Black women are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) and report feeling unwelcome in STEM. A successful scientist exemplar or role model may signal to Black women they are valued in STEM environments. We investigated who acts as an identity-safety cue for Black women. In Study 1, Black women students who learned about a Black man or a Black woman professor in a hypothetical School of Science and Engineering reported greater anticipated belonging and trust, relative to those learning about a White man or a White woman professor. In Study 2, we recruited Black women STEM majors from a predominantly White institution and a women-only historically Black college. We examined how both groups identified role models in STEM and assessed how perceptions that role models were allies related to belonging in the institution and belonging in STEM. Across both educational environments, having Black women and Black men role models, and perceiving role models who lacked a common racial identity as allies, positively related to belonging in the institution. We encourage the use of Black exemplars and role models, as well as allies, in interventions geared toward increasing belonging among Black women in STEM. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684319830926 and a podcast for instructors who want to use this article for teaching is available on PWQ's website at http://journals.sagepub.com/page/pwq/suppl/index
AsgariS.DasguptaN.CoteN. G. (2010). When does contact with successful ingroup members change self-stereotypes?Social Psychology, 3, 203–211. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000028
2.
AsgariS.DasguptaN.StoutJ. G. (2012). When do counterstereotypic ingroup members inspire versus deflate? The effect of successful professional women on young women’s leadership self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 370–383. doi:10.1177/0146167211431968
3.
Ashburn-NardoL. (2018). What can allies do? In ColellaA.KingE. (Eds.), The handbook of workplace discrimination. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4.
AveryD. R.HernandezM.HeblM. R. (2004). Who’s watching the race? Racial salience in recruitment advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 146–161. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02541.x
5.
BealeF. (1970). Double jeopardy: To be Black and female. In CadeT. (Ed.), The Black woman: An anthology (pp. 90–100). New York, NY: New American Library.
6.
BerdahlJ. L.MooreC. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426
7.
Bonous-HammarthM. (2000). Pathways to success: Affirming opportunities for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. Journal of Negro Education, 69, 92–111.
BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T.HarveyR. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77, 135–149. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.1.135
10.
BrownK. T.OstroveJ. M. (2013). What does it mean to be an ally? The perception of allies from the perspective of people of color. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2211–2222. doi:10.1111/jasp.12172
11.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2016). Organizational identity safety cue transfers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1564–1576. doi:10.1177/0146167216665096
12.
CharlestonL. J.GeorgeP. L.JacksonJ. F.BerhanuJ.AmechiM. H. (2014). Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of Black women in US computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7, 166–176. doi:10.1037/a0036632
13.
ChenX.WekoT. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved fromhttp://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009161
14.
CheryanS.DruryB. J.VichayapaiM. (2013). Enduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s academic aspirations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 72–79. doi:10.1177/0361684312459328
15.
CheryanS.SiyJ. O.VichayapaiM.DruryB. J.KimS. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 656–664. doi:10.1177/1948550611405218
16.
ClarkJ. K.ThiemK. C.HooverA. E.HabashiM. M. (2017). Gender stereotypes and intellectual performance: Stigma consciousness as a buffer against stereotype validation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 185–191. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.002
17.
CohenG. L.GarciaJ. (2005). “I am us”: Negative stereotypes as collective threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 566–582. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.566
18.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple correlation/regression analysis for the behavioral sciences. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
19.
CookA.GlassC. (2014). Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO?Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1080–1089. doi:10.1002/smj.2161
20.
CoxeS.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 121–136. doi:10.1080/00223890802634175
21.
DasguptaN. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 231–246. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313
22.
DasguptaN.AsgariS. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003
23.
DasguptaN.ScircleM. M.HunsingerM. (2015). Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 4988–4993. doi:10.1073/pnas.1422822112
24.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276
25.
DennehyT. C.DasguptaN. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 5964–5969. doi:10.1073/pnas.1613117114
26.
DroogendykL.WrightS. C.LubenskyM.LouisW. R. (2016). Acting in solidarity: Cross-group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. Journal of Social Issues, 72, 315–334. doi:10.1111/josi.12168
27.
EmersonK. T.MurphyM. C. (2014). Identity threat at work: How social identity threat and situational cues contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in the workplace. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 508–520. doi:10.1037/a0035403
28.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
29.
GibsonD. E. (2004). Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 134–156. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00051-4
30.
GoodC.RattanA.DweckC. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700–717. doi:10.1037/a0026659
31.
GuyllM.MadonS.PrietoL.ScherrK. C. (2010). The potential roles of self-fulfilling prophecies, stigma consciousness, and stereotype threat in linking Latino/a ethnicity and educational outcomes. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 113–130. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01636.x
32.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
33.
KingK. R. (2003). Racism or sexism? Attributional ambiguity and simultaneous membership in multiple oppressed groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 223–247. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01894.x
34.
KlonoffA.LandrineH.ScottJ. (1995) Double jeopardy: Ethnicity and gender in health research. In LandrineH. (Ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 335–360). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
LandK. C.McCallP. L.NaginD. S. (1996). A comparison of Poisson, negative binomial, and semiparametric mixed Poisson regression models: With empirical applications to criminal careers data. Sociological Methods & Research, 24, 387–442.
36.
LevinS.SinclairS.VeniegasR. C.TaylorP. L. (2002). Perceived discrimination in the context of multiple group memberships. Psychological Science, 13, 557–560. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00498
37.
