Sexual harassment has received unprecedented attention in recent years. Within academia, it has a particularly reflexive relationship with the human sciences in which sexual harassment can be both an object of research and a problematic behavior amongst those engaged in that research. This paper offers a partial history in which these two are brought together as a common object of social psychology’s culture of sexual harassment. Here we follow Haraway in using culture to capture the sense-making that psychologists do through and to the side of their formal knowledge production practices. Our history is multi-sited and draws together (1) the use of sexual harassment as an experimental technique, (2) feminist activism and research which made sexual harassment an object of knowledge in social psychology, and (3) oral history accounts of sexual harassment amongst social psychologists. By reading these contexts against each other, we provide a thick description of how sexual harassment initiates women and men into cultures of control in experimental social psychology and highlight the ethical-epistemological dilemma inherent in disciplinary practices.
American Psychological Association (1977, March) Revised ethical standards of psychologists. APA Monitor8(3): 22–23.
4.
ArgyleM. (2001) The development of social psychology in Oxford. In: BunnG.LovieA. D.RichardsG. D. (eds) Psychology in Britain: Historical essays and personal reflections, New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 333–343.
5.
AronsonE. (2007) Elliot Aronson. In: LindzeyG.RunyanW. M. (eds) A history of psychology in autobiography, Vol. IX, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 3–41.
6.
AronsonE. (2010) Not by chance alone: My life as a social psychologist, New York, NY: Basic Books.
7.
AronsonE.CarlsmithJ. M. (1968) Experimentation in social psychology. In: LindzeyG.AronsonE. (eds) The handbook of social psychology. Vol.2, Research methods, 2nd ed.. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 1–79.
8.
AronsonE.MillsJ. (1959) The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology59(2): 177.
9.
Aronson, E., Brewer, M. B., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1985). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 441–486). New York, NY: Random House.
10.
BakerC. N. (2008) The women’s movement against sexual harassment, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BaumrindD. (1964) Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram’s “Behavioral Study of Obedience.”. American Psychologist19(6): 421–423.
12.
Billig, M. (1999, October 1). Interview by Sandra Cameron [Audio recording]. PSY/TAJ/8/1: Box 64, Henry Tajfel papers, Wellcome Library, London, UK.
13.
BramelD. (1962) A dissonance theory approach to defensive projection. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology64(2): 121–129.
14.
BramelD. (1963) Selection of a target for defensive projection. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology66(4): 318–324.
15.
Breakwell, G. (1999, November 9). Interview by Sandra Cameron [Audio recording]. PSY/TAJ/8/1: Box 64, Henry Tajfel papers, Wellcome Library, London, UK.
16.
BreakwellG. M. (1979) Woman: Group and identity?Women’s Studies International Quarterly2(1): 9–17.
17.
Brown, M. (1999, November 18). Interview by Sandra Cameron [Audio recording]. PSY/TAJ/8/1: Box 64, Henry Tajfel papers, Wellcome Library, London, UK.
18.
BrownR. (1978) Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In: TajfelH. (eds) Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, London, UK: Academic Press, pp. 395–429.
19.
Brown, R. (1999, July 9). Interview by Sandra Cameron [Audio recording]. PSY/TAJ/8/1: Box 64, Henry Tajfel papers, Wellcome Library, London, UK.
20.
BrownR. (in preparation) Henri Tajfel: Explorer of identity and difference, Abingdon: Routledge.
21.
CherryF. E. (1995) The “stubborn particulars” of social psychology: Essays on the research process, London, UK: Routledge.
22.
CollierG.MintonH. L.ReynoldsG. (1991) Currents of thought in American social psychology, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
CollinsH. M. (1985) Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice, London, UK: SAGE.
24.
CondorS. (1989) “Biting into the future”: Social change and the social identity of women. In: SkevingtonS.BakerD. (eds) The social identity of women, London, UK: SAGE, pp. 15–39.
25.
Interview A. Interview by Sandra Cameron [Audio recording]. PSY/TAJ/8/1: Box 64, Henry Tajfel papers, Wellcome Library, London, UK.
26.
