Contributions to reducing online gender harassment: Social re-norming and appealing to empathy as tried-and-failed techniques

Abstract

Inspired by similar methods shown to be effective in reducing online racist harassment, we designed two tweets aimed at reducing online gender harassment. Our interventions were based on the principles of social re-norming and appealing to harassers’ empathy. In a sample of 666 Twitter users engaging in sexist or misogynist tweeting, we found that our intervention tweets did not reduce the number of sexist slurs or sexist users, either 7 days or 31 days after being sent. Our attempts also affected neither the valence nor the arousal of subsequent tweets posted by our sample of Twitter users. We discuss the conceptual, methodological, and ethical challenges associated with activist research aimed at reducing online gender harassment and discuss some of the implications of our attempts to do so.

Keywords

Online gender harassment sexism misogyny social norms empathy social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Action Aid (2016). Three in four women experience harassment and violence in UK and global cities. https://www.actionaid.org.uk/latest-news/three-in-four-women-experience-harassment-and-violence

Adams

. (2018). “They Go for Gender First” The nature and effect of sexist abuse of female technology journalists. Journalism Practice, 12(7), 850–869.

Amnesty International (2017). More than a quarter of UK women experiencing online abuse and harassment receive threats of physical or sexual assault – new research. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/more-quarter-uk-women-experiencing-online-abuse-and-harassment-receive-threats

Amnesty International (2020). Violence against women. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/violence-against-women

Barbera

(2014). streamR: Access to Twitter Streaming API via R. R package version 0.2.1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=streamR

Batson

C. D.

Chang

Orr

Rowland

(2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656–1666. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237647

Chadha

Steiner

Vitak

Ashktorab

(2020). Women’s responses to online harassment. International Journal of Communication, 14, 19.

Chen

G. M.

Pain

Chen

V. Y.

Mekelburg

Springer

Troger

(2020). “You really have to have a thick skin”: A cross-cultural perspective on how online harassment influences female journalists. Journalism, 21(7), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918768500

Cho

Acquisti

(2013). The more social cues, the less trolling? An empirical study of online commenting behavior. The Twelfth Workshop on the Economics of Information Security, Weis.

10.

Citizens Advice (2021). Sexual harassment. https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/what-are-the-different-types-of-discrimination/sexual-harassment/

11.

Citron

(2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Harvard University Press.

12.

Cortina

L. M.

Magley

V. J.

(2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(4), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.247

13.

Cote

A. C.

(2017). “I can defend myself”: Women’s strategies for coping with harassment while gaming online. Games and Culture, 12(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015587603

14.

Czopp

A. M.

Monteith

M. J.

Mark

A. Y.

(2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 784–803. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784

15.

Dai

Saccardo

Han

M. A.

Roh

Raja

Vangala

Modi

Pandya

Sloyan

Croymans

D. M

. (2021). Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature, 597(7876), 404–409.

16.

Dovidio

J. F.

Ten Vergert

Stewart

T. L.

Gaertner

S. L.

Johnson

J. D.

Esses

V. M.

Riek

B. M.

Pearson

A. R.

(2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1537–1549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271177

17.

Drakett

Rickett

Day

Milnes

(2018). Old jokes, new media: Online sexism and constructions of gender in internet memes. Feminism and Psychology, 28(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517727560

18.

Drury

B. J.

Kaiser

C. R.

(2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12083

19.

Eckert

Metzger-Riftkin

(2020). Doxxing, privacy and gendered harassment. The shock and normalization of veillance cultures. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 68(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2020-3-273

20.

Felmlee

Inara Rodis

Zhang

(2020). Sexist slurs: Reinforcing feminine stereotypes online. Sex Roles, 83(1–2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01095-z

21.

Ferrier

Garud-Patkar

(2018). Trollbusters: Fighting online harassment of women journalists. In Vickery

Everback

(Eds.), Mediating misogyny (pp. 311–332). Palgrave Macmillan.

22.

Galinsky

Moskowitz

(2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Pesonality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.708

23.

Galinsky

A. D.

Hall

E. V.

Cuddy

A. J

. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological science, 24(4), 498–506.

24.

Georgeac

O. A.

Rattan

Effron

D. A

. (2019). An exploratory investigation of Americans’ expression of gender bias before and after the 2016 presidential election. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 632–642.

25.

Han

(2018). Searching for an online space for feminism? The Chinese feminist group Gender Watch Women’s Voice and its changing approaches to online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447430

26.

Hancock

L. C.

Henry

N. W.

(2003). Perceptions, norms, and tobacco use of college residence hall freshmen: Evaluation of a social norms marketing intervention. In Perkins

H. W.

(Ed.), The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians (pp. 135–153). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

27.

Herring

(2003). Gender and power in online communication. In Janet Holmes & Mirian Meyerhoff (Eds), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202–228). Blackwell Publishing.

28.

Home Affairs Committee. (2017). Hate crime: Abuse, hate and extremism . https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhaff/609/60902.htm

29.

Hoskin

R. A.

(2019). Femmephobia: The role of anti-femininity and gender policing in LGBTQ+ people’s experiences of discrimination. Sex Roles, 81(11–12), 686–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01021-3

30.

House of Commons (2017). Online harassment and cyber bullying (Issue 07967).

31.

Jane

(2014). Back to the kitchen, cunt: Speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. In Continuum (pp. 558–570). Taylor & Francis.

32.

Jane

(2018). Gendered cyberhate as workplace harassment and economic vandalism. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447344

33.

Jane

(2019). Creepy men slide into women’s DMs all the time, but they can be shut down. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/07/creepy-men-dm-online-harassment

34.

