This paper engages the notion of parallax: the moment of irreconcilable difference, the gap, the tension, in the presentation of things seen from different perspectives. In this case the particular “thing seen” from different perspectives is something like a subject position in which women’s desire is inscribed as sado-masochistic—both in popular accounts of intimate violence and in more academic accounts of feminist textual resistances within the discourse of victimization. In the process, two stories involving encounters with sado-masochism and feminist desire dialogue with other texts to create problematics within the irreconcilable subject positions they produce when a feminist woman narrates.
Aldridge, A., & Coombes, L. ( 2005). "It’s really quite a delicate issue"-GPs talk about domestic violence. Women’s Studies Journal, 19(2), 56-78.
2.
Braidotti, R. ( 1989). The politics of ontological difference. In T. Brennan (Ed.), Between feminism and psychoanalysis (pp. 89-105). London, UK: Routledge.
3.
Braidotti, R. ( 1991). Patterns of dissonance. Cambridge , UK: Polity.
4.
Busch, R., & Morgan, M. ( 2006). A formative evaluation of the Manawatu Abuse Intervention Network (MAIN): Final report. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.
5.
Butler, J. ( 1997). Excitable speech. A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
Butler, J. ( 1999). Revisiting bodies and pleasures. Theory, Culture & Society, 16, 11-20.
7.
Butler, J. ( 2005). Giving an account of oneself. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
8.
Cheah, P., & Grosz, E. ( 1998). The future of sexual difference: An interview with Judith Butler and Drucilla Cornell. Diacritics, 28(1),19-42.
9.
Cixous, H. ( 1976). The laugh of the Medusa. Signs, 1(4),875-893.
10.
Cixous, H. ( 1988). Sorties [Out and out: Attacks/ways out/forays]. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 287-293). London, UK: Longman . (Original work published 1975)
11.
Coombes, L., Morgan, M., McGray, S., & TeHiwi, E. (2008). Responding together: An integrated report evaluating the aims of the Waitakere Family Violence Court Protocols. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.
12.
Davis, W. ( 2004). Gender bias, fathers’ rights, domestic violence and the family court. Butterworths Family Law Journal, 4, 299-312.
13.
deLauretis, T. ( 1984). Alice doesn’t: Feminism, semiotics, cinema. London, UK: Macmillan.
14.
deLauretis, T. ( 1989). The essence of the triangle. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 1, 3-37.
15.
Doogue, J. ( 2004). The Domestic Violence Act 1995 and s 16B of the Guardianship Act 1968 - The effect on children’s relationships with their non-custodial parent. Butterworths Family Law Journal, 4, 243-248.
16.
Grosz, E. ( 1989). Sexual subversions. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
17.
Hindle, S., & Morgan, M. ( 2006). On being a refuge worker: Psycho-social impacts of advocacy . Women’s Studies Journal, 20(1), 32-47.
18.
Irigaray, L. ( 1977). Woman’s exile. Ideology and Consciousness , 1, 73-89.
19.
Irigaray, L. ( 1985a). This sex which is not one (C. Porter, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
Irigaray, L. ( 1985b). Speculum of the other woman (G. Gill, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
Irigaray, L. ( 2002). Between east and west: From singularity to community . New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
22.
Jardine, A. ( 1985). Gynesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
Kleinman, S. ( 2002). Why sexist language matters. Qualitative Sociology, 25(2), 299-304.
24.
Kostič, M. ( 2006). Feminist theory and practice in the poetry of Adrienne Rich. Facta Universitatis. Linguistics and Literature,4(1),71-84.
25.
Lyons, L.E., & Franklin, C. ( 2004). On the cusp of the personal and the impersonal: An interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Biography, 27, 203-222.
26.
Madson, L., & Shoda, J. ( 2006). Alternating between masculine and feminine pronouns: Does essay topic affect readers’ perceptions? Sex Roles , 54(3/4), 275-285.
27.
Morgan, M. ( 1991, September). Difficult disciplinary positions. Paper presented at Friday night cultural seminars, Fremantle, Australia.
28.
Morgan, M., Coombes, L., & McGray, S. (2007). An evaluation of the Waitakere family violence court protocols: Preliminary report. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.
29.
Morris, M. ( 1988).The pirate’s fiancée: Feminism, reading, postmodernism. London, UK: Verso .
30.
O’Neill, D., & Morgan, M. ( 2001). Pragmatic post-structuralism (I): Participant observation and discourse in evaluating violence intervention. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,11, 263-275.
31.
Parker, I. ( 2004). Slavoj Žižek: A critical introduction. London, UK: Pluto.
32.
Perpich, D. ( 2003). Subjectivity and sexual difference: New figures of the feminine in Irigaray and Cavarero. Continental Philosophy Review, 36, 391-413.
33.
Pond, R., & Morgan, M. ( 2005). Women’s experiences of using lawyers for domestic violence in New Zealand: Criticisms and commendations. Women’s Studies Journal, 19(2), 79-106.
34.
Pond, R., & Morgan, M. ( 2008). Protection, manipulation, or interference? Discourse analysis of New Zealand lawyers’ talk about supervised access and partner violence. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology , 18(5), 282-298.
35.
Schor, N. ( 1989). This essentialism which is not one: Coming to grips with Irigaray. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies , 1, 38-57.
36.
Spivak, G.C. ( 1989). In a word. Interview. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 1,124-156.
37.
Spivak, G.C. ( 1998). Cultural talks in the hot peace: Revisiting the "global village." In P. Cheah & B. Robbins (Eds.), Cosmopolitics: Thinking and feeling beyond the nation (pp. 329-348). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
Stone, A. ( 2003). The sex of nature: A re-interpretation of Irigaray’s metaphysics and political thought. Hypatia, 18(3), 60-86.
39.
Swim, J.K., Mallett, R., & Stangor, C. ( 2004). Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 51(3/4), 117-128.
40.
Žižek, S. ( 2001). The one measure of true love is: You can insult the other . Retrieved from http://www.lacan.com/zizek-measure.htm
41.
Žižek, S. ( 2006). Jacques Lacan’s four discourses. Retrieved from http://www.lacan.com/zizfour.htm