CrouchM. A. (2000) Thinking about sexual harassment: A guide for the perplexed, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
DanzigerK. (2000) Making social psychology experimental: A conceptual history, 1920–1970. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences36(4): 329–347.
28.
DumontK.LouwJ. (2009) A citation analysis of Henri Tajfel’s work on intergroup relations. International Journal of Psychology44(1): 46–59.
29.
Eiser, J. R. (1999). Interview by Sandra Cameron [Audio recording]. PSY/TAJ/8/1: Box 64, Henry Tajfel papers, Wellcome Library, London, UK.
30.
Ethical principles of psychologists. (1981). American Psychologist, 36(6), 633–638.
31.
FayeC. (2012) American social psychology: Examining the contours of the 1970s crisis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences43(2): 514–521.
FitzgeraldL. F.ShullmanS. L. (1993) Sexual harassment: A research analysis and agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Vocational Behavior42(1): 5–27.
34.
ForellC. A.MatthewsD. M. (2000) A law of her own: The reasonable woman as a measure of man, New York, NY: NYU Press.
35.
Fraser, C. (1999, October 14). Interview by Sandra Cameron [Audio recording]. PSY/TAJ/8/1: Box 64, Henry Tajfel papers, Wellcome Library, London, UK.
36.
FrischS. (1979, April) In progress: Task force on sexual harassment of students. Division 35 Newsletter6(2): 9.
37.
Gallivan, J. (2008, June 14). Interview by A. Rutherford [Video recording]. Psychology’s Feminist Voices Oral History and Online Archive Project. Halifax, NS. Retrieved from http://www.feministvoices.com/joanne-gallivan.
38.
GaveyN. (2005) Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape, New York, NY: Psychology Press.
39.
GerardH. B.MathewsonG. C. (1966) The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology2: 278–287.
40.
GergenK. J. (1973) Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology26(2): 309–320.
41.
GierynT. F. (2002) Three truth-spots. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences38(2): 113–132.
Greenglass, E. (2005, March 1). Interview by A. Rutherford [Video recording]. Psychology’s Feminist Voices Oral History and Online Archive Project. Toronto, ON. Retrieved from http://www.feministvoices.com/esther-greenglass.
44.
GutekB. A.NakamuraC. Y.GahartM.HandschumacherI.RussellD. (1980) Sexuality and the workplace. Basic and Applied Social Psychology1(3): 255–265.
45.
HarawayD. J. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience, New York, NY: Routledge.
HermanE. (1996) The romance of American psychology: Political culture in the age of experts, Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
48.
KellerE. F. (1985) Reflections on gender and science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
KelmanH. C. (1967) Human use of human subjects: The problem of deception in social psychological experiments. Psychological Bulletin67(1): 1–11.
50.
KimS.RutherfordA. (2015) From seduction to sexism: Feminists challenge the ethics of therapist–client sexual relations in 1970s America. History of Psychology18(3): 283–296.
LubekI.StamH. J. (1995) Ludico-experimentation in social psychology: Somber scientific versus playful prescriptions. In: LubekI.van HezewijkR.PhetersonG.TolmanC. W. (eds) Trends and issues in theoretical psychology, New York, NY: Springer.
53.
MaassA.CadinuM.GuarnieriG.GrasselliA. (2003) Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85(5): 853.
54.
MarquesJ. M.YzerbytV. Y.LeyensJ.-P. (1988) The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology18(1): 1–16.
55.
MorawskiJ. G. (1994) Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology: Notes on a liminal science, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
56.
MorawskiJ. G. (2005) Reflexivity and the psychologist. History of the Human Sciences18(4): 77–105.
57.
MoscoviciS.MarkovàI. (2006) The making of modern social psychology: The hidden story of how an international social science was created, New York, NY: Wiley.
58.
OrneM. T.HollandC. H. (1968) On the ecological validity of laboratory deceptions. International Journal of Psychiatry6(4): 282–293.
59.
PatnoeS. (1988) A narrative history of experimental social psychology: The Lewin tradition, New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
60.
Pettit, M. (in press). Replication in psychology: Historical dispatches from a discipline on fire.
61.
