This article uses discursive psychology and conversation analysis to examine a Swedish online forum thread in which participants, who present as women on long-term sick leave, make gender equality relevant when discussing housework. Doing housework can challenge the legitimacy of the sick leave, and as a woman, one risks being categorized as a “housewife.” Such a categorization can work to undermine sick leave legitimacy and is also problematic given norms of gender equality in Sweden. In the studied data, such inferences are managed by invoking a (male) partner in accounts for housework or by humorous and ironic gendered categorizations. The analysis focuses on how this is done in the fine details of the interaction, showing how sick leave legitimacy is managed within a normative framework of gender equality. The study provides a practically oriented approach to the gendered aspects of sick leave legitimacy and sheds light on the delicate interplay between gender equality and sick leave in everyday life.
BackhansM (2004) Varför är kvinnor mer sjukskrivna än män? En kunskapsöversikt. In: HogstedtCBjurvaldMMarklundSPalmerETheorellT (eds) Den Höga Sjukfrånvaron—Sanning Och Konsekvens (R 2004:15), Stockholm: Statens Folkhälsoinstitut, pp. 175–206.
2.
Baym NK (1995) The performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1(2): doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1995.tb00327.x.
3.
BergqvistC (1999) Equal Democracies? Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
4.
BergqvistCOlsson BlandyTSainsburyD (2007) Swedish state feminism: Continuity and change. In: OutshoornJKantolaJ (eds) Changing State Feminism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 224–245.
5.
BorchorstA (2011) Scandinavian gender equality: Competing discourses and paradoxes. In: AddisEde VillottaPDegavreFEriksenJ (eds) Gender and Well-Being. The Role of Institutions, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 63–75.
6.
BorchorstASiimB (2008) Woman-friendly policies and state feminism. Theorizing Scandinavian gender equality. Feminist Theory9(2): 207–224.
7.
CliftR (1999) Irony in conversation. Language in Society28(4): 523–553.
8.
CrawfordM (2003) Gender and humor in social context. Journal of Pragmatics35: 1413–1430.
9.
DixonJWetherellM (2004) On discourse and dirty nappies: Gender, the division of household labour and the social psychology of distributive justice. Theory and Psychology14(2): 167–189.
10.
DresnerEHerringSC (2010) Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory20(3): 249–268.
11.
DrewP (1998) Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction31(3/4): 295–325.
12.
EdwardsD (2000) Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction33(4): 347–373.
13.
EdwardsD (2005) Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies7(1): 5–29.
14.
EdwardsD (2007) Managing subjectivity in talk. In: HepburnAWigginsS (eds) Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–49.
15.
FlinkfeldtM (2011) Filling one's days': Managing sick leave legitimacy in an online forum. Sociology of Health and Illness33(5): 761–776.
16.
GarciaACJacobsJB (1999) The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction32(4): 337–367.
17.
GoodwinC (1986) Unilateral departure. In: ButtonGLeeJRE (eds) Talk and Social Organization, Clavendon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 206–216.
18.
GuiseJWiddicombeSMcKinlayA (2007) What is it like to have ME?': The discursive construction of ME in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Health11(1): 87–108.
19.
HaakanaM (2001) Laughter as a patient's resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text21(1/2): 187–219.
20.
HaavindHMagnussonE (2005) The Nordic countries—Welfare paradises for women and children?Feminism & Psychology15(2): 227–235.
21.
HarrysonLNovoMHammarströmA (2012) Is gender inequality in the domestic sphere associated with psychological distress among women and men? Results from the Northern Swedish Cohort. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health66: 271–276.
22.
HausmannRTysonLDZahidiS (2012) The Global Gender Gap Report 2012, Geneva: World Economic Forum.
23.
HepburnAPotterJ (2011) Recipients designed: Tag questions and gender. In: SpeerSAStokoeEH (eds) Conversation and Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–152.
24.
HeritageJRaymondG (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly68(1): 15–38.
25.
HirdmanY (2002) Genus—Om Det Stabilas Föränderliga Former, Stockholm: Liber.
26.
HochschildAR (1989) The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home, New York: Viking.
27.
HolthLJordanssonBGonäsL (2012) Gender and the division of labour in a Swedish context. In: SamuelssonMJKrekulaCÅbergM (eds) Gender and Change. Power, Politics and Everyday Practices, Karlstad: Karlstad University Press, pp. 75–94.