LewisK. L.StoutJ. G.FinkelsteinN. D.PollockS. J.MiyakeA.CohenG. L.ItoT. A. (2017). Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 420–436. doi:10.1177/0361684317720186
38.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433–442. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
39.
LockwoodP. (2006). “Someone like me can be successful”: Do college students need same-gender role models?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 36–46. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00260.x
MohrR. I.Purdie-VaughnsV. (2015). Diversity within women of color: Why experiences change felt stigma. Sex Roles, 73, 391–398. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0511-z
42.
MorgenrothT.RyanM. K.PetersK. (2015). The motivational theory of role modeling: How role models influence role aspirants’ goals. Review of General Psychology, 19, 465–483. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org.ezproxy.elon.edu/10.1037/gpr0000059
43.
Moss-RacusinC. A.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.GrahamM. J.HandelsmanJ. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16474–16479.
44.
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat how situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
45.
MurphyM. C.TaylorV. J., (2012). The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat. In InzlichtM.SchamderT. (Eds.), Stereotype threat (pp. 17–34). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
46.
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017 (Special Report NSF). Retrieved fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
OstroveJ. M.BrownK. T. (2018). Are allies who we think they are? A comparative analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48, 195–204. doi:10.1111/jasp.12502
PalmerR. T.MarambaD. C.DancyT. E. (2011). A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. The Journal of Negro Education, 491–504. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/41341155
51.
PernaL. W.GasmanM.GaryS.Lundy-WagnerV.DreznerN. D. (2010). Identifying strategies for increasing degree attainment in STEM: Lessons from minority-serving institutions. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010, 41–51. doi:10.1002/ir.360
52.
PettigrewT. F.ChristO.WagnerU.StellmacherJ. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 411–425. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.11.003
53.
PietriE. S.JohnsonI. R.OzgumusE. (2018). One size may not fit all: Exploring how the intersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 291–306. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.021
54.
PietriE. S.JohnsonI. R.OzgumusE.YoungA. I. (2018). Maybe she is relatable: Increasing women’s awareness of gender bias encourages their identification with women scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42, 192–219. doi:10.1177/0361684317752643
55.
PinelE. C. (1999). Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114–128.
56.
PinelE. C.WarnerL. R.ChuaP. P. (2005). Getting there is only half the battle: Stigma consciousness and maintaining diversity in higher education. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 481–506. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org.ezproxy.elon.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.114
57.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
58.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DiltmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615–630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
59.
RamseyL. R.BetzD. E.SekaquaptewaD. (2013). The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 377–397. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9218-6
60.
RaymanP.BrettB. (1995). Women science majors: What makes a difference in persistence after graduation?The Journal of Higher Education, 66, 388–414. doi:10.2307/2943794
61.
RemediosJ. D.ChasteenA. L.PaekJ. D. (2012). Not all prejudices are experienced equally: Comparing experiences of racism and sexism in female minorities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 273–287. doi:10.1177/1368430211411594
62.
RemediosJ. D.SnyderS. H. (2015). How women of color detect and respond to multiple forms of prejudice. Sex Roles, 73, 371–383. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0453-5
63.
RosetteA. S.LivingstonR. W. (2012). Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1162–1167. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.002
64.
SchofieldJ. W.HausmannL. R.YeF.WoodsR. L. (2010). Intergroup friendships on campus: Predicting close and casual friendships between White and African American first-year college students. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 585–602. doi:10.1177/1368430210362437
65.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.KobrynowiczD.OwenS. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197–210. doi:10.1177/0146167202282006
66.
SeskoA. K.BiernatM. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 356–360. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.016
ShmurakC. B.HandlerB. S. (1992). “Castle of science”: Mount Holyoke College and the preparation of women in chemistry, 1837-1941. History of Education Quarterly, 32, 315–342. doi:10.2307/368548
69.
SmythF. L.McArdleJ. J. (2004). Ethnic and gender differences in science graduation at selective colleges with implications for admission policy and college choice. Research in Higher Education, 45, 353–381.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0
72.
StevensF. G.PlautV. C.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2008). Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 116–133. doi:10.1177/0021886308314460
73.
StoutJ. G.DasguptaN.HunsingerM.McManusM. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385
74.
SwimJ. K.CohenL. L.HyersL. L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In SwimJ.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 37–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
75.
ThomasA. J.WitherspoonK. M.SpeightS. L. (2008). Gendered racism, psychological distress, and coping styles of African American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 307–314. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.14.4.307
76.
UtseyS. O.PonterottoJ. G.ReynoldsA. L.CancelliA. A. (2000). Racial discrimination, coping, life satisfaction, and self-esteem among African Americans. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 72–80. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb02562.x
77.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 92, 82–96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
78.
WaltonG. M.MurphyM. C.RyanA. M. (2015). Stereotype threat in organizations: Implications for equity and performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 523–550. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111322
79.
WangK.StroebeK.DovidioJ. F. (2012). Stigma consciousness and prejudice ambiguity: Can it be adaptive to perceive the world as biased?Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 241–245. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.021
80.
WestS. G.AikenL. S.KrullJ. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1–48. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.ep9606210692
81.
WilliamsJ.PhillipsK.HallE.Hastings College of the Law. Center for WorkLife Law. (2014). Double jeopardy? Gender bias against women of color in science. San Francisco, CA: Hastings College of the Law, Center for WorkLife Law.
82.
WoutD. A.MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M. (2010). When your friends matter: The effect of White students’ racial friendship networks on meta-perceptions and perceived identity contingencies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1035–1041. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