PopeK. S.LevensonH.SchoverL. R. (1979) Sexual intimacy in psychology training: Results and implications of a national survey. American Psychologist34(8): 682–689.
62.
Potter, C. (2012). When radical feminism talks back: Taking an ethnographic turn in the living past. In C. B. Potter & R. C. Romano (Eds.), Doing recent history: On privacy, copyright, video games, institutional review boards, activist scholarship, and history that talks back (pp. 155–182). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
63.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour, London, UK: SAGE.
64.
PryorJ. B.GieddJ. L.WilliamsK. B. (1995) A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues51(1): 69–84.
65.
PykeS. W. (1996) Sexual harassment and sexual intimacy in learning environments. Canadian Psychology; Ottawa37(1): 13–22.
66.
RosenthalM. N.SmidtA. M.FreydJ. J. (2016) Still second class: Sexual harassment of graduate students. Psychology of Women Quarterly40(3): 364–377.
67.
RutherfordA. (2017) Surveying rape: Feminist social science and the ontological politics of sexual assault. History of the Human Sciences30(4): 100–123.
68.
Rutherford, A., Capdevila, R., Undurti, V., & Palmary, I. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of international feminisms: Perspectives on psychology, women, culture, and rights. New York, NY: Springer.
69.
SandlerB. R. (2007) Title IX: How we got it and what a difference it made. Cleveland State Law Review55(4): 473–489.
70.
ScheibeK. E. (1988) Metamorphoses in the psychologist’s advantage. In: MorawskiJ. G. (eds) The rise of experimentation in American psychology, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 53–71.
71.
ScottJ. W. (1991) The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry17(4): 773–797.
72.
ShieldsS. A. (2007) Passionate men, emotional women: Psychology constructs gender difference in the late 19th century. History of Psychology10: 92–110.
73.
Skevington, S. (1999, November 16). Interview by Sandra Cameron [Audio recording]. PSY/TAJ/8/1: Box 64, Henry Tajfel papers, Wellcome Library, London, UK.
74.
Skevington, S., & Baker, D. (Eds.). (1989). The social identity of women. London: SAGE.
75.
StamH. J.RadtkeH. L.LubekI. (2000) Strains in experimental social psychology: A textual analysis of the development of experimentation in social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences36(4): 365–382.
76.
Stark, C. (2009, June 6). Interview by A. Rutherford, K. Vaughn, & L. Ball [Video recording]. Psychology’s Feminist Voices Oral History and Online Archive Project. Montreal, QC. Retrieved from http://www.feministvoices.com/cannie-stark.
77.
StarkL. (2010) The science of ethics: Deception, the resilient self, and the APA code of ethics, 1966–1973. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences46(4): 337–370.
78.
Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 69–119). London, UK: Academic Press.
79.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
80.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology1(2): 149–178.
81.
TurnerJ. (1996) Henri Tajfel: An introduction. In: RobinsonW. P. (eds) Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel, Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 1–23.
WestC. M. (2010) Resistance as recovery: Winning a sexual harassment complaint. In: WhiteA. M. (eds) African Americans doing feminism: Putting theory into everyday practice, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 175–188.
84.
WetherellM. (1998) Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society9(3): 387–412.
85.
Wetherell, M. (1999, November 26). Interview by Sandra Cameron [Audio recording]. PSY/TAJ/8/1: Box 64, Henry Tajfel papers, Wellcome Library, London, UK.
86.
White, A. (2011, March 4). Interview by A. Rutherford & L. Ball [Video recording]. Psychology’s Feminist Voices Oral History and Online Archive Project. Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://www.feministvoices.com/aaronette-white.
87.
WhiteH. V. (1973) Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
88.
WilkinsonS. (1986) Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice, London, UK: Open University Press.
89.
WilliamsJ. A. (1984) Gender and intergroup behaviour: Towards an integration. British Journal of Social Psychology23(4): 311–316.
90.
WilsonT. D.AronsonE.CarlsmithK. (2010) The art of laboratory experimentation. In: FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. I, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 51–81.
91.
WoodzickaJ. A.LaFranceM. (2001) Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues57(1): 15–30.
92.
WoodzickaJ. A.LaFranceM. (2001) Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues57(1): 15–30.
