Tradwife Influencers and the Mainstreaming of Alt-Right Femininity: A Visual Motif Analysis of Gendered Extremism Online

Abstract

This study examines the Tradwife influencer movement, an online phenomenon with a wide reach that romanticizes traditional gender roles and women's domestic submission, as an evolution of postfeminism into the conservative and alt-right domains. Drawing on feminist psychological methodology and using visual motif analysis, a novel multimodal qualitative method for analyzing visual media, we analyzed influential Tradwives across TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram. Our data primarily consisted of Tradwives from the U.S., but also included others from English-speaking countries. Four visual motifs were identified (Christian Fundamentalist, Domestic Goddess, Rural Libertarian, and Reformed Feminist), alongside five textual themes shaping their ideological landscape (Gender Essentialism, Pronatalism, White Supremacy, Christian Supremacy, Anti-Science Misinformation). Across these archetypes and ideologies, we found that postfeminist sentiments of choice, empowerment, and self-branding were rearticulated to uphold patriarchal, essentialist, White¹ supremacist, and Christian nationalist sentiments. Drawing on Lopes’s concept of meaning vertigo, we interpret the appeal of Tradwives as a psychological response to existential disorientation under late capitalism, heightened national attention to identity politics and social justice, and neoliberal gender politics, offering simplistic, nostalgic hierarchy and order amid social flux. This study extends feminist psychological inquiry into digital culture, showcasing how emotion, aesthetics, and algorithmic visibility coalesce to normalize reactionary gender ideologies and reframe patriarchal submission as a feminist choice.

Keywords

postfeminism visual motif analysis neoliberalism feminist psychology social media cultural studies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abetz

Moore

(2018). “Welcome to the mommy wars, ladies”: Making sense of the ideology of combative mothering in mommy blogs. Communication, Culture and Critique, 11(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcy008

Agnew

(2024, July 20). Meet the queen of the “Trad wives” (and her eight children). The Sunday Times. https://www.thetimes.com/magazines/the-sunday-times-magazine/article/meet-the-queen-of-the-trad-wives-and-her-eight-children-plfr50cgk

Ajmal

(2024). Charting youth subcultures, identity formation, and niche aesthetics in the age of social media. Journal of English Literature and Cultural Studies, 5(1), 22–29. https://www.jelcsjournal.com/article_205902.html

Allen

O. M.

Trujillo

M. Z.

Welles

B. F.

(2025). From flowers to fascism? The cottagecore to Tradwife pipeline on Tumblr. Social Media + Society, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251413920

Askanius

(2022). Women in the Nordic resistance movement and their online media practices: Between internalised misogyny and “embedded feminism.” Feminist Media Studies, 22(7), 1763–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1916772

Banducci

(2025). The importance of preserving the United States Department of Education's authority under title IX in the fight to protect LGBTQ rights. https://www.marylandlawreview.org/volume-84-spring-online-notes/blog-post-title-three-bry5g-ax9tk

Banet-Weiser

(2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002772

Banet-Weiser

Reinis

(2026). The rage of Tradwives: Affective economies and romanticizing retreat. Feminist Theory, 27(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001251371971

Bartky

S. L.

(1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203825259

10.

Basker

Farvid

Riccardi

McGinley

Nathan

Frasier

(2026). Unpacking (Alt-Right) postfeminist sensibilities: Theorizing the tradwife influencer movement through case study analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 50(2), 132–148.

11.

Beck

Lakkala

(2025). Rewriting femininity: Tradwives, visual aesthetics of class, and politics of remembrance. Femina Politica, 34(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.3224/feminapolitica.v34i1.06

12.

Billig

(1988). The notion of ‘prejudice’: Some rhetorical and ideological aspects. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 8(1–2), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.1-2.91

13.

Bower

L. J.

(2024). The thorn in feminism’s side: Black feminist reconceptualization and defence of #tradwives and the #tradwife movement. Journal of Gender Studies, 34(7), 1037–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2024.2423198

14.

Callander

Farvid

Baradaran

Vance

T. A.

(2024). Sexual racism and social justice: Reckoning with white supremacy and desire. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197605509.001.0001

15.

Campion

(2020). Women in the extreme and radical right: Forms of participation and their implications. Social Sciences, 9(9), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9090149

16.

Cleary

(2023, March 2). Wife gave up her career to be a professional homemaker and a housewife. Mail Online. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/real-life/article-11814139/Wife-Estee-Williams-gave-career-homemaker-housewife-Tradwife.html

17.

Coen-Sanchez

Ebenso

El-Mowafi

I. M.

Berghs

Idriss-Wheeler

Yaya

(2022). Repercussions of overturning Roe v. Wade for women across systems and beyond borders. Reproductive Health, 19(1), 184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01490-y

18.

