Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this response I enlarge upon three comments by Hoshmand (2003) and Martin (2003). I endorse the recommendation for a pragmatist approach to evaluating research practice, but argue that such an approach alone will not resolve disagreements, for these generally have their origins in other matters. I agree that positivism had a profound influence upon psychology's methodological consensus and explain why it was powerless to resist the imposition of the quantitative imperative upon the discipline. I analyze one instance of Stevens' philosophical syncretism, showing that his attempt to combine the logical positivist view of mathematics with the quantitative imperative in his theory of scales of measurement involved juggling irreconcilable theses. I finish by claiming that it is counter-productive for advocates of qualitative methods to reject traditional scientific values.

Keywords

methodology positivism pragmatism qualitative quantitative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bridgman, P.W. (1936). The nature of physical theory. New York: Wiley.

Carnap, R. (1963). Intellectual autobiography. In P.A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 3-84). La Salle, IL: Open Court.

Carnap, R. (1967). Pseudoproblems in philosophy (R. George, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1928.)

Friedman, M. (1999). Reconsidering logical positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fuller, S. (1997). Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Hoshmand, L.T. (2003). Can lessons of history and logical analysis ensure progress in psychological science? Theory & Psychology, 13, 39-44.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-53.

Martin, J. (2003). Positivism, quantification and the phenomena of psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13, 33-38.

Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

10.

Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355-383.

11.

Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Michell, J. (2000). Normal science, pathological science and psychometrics. Theory & Psychology, 10, 639-667.

13.

Michell, J. (2001). Teaching and misteaching measurement in psychology. Australian Psychologist, 36, 211-217.

14.

Michell, J. (2003). The quantitative imperative: Positivism, naive realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13, 5-31.

15.

Michell, J. (in press). Stevens's theory of scales of measurement and its place in Modern psychology. Australian Journal of Psychology.

16.

Moyer, A.E. (1991). P.W. Bridgman's operational perspective on physics. Part I: Origins and developments. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 22, 237-258.

17.

Porter, T.M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

18.

Stevens, S.S. (1936). Psychology: The propaedeutic science. Philosophy of Science, 3, 90-103.

19.

Stevens, S.S. (1939). Psychology and the science of science. Psychological Bulletin, 36, 221-263.

20.

Stevens, S.S. (1942). Operationism. In D.D. Runes (Ed.), The dictionary of philosophy (pp. 219-220). New York: Philosophical Library.

21.

Stevens, S.S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. In S.S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1-49). New York: Wiley.

22.

Stevens, S.S. (1959). Measurement, psychophysics and utility. In C.W. Churchman & P. Ratoosh (Eds.), Measurement: definitions and theories (pp. 18-63). New York: Wiley.

23.

Thurstone, L.L. (1959). Attitudes can be measured. In The measurement of values (pp. 215-233). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1928.)

Pragmatism,Positivism and the Quantitative Imperative

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References