Kilmartin

Smith

Green

Heinzen

Kuchler

Kolar

(2008). A real time social norms intervention to reduce male sexism. Sex Roles, 59(3–4), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9446-y

35.

Lapidot-Lefler

Barak

(2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014

36.

Lindsay

Booth

J. M.

Messing

J. T.

Thaller

(2016). Experiences of online harassment among emerging adults: Emotional reactions and the mediating role of fear. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(19), 3174–3195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584344

37.

Locke

Lawthom

Lyons

. (2018). Social media platforms as complex and contradictory spaces for feminisms: Visibility, opportunity, power, resistance and activism. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 3–10.

38.

Mallett

K. A.

Bachrach

R. L.

Turrisi

(2008). Are all negative consequences truly negative? Assessing variations among college students’ perceptions of alcohol related consequences. Addictive Behaviors, 33(10), 1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.014

39.

Mallett

R. K.

Ford

T. E.

Woodzicka

J. A

. (2021). Ignoring sexism increases women’s tolerance of sexual harassment. Self and Identity, 20(7), 913–929.

40.

Mantilla

(2013). Gendertrolling: Misogyny adapts to new media. Feminist Studies, 39(2), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2013.0039

41.

Matias

(2019). Preventing harassment and increasing group participation through social norms in 2,190 online science discussions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(20), 9785–9789. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813486116

42.

Megarry

(2014). Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women’s experiences in the digital age. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47(PA), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.012

43.

Met Police (2021). I’m being harassed by someone on social media. What can I do? https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/har/harassment-on-social-media/#:∼:text=You can report either harassment, by calling us on 101.

44.

Munger

(2017). Tweetment effects on the tweeted: Experimentally reducing racist harassment. Political Behavior, 39(3), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9373-5

45.

Paluck

E. L.

Green

D. P.

(2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 339–367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607

46.

Pei

Chib

Ling

(2021). Covert resistance beyond# Metoo: Mobile practices of marginalized migrant women to negotiate sexual harassment in the workplace. Information, Communication & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874036

47.

Pennycook

Epstein

Mosleh

Arechar

Eckles

Rand

(2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592(7855), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2

48.

Perkins

H. W.

Craig

D. W.

(2006). A successful social norms campaign to reduce alcohol misuse among college student-athletes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67(6), 880–889. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.880

49.

Regehr

(2022). In (cel) doctrination: How technologically facilitated misogyny moves violence off screens and on to streets. New Media & Society, 24(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820959019

50.

Rights of Women (2021). Rights of Women survey reveals online sexual harassment has increased, as women continue to suffer sexual harassment whilst working through the Covid-19 pandemic. https://rightsofwomen.org.uk/news/rights-of-women-survey-reveals-online-sexual-harassment-has-increased-as-women-continue-to-suffer-sexual-harassment-whilst-working-through-the-covid-19-pandemic/

51.

Ringrose

Lawrence

(2018). Remixing misandry, manspreading, and dick pics: Networked feminist humour on Tumblr. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 686–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450351

52.

Roberts

Donovan

Durey

(2019). Agency, resistance and the non-“ideal” victim: How women deal with sexual violence. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 3(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868019X15633766459801

53.

Schmidt

Wiegand

(2017). A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing, 2012, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-1101

54.

Schultz

P. W.

Nolan

J. M.

Cialdini

R. B.

Goldstein

N. J.

Griskevicius

(2018). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms: Reprise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693325

55.

Schwartz

H. A.

Ungar

L. H.

(2015). Data-driven content analysis of social media: A systematic overview of automated methods. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215569197

56.

Stubbs-Richardson

M. S.

Rader

N. E.

Cosby

A. G.

(2018). Tweeting rape culture: Examining portrayals of victim blaming in discussions of sexual assault cases on Twitter. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517715874

57.

Thompson

(2018). “I can be your Tinder nightmare”: Harassment and misogyny in the online sexual marketplace. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517720226

58.

Turley

Fisher

(2018). Tweeting back while shouting back: Social media and feminist activism. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517715875

59.

Uhl

Rhyner

Lugo

(2018). An examination of nonconsensual pornography websites. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517720225

60.

UN Women UK (2021). Prevalence and reporting of sexual harassment in UK public spaces: A report by the APPG for UN Women (March), 1–28.

61.

Van Hee

Jacobs

Emmery

Desmet

Lefever

Verhoeven

De Pauw

Daelemans

Hoste

(2018). Automatic detection of cyberbullying in social media text. ArXiv, (10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RGQW8

62.

Van Royen

Poels

Vandebosch

Adam

(2017). “Thinking before posting?” Reducing cyber harassment on social networking sites through a reflective message. Computers in Human Behavior, 66(1), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.040

63.

Vera-Gray

(2017). “Talk about a cunt with too much idle time”: Trolling feminist research. Feminist Review, 115(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0038-y

64.

Vescio

T. K.

Sechrist

G. B.

Paolucci

M. P.

(2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.163

65.

Vitis

Gilmour

(2017). Dick pics on blast: A woman’s resistance to online sexual harassment using humour, art and Instagram. Crime, Media, Culture, 13(3), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659016652445

66.

Wang

Chen

Thirunarayan

Sheth

A. P.

(2014). Cursing in English on Twitter. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing – CSCW, 14, 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531734

67.

Warriner

A. B.

Kuperman

Brysbaert

(2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x

68.

Woodzicka

J. A.

Mallett

R. K.

Hendricks

Pruitt

A. V.

(2015). It’s just a (sexist) joke: Comparing reactions to sexist versus racist communications. Humor, 28(2), 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0025

69.

Zimmerman

Kruschwitz

Fox

(2018, May). Improving hate speech detection with deep learning ensembles. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018). https://aclanthology.org/L18-1404.pdf.