Basic Income (BI) has gained traction as a potential welfare reform, yet its political feasibility remains contested. This study explores how public support for BI varies across European countries, focusing on two central policy design dimensions: conditionality (e.g., work requirements) and universality (e.g., eligibility for newcomers). Using data from a vignette experiment embedded in the 2023 Cross-National Online Survey (CRONOS) across ten European countries, we analyze how design preferences intersect with individual-level factors political ideology, economic insecurity, and welfare chauvinism. Results show robust support for conditional BI models, indicating widespread preference for linking benefits to job-seeking. In contrast, preferences regarding universality are more fragmented and context-dependent. Right-leaning and chauvinistic individuals tend to oppose universal and unconditional models, while those experiencing economic insecurity are generally more supportive—though this relationship varies across countries and BI designs.
AlesinaAGlaeserE (2004) Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AtkinsonAB (1996) The case for a participation income. The Political Quarterly67: 67–70.
3.
AuspurgKJäckleA (2017) First equals most important? Order effects in vignette-based measurement. Sociological Methods & Research46(3): 490–539.
4.
BaranowskiMJabkowskiP (2019) Basic income attitudes and welfare regimes: a comparative case study based on the survey results from selected European countries. Studia Socjologiczne2(233): 37–60.
5.
BayAHPedersenAW (2006) The limits of social solidarity: basic income, immigration and the legitimacy of the universal welfare state. Acta Sociologica49(4): 419–436.
6.
BayAHHellevikTPedersenAW (2024) Popular Support for a Universal Basic Income–Still Sensitive to Playing the Immigration Card?European Journal of Social Security, 13882627241278111.
7.
BellDAValentaM (2024) Who would never grant them equal rights? A comparative analysis of welfare chauvinism in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Social Work27: 1287–1302.
8.
BradyDFinniganR (2014) Does immigration undermine public support for social policy?American Sociological Review79(1): 17–42.
9.
CarejaRHarrisE (2022) Thirty years of welfare chauvinism research: findings and challenges. Journal of European Social Policy32(2): 212–224.
10.
ChoiG (2021) Basic human values and attitudes towards a universal basic income in Europe. Basic Income Studies16(2): 101–123.
11.
ChrispJPulkkaVVRincón GarcíaL (2020) Snowballing or wilting? What affects public support for varying models of basic income?Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy36(3): 223–236.
12.
CrepazMMDamronR (2009) Constructing tolerance: how the welfare state shapes attitudes about immigrants. Comparative Political Studies42(3): 437–463.
13.
CzymaraCSSchmidt-CatranAW (2017) Refugees unwelcome? Changes in the public acceptance of immigrants and refugees in Germany in the course of Europe’s ‘immigration crisis. European Sociological Review33(6): 735–751.
14.
DavidovEMeulemanB (2012) Explaining attitudes towards immigration policies in European countries: the role of human values. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38(5): 757–775.
15.
De WispelaereJNogueraJ (2012) On the political feasibility of universal basic income: an analytic framework. In: CaputoR (ed) Basic Income Guarantee and Politics. International Experiences and Perspectives on Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, 1739.
16.
De WispelaereJStirtonL (2004) The many faces of universal basic income. The Political Quarterly75(3): 266–274.
17.
DingeldeyI (2007) Between workfare and enablement–The different paths to transformation of the welfare state: a comparative analysis of activating labour market policies. European Journal of Political Research46(6): 823–851.
18.
DustmannCPrestonI (2006) Is immigration good or bad for the economy? Analysis of attitudinal responses. In: The Economics of Immigration and Social Diversity. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
19.
DustmannCPrestonI (2007) Racial and economic factors in attitudes to immigration. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy7(1): 1–39.
20.
Ennser-JedenastikL (2020) The FPÖ’s welfare chauvinism. Osterreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft49(1): 1–13.
21.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford University Press.
22.
FinchWHHernandez FinchM (2017) Multivariate regression with small samples: a comparison of estimation methods. General Linear Model Journal43(1): 16–30.
23.
FranciscoCOttoAVan LanckerW (2024) Labour supply reactions to basic income: insights from 60 years of research. Socio-Economic Review22: 1559–1581.
24.
GarlandR (1991) The mid-point on a rating scale: is it desirable. Marketing Bulletin2(1): 66–70.
25.
GonzalezSBBidadanureJ (2020). Universal basic income: what’s in a name.
26.
HjorthF (2016) Who benefits? Welfare chauvinism and national stereotypes. European Union Politics17(1): 3–24.
27.
KevinsA (2022) When does immigration shape support for a universal basic income? The role of education and employment status. In: Handbook on Migration and Welfare. Edward Elgar Publishing, 137–155.
28.
