Feminists have argued that women’s bodies, appearance, and subjectivity are formed through a multitude of regulatory dispositif and disciplinary apparatus. One such disciplinary technique has been “looking”, evidenced in work on the male gaze, disciplinary power, misrecognition, objectification, and indirect social aggression. But there remains a significant gap in the role of women’s looking in subject formation, particularly within the context of a postfeminist sensibility. To address this gap a poststructuralist informed discourse analysis was performed on interviews with 44 white heterosexual British women (aged 18–36). Four discourses deployed by the participants when talking about looking between women were identified. These discourses were as follows: judgemental looking between women is pervasive; judgement is consumption oriented; women’s looks are prioritised over men’s, foregrounding a female gaze; and appearance is the vehicle to recognition. We conclude by highlighting the importance of a postfeminist gaze for understanding women’s subjectivities, and how looking works in a postfeminist context to maintain regulation, anxiety, surveillance, and judgement.
BartkyS. L. (1990) Foucault, femininity and the modernization of patriarchal power. In: BartkyS. L. (eds) Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 63–82.
CalogeroR. M. (2004) A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly28(1): 16–21.
4.
ColemanR. (2008) The becoming of bodies: Girls, media effects and body image. Feminist Media Studies8(2): 163–179.
5.
ColemanR.Moreno FigueroaM. G. (2010) Past and future perfect: Beauty, affect and hope. Journal for Cultural Research14(4): 357–373.
6.
De LauretisT. (1984) Alice doesn’t: Feminism, semiotics, cinema, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7.
DoaneM. A. (1982) Film and the masquerade: Theorizing the female spectator. Screen23(3–4): 74–87.
8.
EvansA.RileyS. (2013) Immaculate consumption: Negotiating the sex symbol in postfeminist celebrity culture. Journal of Gender Studies22(3): 268–281.
9.
EvansA.RileyS. (2014) Technologies of sexiness: Sex, identity and consumer culture, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
FoucaultM. (1988) Technologies of the self. In: MartinL. H.GutmanH.HuttonP. (eds) Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 16–49.
11.
FoucaultM. (1993) About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self: Two lectures at Dartmouth. Political Theory21(2): 198–227.
12.
FraserN. (1995) From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age. New Left Review212: 68–94.
13.
FredricksonF.RobertsT. (1997) Objectification theory: Towards understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly21: 173–206.
14.
GillR. (2007) Gender and the media, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
15.
GillR. (2008) Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity25: 432–445.
16.
GriffinC.SzmiginI.Bengry-HowellA.HackleyC.MistralW. (2013) Inhabiting the contradictions: Hypersexual femininity and the culture of intoxication among young women in the UK. Feminism and Psychology23(2): 184–206.
17.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18(1): 59–82.
18.
HollandJ.RamazanogluC.SharpeS.ThomsonR. (1998) Male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power, London, UK: Tufnell Press.
19.
McRobbieA. (2008) Young women and consumer culture. Cultural Studies22(5): 531–550.
20.
McRobbieA. (2009) The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change, London, UK: Sage.
21.
Moreno FigueroaM. G. (2013) Displaced looks: The lived experience of beauty and racism. Feminist Theory14(2): 137–151.
22.
MulveyL. (1975) Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen16(3): 6–18.
23.
ParkerI. (1997) Discourse analysis and psycho-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology36: 479–495.
24.
PressA. L. (2011) ‘Feminism? That’s So Seventies’: Girls and young women discuss femininity and feminism in America’s Next Top Model. In: GillR.ScharffC. (eds) New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 117–133.
25.
Ramazanoglu, C. (Ed.) (1993). Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and feminism. London, UK: The Psychology Press.
26.
RenoldE.RingroseJ. (2008) Regulation and rupture: Mapping tween and teenage girls’ ‘resistance’ to the heterosexual matrix. Feminist Theory9(3): 335–360.
27.
RileyS.ReasonP. (2015) Co-operative inquiry: An action research practice. In: SmithJ. (eds) Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods, 3rd ed. London, UK: Sage, pp. 138–198.
28.
RileyS.ScharffC. (2013) Feminism vs femininity? Exploring feminist dilemmas through cooperative inquiry research. Feminism and Psychology23(2): 207–223.
29.
RingroseJ. (2013) Postfeminist education? Girls and the sexual politics of schooling, London, UK: Routledge.
30.
RingroseJ.ColemanR. (2013) Looking and desiring machines: A feminist Deleuzian mapping of bodies and affects. In: ColemanR.RingroseJ. (eds) Deleuze and methodologies, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 125–144.
31.
RingroseJ.WalkerdineV. (2008) Regulating the abject: The TV make-over as a site of neo-liberal reinvention toward bourgeois femininity. Feminist Media Studies8(3): 227–246.
32.
RoseN. (1996) Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power and personhood, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33.
ShuteR.OwensL.SleeP. T. (2002) ‘You just look at them and give them daggers’: Adolescent girls; use of nonverbal aggression. International Journal of Adolescence10: 353–372.
34.
SilvermanK. (1992) Male subjectivity at the margins, London, UK: Routledge.
35.
SkeggsB. (2001) The toilet paper: Femininity, class and mis-recognition. Women’s Studies International Forum24(3–4): 295–307.
36.
SkeggsB. (2005) The making of class and gender through visualizing moral subject formation. Sociology39(5): 965–982.
37.
StaceyJ. (1994) Star gazing: Hollywood cinema and female spectatorship, London, UK: Routledge.
38.
TseëlonE.KaiserS. B.DenzinN. K. (1992) A dialogue with feminist film theory: Multiple readings of the gaze. Studies in Symbolic Interaction13: 119–137.
39.
UnderwoodM. K. (2004) Glares of contempt, eye rolls of disgust and turning away to exclude: Non-verbal forms of social aggression among girls. Feminism and Psychology14(5): 371–375.
40.
WalkerdineV. (2003) Reclassifying upward mobility: Femininity and the neo-liberal subject. Gender and Education15(3): 237–248.
41.
WinchA. (2012) The girlfriend gaze. Soundings52: 21–32.
42.
WinchA. (2013) Girlfriends and postfeminist sisterhood, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
