Doubt is raised that revolutions in measurement theory, for example conjoint measurement or Rasch measurement, will lead to the quantification of psychological attributes. First, the meaning of measurement is explained. Relying on this, it is demonstrated that in order to attain quantification under causally complex circumstances it is necessary to manipulate the phenomena involved and control systematic disturbances. The construction of experimental apparatus is necessary to accomplish these tasks. The creation of modern quantitative science through the adoption of this method is called the Galilean revolution. Next the Millean quantity objection is formulated. If the Galilean revolution is not possible in psychology, the task of quantification is not solvable. The objection is defended. Psychological phenomena are neither manipulable nor controllable to the required extent. Therefore they are not measurable.
Ackermann, R. ( 1989). The new experimentalism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40, 185-190.
2.
Andrich, D. ( 1988). Rasch models for measurement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Andrich, D. ( 2004). Controversy and the Rasch model. Medical Care, 42(1 Suppl. 1), 7-16.
4.
Atwood, G. ( 1784). A treatise on the rectilinear motion and rotation of bodies; with a description of original experiments relative to the subject . Cambridge, UK: Archdeacon.
5.
Barrett, P. ( 2008). The consequence of sustaining a pathology: Scientific stagnation. A commentary on the target article ‘Is psychometrics a pathological science?’ by Joel Michell. Measurement, 6, 78-123.
6.
Berka, K. ( 1983). Measurement: Its concepts, theories and problems. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
7.
Blais, M.A. ( 2003). Have you heard we’re having a revolution? The coming of modern test theory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 208-210.
8.
Blinkhorn, S.F. ( 1997). Past imperfect, future conditional: Fifty years of test theory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 50, 175-185.
9.
Block, H.D., & Marschak, J. ( 1960). Random orderings and stochastic theories of responses . In I. Olkin, S. Ghurye, H. Hoeffding, W. Madow, & H. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 97-132). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Bordeau, S.P. ( 1982). Volts to Hertz: The rise of electricity. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.
11.
Boumans, M. ( 2005). Measurement outside the laboratory. Philosophy of Science, 72, 850-863.
12.
Bradley, R.A., & Terry, M.E. ( 1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324-345.
13.
Brown, J.F. ( 1934). A methodological consideration of the problem of psychometrics . Erkenntnis, 4, 46-61.
14.
Butts, R.E., & Brown, J.R. (Eds.). (1989). Constructivism and science . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer .
15.
Cabeza, R., & Kingstone, A. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Campbell, N. ( 1920). Physics: The elements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Campbell, N. ( 1928). An account of the principles of measurement and calculation . London: Longmans.
18.
Cartwright, N. ( 1999). The dappled world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Cliff, N. ( 1992). Abstract measurement theory and the revolution that never happened. Psychological Science, 3, 186-190.
Crick, F.H.C. ( 1979). Thinking about the brain. Scientific American, 241(3), 219-232.
22.
Dingler, H. ( 1921). Physik und Hypothese [Physics and hypothesis]. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
23.
Dingler, H. ( 1928). Das Experiment [The experiment]. Munich, Germany: Reinhardt.
24.
Dingler, H. ( 1932). Der Glaube an die Weltmaschine und seine Überwindung [Overcoming the belief in the world-machine]. Stuttgart , Germany: Enke.
25.
Ellis, B. ( 1966). Basic concepts of measurement. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Falmagne, J.-C. ( 1976). Random conjoint measurement and loudness summation. Psychological Review, 83, 65-79.
27.
Falmagne, J.-C. ( 1978). A representation theorem for finite random scale systems . Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18, 52-72.
28.
Fechner, G.T. ( 1860). Elemente der Psychophysik [Elements of psychophysics] (Vol. 1). Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf & Härtel.
29.
Finger, S. ( 1994). Origins of neuroscience. New York : Oxford University Press.
30.
Fischer, G.H. ( 1968). Neue Entwicklungen in der psychologischen Testtheorie [New developments in psychological test theory]. In G.H. Fischer (Ed.), Psychologische Testtheorie [Psychological test theory] (pp. 15-158). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
31.
Fischer, G.H. ( 1974). Einführung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests [Introduction to the theory of psychological tests]. Bern , Switzerland: Huber.
32.
Fishburn, P.C. ( 1973). Binary choice probabilities: On the varieties of stochastic transitivity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 10, 327-352.
33.
Franklin, A. ( 1984). The epistemology of experiment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35, 381-390.
34.
Franklin, A. ( 1986). The neglect of experiment. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Franklin, A. ( 1990). Experiment, right or wrong. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Fuillet, L., Dufour, H., & Pelletier, G. ( 2007). Brain of a white-collar worker. The Lancet , 370(9583), 262.
