Gender mainstreaming is designed to address the social roles of both women and men. How are men included in gender equality policies? I conduct an analysis of all gender equality strategies and annual reports of the European Commission – a global leader in this field – since 1982. I find that, since the mid 1990s, the Commission has included men as contributors to gender equality (‘problem solvers’). Yet, men’s disadvantages in education and health were only addressed between 2006 and 2015. Later on, men’s problems have been ignored, as they have been increasingly portrayed as a uniformly privileged group, undeserving of European policies. This withdrawal from addressing men’s problems exposes the tension between legitimising policies for one group (women) and addressing the needs of a complementary group (men). A novel approach to gender equality policies should revive the global debate on their meaning and implications. My findings also raise new questions about the power of the European Commission to construct policy target populations.
AbelsGMushabenJM (2020) Great expectations, structural limitations: Ursula von Der Leyen and the Commission’s New Equality Agenda. Journal of Communication and Media Studies: Journal of Common Market Studies58(S1): 121–132. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13102.
2.
AhrensP (2019) The birth, life, and death of policy instruments: 35 years of EU gender equality policy programmes. West European Politics42(1): 45–66. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2018.1490561.
3.
BoothCBennettC (2002) Gender mainstreaming in the European Union: towards a new conception and practice of equal opportunities?European Journal of Women's Studies9(4): 430–446. DOI: 10.1177/13505068020090040401.
4.
BöttcherLAraújoNAMNaglerJ, et al. (2016) Gender gap in the ERASMUS mobility program. PLoS One11(2): e0149514. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149514.
5.
CapuchaLEstêvãoPCaladoA, et al. (2014) The role of stereotyping in public policy legitimation: the case of the pigs label. Comparative Sociology13(4): 482–502. DOI: 10.1163/15691330-12341316.
6.
CollinsonDHearnJ (1994) Naming men as men: implications for work, organization and management. Gender, Work and Organization1(1): 2–22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.1994.tb00002.x.
DuinaF (2021) Is academic research useful to EU officials? The logic of institutional openness in the Commission. Journal of European Public Policy29(0): 1493–1511. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1968016.
9.
ElomäkiA (2015) The economic case for gender equality in the European Union: selling gender equality to decision-makers and neoliberalism to women’s organizations. European Journal of Women's Studies22(3): 288–302. DOI: 10.1177/1350506815571142.
10.
EsmarkASchoopSR (2017) Deserving social benefits? Political framing and media framing of ‘deservingness’ in two welfare reforms in Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy27(5): 417–432. DOI: 10.1177/0958928716688262.
11.
European Commission (2010) Actions to Implement the Strategy for Equality between Women and Men 2010–2015. Luxembourg: European Commission.
12.
European Commission (2011) The State of Men’s Health in Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission.
FarmbryK (2010) Administration and the Other: Explorations of Diversity and Marginalization in the Political Administrative State. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
15.
GuerrinaRWrightKAM (2016) Gendering normative power Europe: lessons of the women, peace and security agenda. International Affairs92(2): 293–312. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12555.
16.
HartlappMMüllerHTömmelI (2021) Gender equality and the European commission. In: AbelsGKrizsánAMacRaeH, et al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics. Abingdon: Routledge, 133–145.
17.
HearnJEWojnickaKŠmídováI, et al. (2021) The EU, men and masculinities. In: AbelsGKrizsánAMacRaeH, et al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics. Abingdon: Routledge, 80–92.
18.
Herbst-DebbyA (2022) (De)legitimization of single mothers’ welfare rights: United States, Britain and Israel. Journal of European Social Policy32(3): 302–316. DOI: 10.1177/09589287221076743.
19.
HsiehH-FShannonSE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research15(9): 1277–1288. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
20.
JacquotS (2020) European Union gender equality policies since 1957. In: Encyclopédie d'histoire numérique de l’Europe. https://ehne.fr/en/node/12435.
21.
KantolaJLombardoE (2020) Strategies of right populists in opposing gender equality in a polarized European parliament. International Political Science Review42: 0192512120963953.
22.
