborough, UK: Aquarian Press.

21.

Latour

(1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

22.

Latour

(2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

23.

Mauss

(2001). The gift: Form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (2nd ed.; Halls

W.D.

, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1923)

24.

McSmith

(2008, February 9). A brief history of silence: When no noise is good noise. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/a-brief-history-of-silence-when-no-noise-is-good-noise-780200.html

25.

Middleton

Brown

S.D.

(2005). The social psychology of experience: Studies in remembering and forgetting. London, UK: Sage.

26.

Middleton

Edwards

(1990). Collective remembering. London, UK: Sage.

27.

O’Leary

(2002). Foucault and the art of ethics. London, UK: Continuum.

28.

Sacks

(1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

29.

The silence in Manchester. (2009, 12 November). The Guardian, 36. (Original work published 12 November 1919)

30.

Wertsch

J. V.

(2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Winner

(1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109, 121–136.

32.

Winter

(1999). Sites of memory, sites of mourning: The Great War in European cultural history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Woolgar

Cooper

(1999). Do artefacts have ambivalence? Moses’s bridges, Winner’s bridges, and other urban legends in S & TS. Social Studies of Science, 29, 433–449.

34.

Young

J.E.

(2000). At memory’s edge: After-images of the Holocaust in contemporary art and architecture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.