KootstraA (2016) Deserving and undeserving welfare claimants in Britain and The Netherlands: examining the role of ethnicity and migration status using a vignette experiment. European Sociological Review32(3): 325–338.
29.
KremerM (2016) Earned citizenship: labour migrants’ views on the welfare state. Journal of Social Policy45(3): 395–415.
30.
LaenenT (2023) The Popularity of Basic Income: Evidence from the Polls. Springer Nature.
31.
LaenenTMeulemanB (2019) Public support for the social rights and social obligations of the unemployed: two sides of the same coin?International Journal of Social Welfare28(4): 454–467.
32.
LaenenTVan HootegemARossettiF (2023) The multidimensionality of public support for basic income: a vignette experiment in Belgium. Journal of European Public Policy30(5): 849–872.
33.
LandiniI (2022). Welfare chauvinism and social policy: how politicians justify migrants’ exclusion from social programs in Western Europe.
34.
LarsenCA (2008) The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: how welfare regimes influence public support. Comparative Political Studies41(2): 145–168.
35.
LeeS (2021) Politics of universal and unconditional cash transfer: examining attitudes toward universal basic income. Basic Income Studies16(2): 191–208.
36.
LinnanvirtaSKrollCBlombergH (2019) The perceived legitimacy of a basic income among Finnish food aid recipients. International Journal of Social Welfare28(3): 271–281.
37.
McGannMNguyenPConsidineM (2020) Welfare conditionality and blaming the unemployed. Administration & Society52(3): 466–494.
38.
MewesJMauS (2013) Globalization, socio-economic status and welfare chauvinism: European perspectives on attitudes toward the exclusion of immigrants. International Journal of comparative sociology54(3): 228–245.
39.
MoeringK (2012) The fixed effects approach as alternative to multilevel models for cross–national analyses. The GK Soclife working paper series.
40.
MulayiMLLaenenTVan LanckerW, et al. (2023) New directions in research on public support for universal basic income. In: RoosmaFLaenenT (eds) A Research Agenda for Public Attitudes to Welfare. Edward Edgar, 81–100.
41.
OorschotW (2000) Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics28(1): 33–48.
42.
ParolinZSiölandL (2020) Support for a universal basic income: a demand–capacity paradox?Journal of European Social Policy30(1): 5–19.
43.
ReeskensTVan der MeerT (2019) The inevitable deservingness gap: a study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness. Journal of European Social Policy29(2): 166–181.
44.
ReeskensTVan OorschotW (2012) Disentangling the ‘New Liberal Dilemma’: on the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology53(2): 120–139.
45.
Rincon GarcíaL (2021) The Paradox of Universality: Preferences for Universal Basic Income in Finland and Spain. Doctoral dissertation. Universitat de Barcelona. https://hdl.handle.net/2445/180443(accessed07 July 2022).
46.
Rincon GarcíaL (2023) A Robin Hood for all: a conjoint experiment on support for basic income. Journal of European Public Policy30(2): 375–399.
47.
Rincon GarcíaLVlandasTHiilamoH (2022) What’s not to like? Benefit design, funding structure and support for universal basic income. Journal of European Social Policy32(4): 467–483.
48.
RoosmaFVan OorschotW (2020) Public opinion on basic income: mapping European support for a radical alternative for welfare provision. Journal of European Social Policy30(2): 190–205.
49.
RossettiFRoosmaFLaenenT, et al. (2020) An unconditional basic income? How Dutch citizens justify their opinions about a basic income and work conditionality. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy36(3): 284–300.
50.
RossettiFAbtsKMeulemanB, et al. (2021) “First the grub, then the morals”? Disentangling the self-interest and ideological drivers of attitudes towards demanding activation policies in Belgium. Journal of Social Policy50(2): 346–366.
51.
RossettiFMeulemanBBauteS (2022) Explaining public support for demanding activation of the unemployed: the role of subjective risk perceptions and stereotypes about the unemployed. Journal of European Social Policy32(5): 497–513.
52.
Stadelmann-SteffenIDermontC (2020) Citizens’ opinions about basic income proposals compared–A conjoint analysis of Finland and Switzerland. Journal of Social Policy49(2): 383–403.
53.
TajfelH (1982). Experimental studies of intergroup behaviour. In CodolJPLeyensJP (eds) Cognitive Analysis of Social Behavior (pp. 227–246). Springer.
54.
Van Der WaalJDe KosterWVan OorschotW (2020) Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. In: Policy Sectors in Comparative Policy Analysis Studies. Routledge, 167–184.
55.
Van ParijsP (2004) Basic income: a simple and powerful idea for the twenty-first century. Politics & Society32(1): 7–39.
56.
VlandasT (2021) The political economy of individual-level support for the basic income in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy31(1): 62–77.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