KronsellA (2016a) The power of EU masculinities: a feminist contribution to European integration theory. Journal of Communication and Media Studies: Journal of Common Market Studies54(1): 104–120. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12328.
23.
KronsellA (2016b) Sexed bodies and military masculinities: gender path dependence in EU’s common security and defense policy. Men and Masculinities19(3): 311–336. DOI: 10.1177/1097184X15583906.
24.
LarsenCA (2008) The political logic of labour market reforms and popular images of target groups. Journal of European Social Policy18(1): 50–63. DOI: 10.1177/0958928707084451.
25.
LombardoEMeierP (2008) Framing gender equality in the European Union political discourse. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society15(1): 101–129. DOI: 10.1093/sp/jxn001.
26.
MacRaeH (2010) The EU as a gender equal polity: myths and realities. Journal of Communication and Media Studies: Journal of Common Market Studies48(1): 155–174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02046.x.
27.
MatthijsMMcNamaraK (2015) The euro crisis’ theory effect: northern saints, southern sinners, and the demise of the eurobond. Journal of European Integration37(2): 229–245. DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2014.990137.
28.
MeierPPetersonETertineggK, et al. (2007) The pregnant worker and caring mother: framing family policies across Europe. In: VerlooM (ed) Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press, 109–140.
29.
MessnerMA (1997) Politics of Masculinities: Men in Movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30.
OorschotW (2000) Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy and Politics28: 33–48. DOI: 10.1332/0305573002500811.
31.
O’DwyerM (2018) Making sense of austerity: the gendered ideas of European economic policy. Comparative European Politics16(5): 745–761. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-018-0129-y.
32.
RawłuszkoM (2021) And if the opponents of gender ideology are right? Gender politics, Europeanization, and the democratic deficit. Politics and Gender17(2): 301–323. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X19000576.
33.
ReesT (1998) Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203010044.
34.
ScamborEWojnickaKBergmannN (eds) (2013) The Role of Men in Gender Equality: European Strategies and Insights. Luxembourg: Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/14738.
35.
SchmidtV (2005) Gender Mainstreaming -- an Innovation in Europe? The Institutionalisation of Gender Mainstreaming in the European Commission. Leverkusen, Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
36.
SchneiderAIngramH (1993) Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review87(2): 334–347. DOI: 10.2307/2939044.
37.
SchneiderAIngramH (2017) Framing the target in policy formulation: the importance of social constructions. In: HowlettMMukherjeeI (eds) Handbook of Policy Formulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 320–336. DOI: 10.4337/9781784719326.00028.
38.
StarkeAM (2020) Poverty, policy, and federal administrative discourse: are bureaucrats speaking equitable antipoverty policy designs into existence?Public Administration Review80(6): 1087–1099. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13191.
39.
VerlooMBusteloMLombardoE (2007) Conclusions on framing gender inequality as a policy problem in Europe. In: VerlooM (ed) Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press, 281–301.
40.
VleutenAVerlooM (2012) Ranking and benchmarking: the political logic of new regulatory instruments in the fields of gender equality and anti-corruption. Policy and Politics40(1): 73–88. DOI: 10.1332/030557310X550097.
41.
Watkins-HayesCKovalskyE (2016) The discourse of deservingness: morality and the dilemmas of poverty relief in debate and practice. In: BradyDBurtonLM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199914050.013.10.
42.
WelfensN (2020) Protecting refugees inside, protecting borders abroad? Gender in the EU’s responses to the ‘refugee crisis’. Political Studies Review18(3): 378–392. DOI: 10.1177/1478929919887349.
43.
WelfensN (2021) Whose (in)security counts in crisis? Selection categories in Germany’s humanitarian admission programmes before and after 2015. International Politics59: 505–524. DOI: 10.1057/s41311-021-00311-6.
44.
WoodwardAE (2012) From equal treatment to gender mainstreaming and diversity management. In: AbelsGMushabenJM (eds) Gendering the European Union: New Approaches to Old Democratic Deficits, Gender and Politics Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 85–103. DOI: 10.1057/9780230353299_5.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