Crompton

Lyonette

(2005). The new gender essentialism—domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes 1. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00085.x

19.

Deem

(2023). “Feminine, not feminist”: Trad truth-making on social media. Ethnologia Europaea, 53(2), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.8841

20.

DeStefanis

(2025, September 29). The rise of the MAHA movement and implications for women. Feminist Majority Foundation. https://feminist.org/news/the-rise-of-the-maha-movement-and-implications-for-women/

21.

Dill

B. T.

(2024). Race, class and gender: Prospects for an all-inclusive sisterhood. In Women and symbolic interaction (pp. 159–176). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003516736-13

22.

Duchesne

Shaw

Sawyer

Barata

Radtke

(2026). Advancing a plural, reflexive, and inclusive psychology through feminist mentoring. Feminism & Psychology, 36(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535251404121

23.

Dworkin

(2025). Right-Wing women. Random House.

24.

Edwards

(2019). African Americans and the Southern Homestead Act. Great Plains Quarterly, 39(2), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1353/gpq.2019.0018

25.

Elmhirst

(2024, March 29). The rise and fall of the Trad Wife. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-trad-wife

26.

Evans

Riley

(2014). Technologies of sexiness: Sex, identity, and consumer culture. Oxford University Press.

27.

Fahs

McClelland

S. I.

(2016). When sex and power collide: An argument for critical sexuality studies. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1152454

28.

Fahs

Plante

R. F.

McClelland

S. I.

(2017). Working at the crossroads of pleasure and danger: Feminist perspectives on doing critical sexuality studies. Sexualities, 21(4), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717713743

29.

Farvid

Braun

Rowney

(2017a). ‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: Women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(5), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818

30.

Farvid

Mousa

(2017b). Introducing visual motif analysis for psychology and the social sciences. Psychology of Women Section Conference (British Psychological Society), UK.

31.

Farvid

Mousa

(2017c). Introducing visual motif analysis: A critical method for psychology and the social sciences. International Society of Critical Health Psychology Biennial Conference, Loughborough, UK.

32.

Farvid

Mousa

(2017d). Introducing visual motif analysis for psychology and the social sciences. Qualitative Methods in Psychology Conference (British Psychological Society), UK.

33.

Finchelstein

(2020). A brief history of fascist lies (1st ed.). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw1d5z9

34.

Gavey

(2012). Beyond “empowerment”? sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 718–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0069-3

35.

Gergen

K. J.

(1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.40.3.266

36.

Gill

(2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898

37.

Gill

(2017). The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: A postfeminist sensibility 10 years on. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(6), 606–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417733003

38.

Gill

(2021). Neoliberal beauty. In Elias

Gill

Scharff

(Eds.), The Routledge companion to beauty politics (pp. 9–18). Routledge.

39.

Gill

Donaghue

(2013). As if postfeminism had come true: The turn to agency in cultural studies of ‘sexualisation’. In Madhok

Phillips

Wilson

(Eds.), Gender, agency, and coercion (pp. 240–258). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295613_14

40.

Giolo

(2025). Cultural transgressions and media contestation: A qualitative study of the tradwife trend in Dutch media. Popular Communication, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2025.2560859

41.

Goel

Gupta

(2020). Social media in the times of COVID-19. JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, 26(6), 220–223. https://doi.org/10.1097/rhu.0000000000001508

42.

Goldberg

(2025). ‘Less burnout, more babies’: How conservatives are winning young women. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/23/style/trump-maga-women.html

43.

Gonzalez

(2022). Reproducing for the race: Eugenics, “race suicide,” and the origins of white replacement conspiracy theories, 1882–1924 [Master’s thesis]. University of California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0v38s4hm

44.

Gupta

(1991). Politics of gender: Women in Nazi Germany. Economic and Political Weekly, 26(17), 40–48. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4397988

45.

Hamilton

B. E.

, et al. (2024). Births: Provisional data for 2023 (Vital Statistics Rapid Release; No. 35). National Center for Health Statistics. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/151797

46.

Hanisch

(1970). The personal is political. In Firestone

Koedt

(Eds.), Notes from the second year: Women's liberation. Radical feminism . Notes from the Second Year. https://womenwritingarchitecture.org/citation/the-personal-is-political/

47.

Hare-Mustin

R. T.

Marecek

(1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist, 43(6), 455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.6.455

48.

Harrison

Rowley

S. B.

(2011). Babies by the bundle: Gender, backlash, and the Quiverfull movement. Feminist Formations, 23(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2011.0012

49.

