This study investigates the experiences and the related social change attitudes of pious Muslim women in Turkey. Twenty self-identified pious women living in Istanbul were interviewed about their experiences of disadvantage based on gender and religious identity, the position of women in religious teachings and practices, and attitudes towards the women's movement. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants expressed facing distinct forms of marginalization in secular and religious settings, leading to a state of “in-betweenness” characterized by a psychological distance from both communities. Participants' attitudes regarding social change, and how they voiced their critiques about women's issues, were also informed by the tensions between the two contexts. Findings suggest that this state of “in-betweenness” may decrease pious women's intentions to act and limit their potential for activism.
Abu-LughodL. (1990) The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist17: 41–55.
2.
AmerA.HowarthC.SenR. (2015) Diasporic virginities: Social representations of virginity and identity formation amongst British Arab Muslim women. Culture & Psychology21: 3–19.
3.
AnthiasF. (2012) Hierarchies of social location, class and intersectionality: Towards a translocational frame. International Sociology28: 121–138.
4.
AratY. (2016) Islamist women and feminist concerns in contemporary Turkey: Prospects for women's rights and solidarity. Frontiers37: 125–150.
5.
BarlasA. (2002) Believing women in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur'an, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
6.
BilgeS. (2010) Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies31: 9–28.
7.
BolakH. (1996) Studying one's own in the Middle East: Negotiating gender and self-other dynamics in the field. Qualitative Sociology19: 107–30.
8.
BowlegL. (2008) When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles59: 312–325.
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3: 77–101.
10.
ÇahaÖ. (2013) Women and civil society in Turkey: Women's movements in a Muslim society, Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
11.
Calder-DaweO.GaveyN. (2016) Jekyll and Hyde revisited: Young people's constructions of feminism, feminists and the practice of “reasonable feminism”. Feminism & Psychology26: 487–507.
12.
ChapmanM. (2016) Veil as stigma: Exploring the role of representations in Muslim women's management of threatened social identity: How Muslim women manage the stigma of veiling. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology26: 354–366.
13.
ColeE. (2008) Coalitions as a model for intersectionality: From practice to theory. Sex Roles59: 443–453.
14.
CollinsP. (1990) Black feminist thought: Knowledge, power and the politics of empowerment, Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
15.
CrenshawK. (1991) Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43: 1241–1299.
16.
CurtinN.KendeA.KendeJ. (2016) Navigating multiple identities: The simultaneous influence of advantaged and disadvantaged identities on politicization and activism. Journal of Social Issues72: 264–285.
17.
DeVaultM. (1990) Talking and listening from women's standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems37: 96–116.
18.
DinerC.ToktasŞ. (2010) Waves of feminism in Turkey: Kemalist, Islamist and Kurdish women's movements in an era of globalization. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies12: 41–57.
19.
DiosD.BowlingM.HarrisJ. (2016) Decentering student “uniqueness” in lessons about intersectionality. In: CaseK. (ed.) Intersectional pedagogy: Complicating identity and social justice, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 194–213.
20.
EdleyN.WetherellM. (2001) Jekyll and Hyde: Men's constructions of feminism and feminists. Feminism & Psychology11: 439–457.
21.
GökarıkselB.SecorA. (2014) The veil, desire, and the gaze: Turning the inside out. Signs40: 177–200.
22.
GökarıkselB.SecorA. (2015) Post-secular geographies and the problem of pluralism: Religion and everyday life in Istanbul, Turkey. Political Geography46: 21–30.
23.
GubaE.LincolnY. (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: DenzinN.LincolnY. (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, London, UK: SAGE, pp. 105–117.
24.
Gunduz-HosgorA.SmitsJ. (2007) The status of rural women in Turkey: What is the role of regional differences?. In: MoghadamV. (ed.) From patriarchy to empowerment: Women's participation, movements, and rights in the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia, New York, NY: Syracuse University Press, pp. 180–202.
25.
