Can Lessons of History and Logical Analysis Ensure Progress in Psychological Science?

Abstract

A cultural view of science adds an important explanatory dimension to the historical account provided by Michell (2003) for the quantitative imperative. It provides an understanding of the rhetoric of paradigm wars as a cultural, sociological phenomenon. The pragmatist view of science further points to the need for evaluating our research praxis so as to determine the relative merits of diverse inquiry approaches in the interest of making improvements. Whether such progress in psychological science would be facilitated by an evolving metamethodological understanding and an awareness of the culture of academic psychology depends on the extent to which the profession will adopt a self-reflective and critical stance.

Keywords

pragmatism progress qualitative research quantitative imperative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell, D.T. (1988). Methodology and epistemology for the social sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Greenwood, J.D. (1991). Relations and representations: An introduction to the philosophy of social psychological science. New York: Routledge.

Hoshmand, L.T. (1994). Orientation to inquiry in a reflective professional psychology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hoshmand, L.T. (1996). Cultural psychology as metatheory. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 16, 30-48.

Hoshmand, L.T. , & Martin, J. (1994). Naturalizing the epistemology of psychological research. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 14, 171-189.

Hoshmand, L.T. , & Martin, J. (1995). Research as praxis. New York: Teachers College Press.

Katzko, M.W. (2002). The rhetoric of psychological research and the problem of unification in psychology. American Psychologist, 57(4), 262-270.

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Margolis, J. (1986). Pragmatism without foundations: Reconciling realism and relativism. New York: Blackwell.

10.

Michell, J. (2003). The quantitative imperative: Positivism, naive realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13, 5-31.

11.

Nelson, J.S. , Megill, A. , & McCloskey, D.N. (Eds.). (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

12.

Polkinghorne, D.E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.

13.

Polkinghorne, D.E. (1986). Conceptual validity in a nontheoretical human science. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 17, 129-149.

14.

Simons, H.W. (Ed.). (1989). Rhetoric in the human sciences. London: Sage.

15.

Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.