Hevey

(2018). Network analysis: A brief overview and tutorial. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2018.1521283

50.

Hirshman

Larson

J. E.

(1998). Hard bargains: The politics of sex. Oxford University Press.

51.

Hoffmann

D. L.

Timm

A. F.

(2009). Utopian biopolitics: Reproductive policies, gender roles, and sexuality in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. In Geyer

Fitzpatrick

(Eds.), Beyond totalitarianism (pp. 87–129). Cambridge University Press.

52.

Hooks

(2008). Reel to real: Race, class, and sex at the movies (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203440919

53.

(2023, March 20). The feminine mistake. Harper’s Magazine. https://harpers.org/archive/2023/04/the-feminine-mistake-zoe-hu-tradlife-Tradwife-capitalism/

54.

Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2023, March). Reflecting on all women’s history this March. IWPR. https://iwpr.org/reflecting-on-all-womens-history-this-march/

55.

Jonko

(2025, April 22). $5,000, scholarships, medals: Why Trump is pushing women to have more babies. NDTV. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/5-000-scholarships-medals-why-donald-trump-is-pushing-women-to-have-more-babies-8229317?

56.

Joyce

(2009). Quiverfull: Inside the Christian patriarchy movement. Beacon Press.

57.

Kandiyoti

(1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004

58.

Klofstad

Christley

Diekman

Kübler

Enders

Funchion

Littrell

Murthi

Premaratne

Seelig

Verdear

Wuchty

Drochon

Uscinski

(2025). Belief in white replacement. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 13(2), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2024.2342834

59.

Lafrance

M. N.

Wigginton

(2019). Doing critical feminist research: A feminism & psychology reader. Feminism & Psychology, 29(4), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353519863075

60.

Leidig

(2023). The women of the far right: Social media influencers and online radicalization. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/leid21016

61.

Liporace

(2024, September 25). Tradwives: A superficial threat to feminism but deeper divide among women. The Emory Wheel. https://www.emorywheel.com/article/2024/09/Tradwives-a-superficial-threat-to-feminism-but-deeper-divide-among-women

62.

Loke

Bachmann

Harp

(2017). Co-opting feminism: Media discourses on political women and the definition of a (new) feminist identity. Media, Culture & Society, 39(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715604890

63.

Lopes

F. M.

(2019). Perpetuating the patriarchy: Misogyny and (post-)feminist backlash. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 176(9), 2517–2538. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45211664 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1138-z

64.

Love

N. S.

(2020). Shield maidens, fashy femmes, and tradwives: Feminism, patriarchy, and right-wing populism. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.619572

65.

Mattheis

(2021). #Tradculture: Reproducing whiteness and neo-fascism through gendered discourse online. In Hunter

van der Westhuizen

(Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical studies in whiteness (pp. 91–101). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429355769-7

66.

McRobbie

(2004). Post-feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468077042000309937

67.

Mendes

Ringrose

Keller

(2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press.

68.

Merlan

(2021, October 26). Anti-Vaxxers are making a play for the hearts, minds, and wombs of young women. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/article/anti-vaxxer-fertility-evie-magazine-classical-femininity/

69.

Moghadam

V. M.

(2018). Gendering the new right-wing populisms: A research note. Journal of World-Systems Research, 24(2), 293–303. https://dx.https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2018.853

70.

Molas

(2022). Dutch Flags and maple leaves: How conspiracy theories created a transnational far-right. Atlantisch Perspectief, 46(6), 26–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48732646

71.

Morales

(2024, April 13). A quick guide to the Tradwives making every meal from scratch and getting millions of views. Jezebel. https://www.jezebel.com/a-non-exhaustive-guide-to-the-tiktok-Tradwives-clogging-up-your-feed

72.

Mousa

Farvid

(2022). Visual motif analysis: A qualitative method for analyzing visual data online. In SAGE research methods: Doing research online. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529601800

73.

Nickerson

M. M.

(2014). Mothers of conservatism: Women and the postwar right. Princeton University Press.

74.

Perry

S. L.

McElroy

E. E.

Schnabel

Grubbs

J. B.

(2022). Fill the earth and subdue it: Christian nationalism, ethno-religious threat and nationalist pronatalism. Sociological Forum, 37(4), 995–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12854

75.

Petchesky

R. P.

(1981). Antiabortion, antifeminism, and the rise of the New Right. Feminist Studies, 7(2), 206–246. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177522

76.

Piers Morgan Uncensored. (2023, October 15). The ‘female Andrew Tate’ Pearl Davis on why she thinks women shouldn't vote. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHs7p6o5oBo

77.

Potter

Wetherell

(1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage Publications.

78.