HardingS. (1991) Whose science? Whose knowledge?:Thinking from women's lives, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
HartmanT. (2007) Feminism encounters traditional Judaism: Resistance and accommodation, Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press.
27.
HayfieldN.ClarkeV.HalliwellE. (2014) Bisexual women's understandings of social marginalisation: ‘The heterosexuals don't understand us but nor do the lesbians’. Feminism & Psychology24: 352–372.
28.
HopkinsN.GreenwoodR. (2013) Hijab, visibility and the performance of identity: Hijab and the performance of identity. European Journal of Social Psychology43: 438–447.
29.
KalaycıoğluE. (2007) Religiosity and protest behavior: The case of Turkey in comparative perspective. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans9: 275–291.
30.
KeskinB. (2002) Confronting double patriarchy: Islamist women in Turkey. In: BacchettaP.PowerM. (eds) Right-wing women: From conservatives to extremists around the world, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 245–257.
31.
Keskin-KozatB. (2003) Entangled in secular nationalism, feminism and Islamism: The life of Konca Kuriş. Cultural Dynamics15: 183–211.
32.
KruksS. (2001) Retrieving experience: Subjectivity and recognition in feminist politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
MahmoodS. (2005) The politics of piety. The Islamic revival and the feminist subject, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
ManningC. (1999) God gave us the right: Conservative Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, and Orthodox Jewish women grapple with feminism, Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
35.
MardinŞ. (1981) Religion and secularism in Turkey. In: KazancigilA.ÖzbudunE. (eds) Atatürk: Founder of a modern state, London, UK: C. Hurst & Company, pp. 191–219.
36.
MarecekJ. (2016) Invited reflection: Intersectionality theory and feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly40: 177–181.
37.
Mir-HosseiniZ. (2003) The construction of gender in Islamic legal thought and strategies for reform. Hawwa: Journal of Women in the Middle East and the Islamic World1: 1–28.
38.
MohantyC. (1988) Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review30: 61–88.
39.
OzyeginG. (2015) New desires, new selves: Sex, love, and piety among Turkish youth, New York, NY: New York University Press.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. (2011) Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles59: 377–391.
42.
RinaldoR. (2014) Pious and critical: Muslim women activists and the question of agency. Gender & Society28: 824–846.
43.
Scott, J. W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17, 773–797.
44.
TuksalH. (2000) Kadın karşıtı söylemin İslâm geleneğindeki izdüşümleri. [Projections of anti-women discourse in Islamic tradition], Ankara, Turkey: Kitâbiyât.
45.
TuramB. (2008) Turkish women divided by politics: Secularist activism versus pious non-resistance. International Feminist Journal of Politics10: 475–494.
46.
WadsworthN. (2011) Intersectionality in California's same-sex marriage battles: A complex proposition. Political Research Quarterly64: 200–216.
47.
WagnerW.SenR.PermanadeliR.HowarthC. (2012) The veil and Muslim women's identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture & Psychology18: 521–541.
48.
WalkerdineV. (1996) Subjectivity and social class: New directions for feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology6: 355–360.
49.
Yavuz-ÖzinanırS. (2016) Kadın perspektifli bir Islami yorumlama biçimi olarak Kadına Şiddete Karsı Müslümanlar Inisiyatifi [Muslims Against Violence Towards Women as an interpretation of Islam from women's perspective]. Fe Dergi8: 118.
50.
YılmazF. (2015) From immigrant worker to Muslim immigrant: Challenges for feminism. European Journal of Women's Studies22: 37–52.
51.
Yuval-DavisN. (2006) Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice40: 197–214.
52.
ZaatutA.Haj-YahiaM. (2016) Beliefs about wife beating among Palestinian women from Israel: The effect of their endorsement of patriarchal ideology. Feminism & Psychology26: 405–425.
53.
Zion-WaldoksT. (2015) Politics of devoted resistance: Agency, feminism, and religion among Orthodox Agunah activists in Israel. Gender & Society29: 73–97.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