28.
HorneJWigginsS (2009) Doing being ‘on the edge': Managing the dilemma of being authentically suicidal in an online forum. Sociology of Health and Illness31(2): 170–184.
JayyusiL (1984) Categorisation and the Moral Order, London: Routledge.
31.
JeffersonG (1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346–369.
LamerichsJte MolderHFM (2003) Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society5(4): 451–473.
35.
LundströmCTwineFW (2011) White migrations: Swedish women, gender vulnerabilities and racial privileges. European Journal of Women's Studies18(1): 67–86.
36.
MagnussonE (2005) Gendering or equality in the lives of Nordic heterosexual couples with children: No well-paved avenues yet. NORA: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies13(3): 153–163.
37.
MagnussonE (2006) Hon, Han och Hemmet: Genuspsykologiska Perspektiv på Vardagslivet I Nordiska Barnfamiljer, Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
38.
MagnussonE (2008) The rhetoric of inequality: Nordic women and men argue against sharing house-work. NORA: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies16(2): 79–95.
39.
MarklundSBjurvaldMHogstedtC (2005) Den Höga Sjukfrånvaron—Problem Och Lösningar, Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet.
40.
MastekaasaA (2000) Parenthood, gender and sickness absence. Social Science & Medicine50(12): 1827–1842.
41.
Meredith J and Stokoe E (in press) Repair: Comparing Facebook ‘chat' with spoken interaction. Discourse and Communication.
42.
MulkayM (1988) On Humor, New York: Basil Blackwell.
43.
NorrickNR (1993) Conversational Joking, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
44.
NorrickNRSpitzA (2008) Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics40: 1661–1686.
45.
OsvaldssonK (2004) On laughter and disagreement in multiparty assessment talk. Text24(4): 517–545.
46.
PaccagnellaL (1997) Getting the seats of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication3(1).
47.
PittsV (2004) Illness and internet empowerment: Writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace. Health8(1): 33–59.
48.
PomerantzA (1978) Compliment response: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In: SchenkeinJN (eds) Studies in the Organisation of Conversational Interaction, New York: Academic Press, pp. 79–112.
49.
PomerantzA (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.
50.
PomerantzA (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimising claims. Human Studies9: 219–229.
51.
PotterJ (2005) Making psychology relevant. Discourse & Society16(5): 739–747.
52.
RaymondG (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review68(6): 939–967.
53.
RaymondGHeritageJ (2006) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society35(5): 677–705.
SneijderPte MolderHFM (2004) Health should not have to be a problem': Talking health and accountability in an internet forum on veganism. Journal of Health Psychology9(4): 599–616.
56.
SpeerSA (2011) On the role of reported, third-party compliments in passing as a ‘real' woman. In: SpeerSAStokoeEH (eds) Conversation and Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–182.
57.
SpeerSAStokoeEH (2011) An introduction to conversation and gender. In: SpeerSAStokoeEH (eds) Conversation and Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–27.
58.
Statistics Sweden (2012) Swedish Time Use Survey 2010/11. Living Conditions, Report 123. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.
59.
StokoeEH (2000) Toward a conversation analytic approach to gender and discourse. Feminism & Psychology10(4): 552–563.
60.
StokoeEH (2003) Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorization in neighbour disputes. Feminism & Psychology13(3): 317–344.
61.
StokoeEH (2006) On ethnomethodology, feminism, and the analysis of categorial reference to gender in talk-in-interaction. The Sociological Review54(3): 467–494.
62.
StokoeEH (2012) Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies14(3): 277–303.
63.
SunderlandJ (2000) Baby entertainer: Bumbling assistant and line manager: Discourses of fatherhood in parentcraft texts. Discourse & Society11(2): 249–274.
64.
TownsA (2002) Paradoxes of (in)equality: Something is rotten in the gender equal state of Sweden. Cooperation and Conflict37(2): 157–179.
65.
WattsJ (2007) Can't take a joke? Humour as resistance, refuge and exclusion in a highly gendered workplace. Feminism & Psychology17(2): 259–266.
66.
WeatherallA (2012) Discursive psychology and feminism. British Journal of Social Psychology51(3): 463–470.
WestCZimmermanDH (2009) Accounting for doing gender. Gender & Society23(1): 112–122.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