Potts

(2003). The science/fiction of sex: Feminist deconstruction and the vocabularies of heterosex. Routledge.

79.

Power

(2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the care burden of women and families. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1776561

80.

Proctor

(2022). The #Tradwife persona and the rise of radicalized domesticity. Persona Studies, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.21153/psj2022vol8no2art1645

81.

Purdue

S. A.

(2022). ‘A battle of the groin’: The reproductive politics of the global extreme-right, 1969–2009. In Race, gender and violence on the transatlantic extreme right, 1969–2009 (pp. 21–54). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13889-8_2

82.

Rosenfeld

D. L.

Tomiyama

A. J.

(2021). Can a pandemic make people more socially conservative? Political ideology, gender roles, and the case of COVID-19. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12745

83.

Rossy

K. M.

(2011). Politicizing pronatalism: Exploring the Nazi ideology of women through the lens of visual propaganda, 1933–1939. The Graduate History Review, 3(1). https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ghr/article/view/6478

84.

Rothermel

A.-K.

(2023). The role of evidence-based misogyny in antifeminist online communities of the ‘manosphere'. Big Data and Society, 10(1).

85.

Rudman

L. A.

Glick

P. S.

(2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. The Guilford Press.

86.

Schlegel

(2019, October 2). Chambers of secrets? Cognitive echo chambers and the role of social media in facilitating them. VOX - Pol. https://voxpol.eu/chambers-of-secrets-cognitive-echo-chambers-and-the-role-of-social-media-in-facilitating-them/

87.

Scott

Day

(2025). TikTok tradwives: Femininity, reproduction, and social media. Gender and Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2025.2546050

88.

Solé

(2023, March 7). Cooking, cleaning and controversy: The ‘tradwife’ movement embraces a 1950s housewife ideal. Today.Com. https://www.today.com/parents/family/traditional-wives-Tradwives-controversy-tiktok-rcna67253

89.

Spiro

M. E.

(1999). Gender ideology and psychological reality: An essay on cultural reproduction. Yale University Press.

90.

Stanley

(2018). How fascism works: The politics of us and them. Random House.

91.

Stanley

(2024). Erasing history: How fascists rewrite the past to control the future. One Signal Publishers.

92.

Stotzer

R. L.

Nelson

(2025b). The (anti)feminism of tradwives. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2025.2463588

93.

Sykes

Hopner

(2024). Tradwives: Right-wing social media influencers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 53(4), 453–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416241246273

94.

Tavris

(2011). Psychobabble and biobunk: Using psychological science to think critically about popular psychology (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

95.

Tebaldi

(2025). Pearl nationalism: Tradwives and the chronotopes of femininity. Signs and Society, 13(4), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/sas.2025.10024

96.

The White House. (2025a, February). President Trump is delivering on his commitment to protect our kids. https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/02/president-trump-is-delivering-on-his-commitment-to-protect-our-kids/

97.

The White House. (2025b, January). Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government [Executive order]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/

98.

Thorogood

(2023). Race, class and gender: The politics of housework. Give and Take in Families, 18–41. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003409786-2

99.

Tolman

(2005). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674044364

100.

Unger

R. K.

Crawford

M. E.

(1992). Women and gender: A feminist psychology. Temple University Press.

101.

Weiss

Koban

Matthes

(2024). A narrow gateway from misogyny to the far right: Empirical evidence for social media exposure effects. Information, Communication & Society, 28(13), 2377–2395. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2024.2445637

102.

Whittaker

Looney

Reed

Votta

(2021). Recommender systems and the amplification of extremist content. Internet Policy Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1565

103.

Widdows

(2018). Perfect me: Beauty as an ethical ideal. Princeton University Press.

104.

Wigginton

Lafrance

M. N.

(2019). Learning critical feminist research: A brief introduction to feminist epistemologies and methodologies. Feminism & Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353519866058

105.

Wilicki

(2019). A matriarch to his patriarchy: Hitler's search for Nazi Germany's mother. Rutgers JL & Religion, 20, 377.

106.

Wilm

(2018). “The Indians must yield”: Antebellum free land, the Homestead Act, and the displacement of native peoples. Great Plains Quarterly, 38(1), 1–23. https://www.ghi-dc.org/fileadmin/publications/Bulletin/bu67/17.pdf

107.

Wolf

(1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. William Morrow.

108.

Wooten

M. E.

Branch

E. H.

(2012). Defining appropriate labor: Race, gender, and idealization of black women in domestic service. Race, Gender & Class, 19(3/4), 292–308. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43497500

109.

Zahay

M. L.

(2022). What “real” women want: Alt-right femininity vlogs as an anti-feminist populist aesthetic. Media and Communication, 10(4), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5726

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

1.41 MB