In his recent book The Mind Doesn't Work That Way, Fodor argues that computational modeling of global cognitive processes, such as abductive everyday reasoning, has not been successful. In this article the problem is analyzed in the framework of algorithmic information theory. It is argued that the failed approaches are characterized by shallow reductionism, which is rejected in favor of deep reductionism and nonreductionism.
Almeida, J.S., Carrico, J.A., Maretzek, A., Noble, P.A., & Fretcher, M. (2001). Analysis of genomic sequences by chaos game representation . Bioinformatics, 17, 429-437.
2.
Anderson, J.R. (1976). Language, memory and thought. New York: Erlbaum.
3.
Anderson, J.R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Auyang, S.Y. (1998). Foundations of complex-system theories In economics, evolutionary biology, and statistical physics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Bengtsson, G., Nilsson, E., Rydén, T. & Wiktorsson, M. (2004). Irregular walks and loops combines in small-scale movement of soil insect: Implications for dispersal biology. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 231, 299-306.
6.
Bennett, C.H. (1988). Logical depth and physical complexity. In R. Herken (Ed.), The universal Turing machine; A half-century survey (pp. 227-257). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
Bernstein, A., & Roberts, M. (1958). Computers versus chess player. Scientific American, 198, 96-105.
8.
Carroll, S.B. (2001, February 22). Chance and necessity: The evolution of morphological complexity and diversity. Nature, 409, 1102-1109.
9.
Chaitin, G.J. (1969). On the length of programs for computing finite binary sequences. Journal of Association of Computer Machinery , 13, 547-569.
10.
Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B.F. Skinner's Verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26-58.
11.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1-22.
14.
Crutchfield, J.P. (1994a). The calculi of emergence: Computation, dynamics, and induction. Physica D, 75, 11-54.
15.
Crutchfield, J.P. (1994b). Is anything ever new? Considering emergence. In G. Cowan, D. Pines, & D. Melzner (Eds.), Complexity: Metaphors, models, and reality (pp. 479-497). Redwood City , MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Demetrius, L. (2000). Thermodynamics and evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206, 1-16.
17.
Dennett, D. (1991). Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy , 88, 27-51.
18.
Dreyfus, H. (1972). What computers can't do. New York: Harper & Row.
19.
Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S.E. (1988). Mind over machine. New York : Macmillan.
20.
Elitzur, A.C. (1996). Life's emergence is not an axiom: A reply to Yockey . Journal of Theoretical Biology, 180, 175-180.
21.
Fodor, J.A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.
22.
Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
Fodor, J.A. (1984). Observation reconsidered. Philosophy of Science, 51, 23-43.
24.
Fodor, J.A. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
Fodor, J.A. (2005). Reply to Steven Pinker: `So how does the mind work?' Mind & Language, 20, 25-32.
26.
Fogel, D.B. (1995). Evolutionary computation: Toward a new philosophy of machine intelligence. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
27.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999 ). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Gilbert, S.F., & Sarkar, S. (2000). Embrancing complexity: Organicism for the 21th century. Developmental Dynamics, 219, 1-9.
29.
Gilovich, T.,Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Gold, E.M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10, 447-474.
31.
Goldstein, D.G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75-90.
32.
Gottlieb, G. (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis . Psychological Review, 105, 792-802.
33.
Gould, S.J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Hariri, A., Weber, B., & Olmsted, J., (1990). On the validity of Shannon-information calculations for molecular biological sequences. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 147, 235-254.
35.
Hartmanis, J., & Stearns, R.E. (1965). On the computational complexity of algorithms . Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 117, 285-306.
36.
Holland, J.H. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
Johnston, T.D. (1987). The persistence of dichotomies in the study of behavioral development. Developmental Review, 7, 149-182.
38.
Johnston, T.D., & Edwards, L. (2002). Genes, interactions, and the development of behavior . Psychological Review, 109, 26-34.
39.
Judd, S.J. (1990). Neural network design and the complexity of learning . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
Judd, S.J. (1996). Complexity of learning. In P. Smolensky, M.C. Mozer, & D.E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Mathematical perspectives on neural networks (pp. 113-142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
Keil, F.C. (2003). Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex reality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 368-373.
43.
Kim, J. (1985). Supervenience, determination, and reduction. The Journal of Philosophy, 82, 616-618
44.
Kister, J., Stein, P., Ulam, S., Walden, W., & Wells, M. (1957). Experiments in chess. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 4, 174-177.
