IV. Has the psychology of women stopped playing handmaiden to social values?

Brewer W. F. (2012) The theory ladenness of the mental processes used in the scientific enterprise: Evidence from cognitive psychology and the history of science. In: Proctor R. W. Capaldi E. J. (eds) Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes, 2nd Purdue Symposium on Psychological Sciences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 289–334.

Calderón D. Bernal D. D. Huber L. P. Malagón M. C. Vélez V. N. (2012) A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review 82: 513–539.

Campbell, D. T. (1988). Methodology and epistemology for social science: Selected papers (Ed. by E. S. Overman). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Campbell R. Wasco S. M. (2000) Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenets. American Journal of Community Psychology 28: 773–791.

Collins P. H. (1989) The social construction of Black feminist thought. Signs 14: 745–773.

Darwin C. (1882) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, new ed.. New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company.

Denmark F. Russo N. F. Frieze I. H. Sechzer J. A. (1988) Guidelines for avoiding sexism in psychological research: A report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Nonsexist Research. American Psychologist 43: 582–585.

Duarte J. L. Crawford J. T. Stern C. Haidt J. Jussim L. Tetlock P. E. (2015) Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38: e130.

Eagly A. H. (2012) Bias, feminism, and the psychology of investigating gender. In: Proctor R. W. Capaldi E. J. (eds) Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit reasoning, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 267–288.

Eagly A. H. Eaton A. Rose S. M. Riger S. McHugh M. C. (2012) Feminism and psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist 67: 211–230.

Eagly A. H. Riger S. (2014) Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist 69: 685–702.

Eagly A. H. Wood W. (2013a) Feminism and evolutionary psychology: Moving forward. Sex Roles 69: 549–556.

Eagly A. H. Wood W. (2013b) The nature–nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8: 340–357.

Fine M. Gordon S. M. (1989) Feminist transformations of/despite psychology. In: Crawford M. Gentry M. (eds) Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives, New York, NY: Springer Verlag, pp. 146–174.

Gergen M. M. (2001) Social constructionist theory. In: Worell J. (eds) Encyclopedia of women and gender: Sex similarities and differences and the impact of society on gender Vol. 2San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 1043–1058.

Hanson N. R. (1958) Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Harding S. (1993) Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity?In: Alcoff L. Potter E. (eds) Feminist epistemologies, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 352–384.

Hare-Mustin R. T. Marecek J. (1988) The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist 43: 455–464.

Hartsock N. (1983) The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground of a specifically feminist historical materialism. In: Harding S. Hintikka M. (eds) Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel, pp. 283–310.

Hull C. L. (1943) Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory, New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Jackson S. Vares T. Gill R. (2013) “The whole playboy mansion image”: Girls fashioning and fashioned selves within a postmodern culture. Feminism & Psychology 23: 143–162.

McHugh M. C. Koeske R. D. Frieze I. H. (1986) Issues to consider in conducting nonsexist psychological research: A guide for researchers. American Psychologist 41: 879–890.

Magnusson E. Marecek J. (2012) Gender and culture in psychology: Theories and practices, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mazei, J., Hüffmeier, J., Freund, P. A., Stuhlmacher, A. F., Bilke, L., & Hertel, G. (2015). A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators. Psychological bulletin, 141, 85–104.

Mazur A. Booth A. (1998) Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21(03): 353–363.

Mill J. S. (1869) The subjection of women, New York, NY: Appleton.

Miller, D. E. (2014). Harriet Taylor Mill. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/harriet-mill/.

Morawski J. G. (2005) Reflexivity and the psychologist. History of the Human Sciences 18: 77–105.

Olesen V. (1994) Feminisms and models of qualitative research. In: Denzin N. K. Lincoln Y. S. (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 158–174.

Orne M. T. (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist 17: 776–783.

Petersen A. J. (2012) Imagining the possibilities: Qualitative inquiry at the intersections of race, gender, disability, and class. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 25: 801–818.

Proctor R. W. Capaldi E. J. (2006) Why science matters: Understanding the methods of psychological research, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Riger S. (1992) Epistemological debates, feminist voices: Science, social values, and the study of women. American Psychologist 47: 730–740.

Rudberg M. Nielsen H. B. (2005) Potential spaces—Subjectivities and gender in a generational perspective. Feminism & Psychology 15: 127–148.

Russo N. F. Denmark F. L. (1987) Contributions of women to psychology. Annual Review of Psychology 38(1): 279–298.

Sherif C. (1979) Bias in psychology. In: Sherman J. A. Beck E. T. (eds) The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 92–133.

Shields S. (1975) Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women. American Psychologist 30: 739–754.

Smith, C. A., & Konik, J. A. (Eds.) (2011). Feminist reappraisals of evolutionary psychology. [Special issue]. Sex Roles, 64(9–10).

Taylor Y. (2011) Intersectional dialogues—A politics of possibility?. Feminism & Psychology 21: 211–217.

Unger R. K. (1990) Imperfect reflections of reality: Psychology constructs gender. In: Hare-Mustin R. T. Marecek J. (eds) Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 102–149.

van Anders S. M. Goldey K. L. Kuo P. X. (2011) The steroid/peptide theory of social bonds: Integrating testosterone and peptide responses for classifying social behavioral contexts. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36: 1265–1275.

van Anders S. M. Hamilton L. D. Schmidt N. Watson N. V. (2007) Associations between testosterone secretion and sexual activity in women. Hormones and Behavior 51: 477–482.

van Anders S. M. Watson N. V. (2006) Relationship status and testosterone in North American heterosexual and non-heterosexual men and women: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31: 715–723.

Weisstein N. (1968) Kinder, Kirche, Kuche as scientific law: Psychology constructs the female, Boston, MA: New England Press.

Wood W. Eagly A. H. (2010) Gender. In: Fiske S. T. Gilbert D. T. Lindzey G. (eds) Handbook of social psychology Vol. 15th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 629–667.

Worell J. Etaugh C. (1994) Transforming theory and research with women: Themes and variations. Psychology of Women Quarterly 18: 443–450.

Zammito J. H. (2004) A nice derangement of epistemes: Post-positivism in the study of science from Quine to Latour, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.