37.
Galilei, G. ( 1991). Dialogues concerning two new sciences. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. (Original work published 1638)
38.
Galison, P. ( 1987). How experiments end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Gooding, D., Pinch, T. , & Schaffer, S. (Eds.). (1989). The uses of experiment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Goodwin, C.J. ( 1995). Research in psychology: Methods and design. New York: Wiley.
41.
Guild, J. ( 1938). Are sensation intensities measurable?British Association for the Advancement of Science, 108, 296-328.
42.
Hacking, I. ( 1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Hanson, N.R. ( 1965). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Heidelberger, M., & Steinle, F. (Eds.). (1998). Experimental essays . Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
45.
Helmholtz, H. von. ( 1998). Zählen und Messen, erkenntnistheoretisch betrachtet [Numbering and measuring from an epistemological viewpoint]. In E. Bonk (Ed.), Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie [Epistemological writings] (pp. 99-129). Vienna: Springer. (Original work published 1887)
46.
Hölder, O. ( 1901). Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass [The axioms of quantity and the theory of measurement]. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-Physische Classe, 53, 1-64.
47.
Hölder, O. ( 1924). Die mathematische Methode [The mathematical method]. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
48.
Janich, P. ( 1978). Physics, natural science or technology. In W. Krohn, E.T. Layton , & P. Weingart (Eds.), The dynamics of science and technology (pp. 3-27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
49.
Janich, P. ( 1985). Protophysics of time. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
50.
Janich, P. ( 1997). Das Maß der Dinge [The measure of things]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
51.
Johnson, H.M. ( 1936). Pseudo-mathematics in the mental and social sciences . American Journal of Psychology, 48, 342-351.
52.
Johnson, H.M. ( 1945). Are psychophysical problems genuine or spurious? American Journal of Psychology, 58, 189-211.
53.
Johnson, H.M. ( 1954). On verifying hypotheses by verifying their implicates . American Journal of Psychology, 67, 723-727.
54.
Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., & Jessell, T.M. (Eds.). (2006). Principles of neural science (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
55.
Karabatsos, G. ( 2001). The Rasch model, additive conjoint measurement, and new models of probabilistic measurement theory. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2, 389-423.
56.
Karabatsos, G. ( 2005). The exchangeable multinomial model as an approach to testing deterministic axioms of choice and measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49, 51-69.
57.
Karabatsos, G. ( 2006). Bayesian nonparametric model selection and model testing . Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 123-148.
58.
Kertesz, A. (Ed.). (1994). Localization and neuroimaging in neuropsychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
59.
Koertge, N. ( 1977). Galileo and the problem of accidents. Journal of the History of Ideas, 38, 389-408.
60.
Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. ( 1971). Foundations of measurement Vol. 1. Additive and polynomial representations. New York: Academic Press.
61.
Krech, D. ( 1950). Dynamic systems, psychological fields, and hypothetical constructs. Psychological Review, 57, 283-290.
62.
Kroes, P. ( 2003). Physics, experiments, and the concept of nature. In H. Radder (Ed.), The philosophy of scientific experimentation (pp. 68-86). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
63.
Lewin, K. ( 1931). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 5, 141-177.
Lorenzen, P. ( 1987). Constructive philosophy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
66.
Luce, R.D. ( 1956). Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24, 178-191.
67.
Luce, R.D., Krantz, D.H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. ( 1990). Foundations of measurement Vol. 3. Representations, axiomatization, and invariance. New York: Academic Press.
68.
Luce, R.D., & Suppes, P. ( 2002). Representational measurement theory. In H. Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 1-41). New York: Wiley.
69.
Luce, R.D., & Tukey, J.W. ( 1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1-27.
70.
Maxwell, J.C. ( 1965). General considerations concerning scientific apparatus . In W.D. Niven (Ed.), The scientific papers of James Clerk Maxwell (Vol. 2, pp. 505-522). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
71.
McMullin, E. ( 1985). Galilean idealization. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 16, 247-273.
72.
Mesulam, M.-M. (Ed.). (2000). Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73.
Michell, J. ( 1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74.
Michell, J. ( 1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355-383.
75.
Michell, J. ( 1999). Measurement in psychology. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
Michell, J. ( 2000). Normal science, pathological science and psychometrics . Theory & Psychology, 10, 639-667.
77.
Michell, J. ( 2004). Item response models, pathological science and the shape of error: Reply to Borsboom and Mellenbergh. Theory & Psychology, 14, 121-129.
78.
Mill, J.S. ( 1974). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1843)
79.
Mittelstrass, J. ( 1970). Neuzeit und Aufklärung [Modern times and enlightenment] . Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter .
80.
Mittelstrass, J. ( 1972). The Galilean revolution. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 2, 297-328.
81.
Narens, L. (1985). Abstract measurement theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Narens, L., & Luce, R.D. (1986). Measurement: The theory of numerical assignments. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 166-180.
82.
Newton, I. ( 1999). Mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1687)
83.
Nicolelis, M.A.L., & Ribeiro, S. ( 2006). Seeking the neural code. Scientific American , 295(6), 70-77.
84.
Nunnally, J.C. ( 1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
85.
Ohm, G.S. ( 1826). Bestimmung des Gesetzes, nach welchem Metalle die Contaktelektricität leiten, nebst einem Entwurfe zu einer Theorie des voltaischen Apparats und des Schweiggerschen Multiplicators [Determination of the law in accordance with which metals conduct contact electricity, together with an outline of a theory of the voltaic apparatus and of Schweigger’s multiplier]. Journal für Chemie und Physik, 46, 137-166.
86.
Parthey, H., & Wahl, D. ( 1966). Die experimentelle Methode in Natur- und Gesellschaftswissenschaften [The experimental method in the natural and social sciences]. Berlin, Germany: VEB.
87.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Pedhazur-Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
88.
Pfanzagl, J. ( 1968). Theory of measurement. Würzburg , Germany: Physica-Verlag.
89.
Posner, M.I., Petersen, S.E., Fox, P.T., & Raichle, M.E. ( 1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain . Science, 240, 1627-1631.
90.
Radder, H. (Ed.). (2003). The philosophy of scientific experimentation. Pittsburgh, PA : University of Pittsburgh Press.
91.
Raichle, M.E. ( 1993, June 17). The scratchpad of the mind. Nature, 363, 583-584.
92.
Rasch, G. ( 1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nielsen & Lydiche. (Original work published 1960)
93.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. ( 1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schönemann, P. ( 1994). Measurement: The reasonable ineffectiveness of mathematics in the social sciences. In I. Borg & P. Mohler (Eds.), Trends and perspectives in empirical social research (pp. 149-160). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
97.
Scott, D., & Suppes, P. ( 1958). Foundational aspects of theories of measurement. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23, 113-128.
98.
Sixtl, F. ( 1982). Messmethoden der Psychologie: Theoretische Grundlagen und Probleme [Measurement methods in psychology: Theoretical foundations and problems] (2nd ed.). Weinheim , Germany: Beltz.
99.
Sixtl, F. ( 1985). Notwendigkeit und Möglichkeit einer neuen Methodenlehre der Psychologie [The necessity and possibility of a new methodology in psychology] . Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie , 32, 320-339.
100.
Sixtl, F. ( 1998). Der Abschied von Homme Moyen alias Average Person [Taking leave of the average person]. In W. Hacker & M. Rinck (Eds.), Bericht über den 41. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Dresden 1998 [Report on the 41st Congress of the German Psychological Association in Dresden, 1998] (pp. 519-526). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science.
101.
Stevens, S.S. ( 1951). Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In S.S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1-49). New York: Wiley.
102.
Suppes, P., Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., & Tversky, A. ( 1989). Foundations of measurement: Vol. 2. Geometrical, threshold, and probabilistic representations . New York: Academic Press.
103.
Suppes, P., & Zinnes, J.L. ( 1963). Basic measurement theory. In R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, & E.H. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3-76). New York: Wiley.
104.
Tarski, A. ( 1954). Contributions to the theory of modelsI. Indagationes Mathematicae, 16, 572-588.
105.
Taylor, J.R. ( 1997). An introduction to error analysis (2nd ed.). Sausalito, CA: University Science Books.
106.
Teichmann, J. ( 1977). Zur Entdeckungsgeschichte des ohmschen Gesetzes, 1775-1826 [On the history of the discovery of Ohm’s law, 1775-1826]. Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift, 98, 96-99.
107.
Tetens, H. ( 1987). Experimentelle Erfahrung [Experimental experience]. Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner Verlag.
108.
Thurstone, L.L. ( 1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
109.
Thurstone, L.L. ( 1959). The measurement of values. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
110.
Trendler, G. ( 2006). Hugo Dingler und das Massproblem in der Psychologie [Hugo Dingler and the measurement problem in psychology]. In P. Janich (Ed.), Wissenschaft und Leben [Science and life] (pp. 123-135). Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.
111.
Wigner, E. ( 1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 13, 1-14.
112.
Wright, B.D. ( 1997). A history of social science measurement. Educational Measurement, 52, 33-45.
113.
Wright, B.D., & Linacre, J.M. ( 1989). Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 70, 857-867.