45.
Koch, C., & Laurent, G. (1999). Complexity and the nervous system. Science, 284, 96-98.
46.
Kolmogorov, A.N. (1965). Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Problems of Information Transmission, 1, 1-7.
47.
Lasnik, H. (2000). Syntactic structures revisited: Contemporary lectures on classic transformational theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
Lewin, B. (2000). Genes VII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (1997). Introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications. New York: Springer-Verlag .
50.
Minsky, M.L., & Papert, S.A. (1990). Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press . (Original work published 1969)
51.
Mitchell, M., & Taylor, C.E. (1999). Evolutionary computation: An overview. Annual Reviews of Biological Systems, 30, 593-616.
52.
Monasson, R., Zecchina, R., Kirkpatrick, S., Selman, B., & Troyansky, L. (1999, July 8). Determining computational complexity from characteristic `phase transitions'. Nature, 400, 133-137.
53.
Moret, B.M. (1998). The theory of computation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54.
Mossel, E., & Steel, M. (2005). Random biochemical networks: The probability of self-sustaining autocatalysts. Journal of Theoretical Biology , 233, 327-336.
55.
Newell, A. (1955). The chess machine, an example of dealing with a complex task by adaptation. Proceedings of the Western Joint Conference, Los Angeles, March, 101-108.
56.
Newell, A., Shaw, J.C., & Simon, H.A. (1958a). Elements of a theory of human problem solving . Psychological Review, 65, 151-166.
57.
Newell, A., Shaw, J.C., & Simon, H.A. (1958b). Chess playing programs and the problem of complexity . IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2, 320-335.
58.
Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E.A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 279-293). New York: McGraw-Hill.
59.
Oyama, S. (2000). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
60.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York : Norton.
61.
Pross, A. (2003). The driving force for life's emergence: Kinetic and thermodynamic consideration. Journal of Theoretical Biology , 220, 393-406.
62.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computationa and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63.
Saariluoma, P. (1995). Chess players' thinking. London : Routledge.
64.
Sambrook, T., & Whiten, A. (1997). On the nature of complexity in cognitive and behavioural science. Theory & Psychology, 7, 191-213.
65.
Samuel, A.L. (1959). Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3, 210-229.
66.
Schmitt, A.O., & Herzel, H. (1997). Estimating the entropy of DNA sequences. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 188, 369-377.
67.
Shalizi, C.R. (2001). Causal architecture, complexity and self-organization in time series and cellural automata. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
68.
Shanahan, M., & Baars, B. (2005). Applying global workspace theory to the frame problem. Cognition, 93, 157-176.
69.
Shannon, C.E. (1950). Programming a computer for playing chess. Philosophical Magazine, 41, 256-275.
70.
Simon, H.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71.
Solomonoff, R.J. (1964a). A formal theory of inductive inference, part 1. Information and Control, 7, 1-22.
72.
Solomonoff, R.J. (1964b). A formal theory of inductive inference, part 2. Information and Control, 7, 224-254.
73.
Sporns, O., Dante, R.C., Kaiser, M., & Hilgetag, C.C. (2004). Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 418-425.
74.
Stearns, R.E. (1988, June 14-17). Juris Hartmanis: The beginning of computational complexity. Proceedings: Structure in Complexity Theory, Third Annual Conference, 128-134.
75.
Stockmeyer, L.J., & Chandra, A.K. (1979). Provably difficult combinatorial games. SIAM Journal of Computing, 8, 151-174.
76.
Szathmáry, E., Jordán, F., & Pál, C. (2001). Can genes explain biological complexity? Science, 282, 1315-1316.
77.
Thelen, E. (2002). Self-organization in developmental processes: Can systems approaches work? In M. Johnson , Y. Munakata, & R.O. Gilmore (Eds.), Brain development and cognition: A reader (2nd ed.; pp. 336-374). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
78.
Uriagereka, J. (2000). Rhyme and reason: An introduction to minimalist syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
79.
Valiant, L.G. (1984). A theory of the learnable. Communications of ACM, 27, 1134-1142.
80.
Wagner, G. (1998). Complexity matters. Science, 279, 1158-1159.
81.
Weiss, O., Jiménez-Montaño, M.A., & Herzel, H. (2000). Information content of protein sequences. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206, 379-386.
82.
Wicken, J.S. (1979). The generation of complexity in evolution: A thermodynamic and information-theoretical discussion. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 77, 349-365.
