Studies have shown positive impact of family policies on women’s labour market participation over the last decades. How, then, does it influence the types of jobs women obtain when they (re-)enter the labour market? Using multi-level modelling, this study examines how different work–family balance policies (that is, leave policies, childcare services) shape gendered labour market patterns and whether or not it mitigates women’s overrepresentation among the labour market Outsiders across Europe. I use European Working Conditions Survey 2015 data and cover 30 European countries. Specifically focusing on women’s relative likelihood of being labour market Outsiders compared to men, I find that certain policies help women avoid being Outsiders, while the others may reinforce the existing gender inequality in the labour market. This resonates with the welfare state paradox and family policy trade-off literature that the policies that do not disrupt the gender norms may in turn maintain or enhance them.
AckerJ (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society4(2): 139–158.
2.
AndersenSH (2018) Paternity leave and the motherhood penalty: new causal evidence. Journal of Marriage and Family80(5): 1125–1143.
3.
AnkerR (1997) Theories of occupational segregation by sex: an overview. International Labour Review136(3): 315–340.
4.
BiegertT (2014) On the outside looking in? Transitions out of non-employment in the United Kingdom and Germany. Journal of European Social Policy24(1): 3–18.
5.
BudigMJMisraJBoeckmannI (2016) Work–family policy trade-offs for mothers? Unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work and Occupations43(2): 119–177.
6.
ChouYPfau-EffingerBKrögerT, et al (2017) Impact of care responsibilities on women’s employment: a comparison between European and East Asian welfare states. European Societies19(2): 157–177.
7.
ChungH (2019) National-level family policies and workers’ access to schedule control in a European comparative perspective: crowding out or in, and for whom?Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice21(1): 25–46.
8.
CorrellSJBenardSPaikI (2007) Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology112(5): 1297–1338.
9.
EmmeneggerPHäusermannSPalierB, et al (eds), (2012) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) Politics without class? Post-industrial cleavages in Europe and America. In: KitscheltHLangePMarksG, et al (eds), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 293–316.
11.
Estévez-AbeMIversenTSoskiceD, et al (2001) Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state. In: HallPASoskiceD (eds), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 145–183.
12.
FernandezRMFriedrichC (2011) Gender sorting at the application interface. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society50(4): 591–609.
13.
Fernandez-MateoIKingZ (2011) Anticipatory sorting and gender segregation in temporary employment. Management Science57(6): 989–1008.
14.
HegewischAGornickJC (2011) The impact of work–family policies on women's employment: a review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family14(2): 119–138.
15.
HodgesMJBudigMJ (2010) Who gets the daddy bonus? Organizational hegemonic masculinity and the impact of fatherhood on earnings. Gender & Society24(6): 717–745.
16.
HobsonB (2011) The agency gap in work–life balance: applying Sen’s capabilities framework within European contexts. Social Politics18(2): 147–167.
17.
HookJPettitB (2016) Reproducing occupational inequality: motherhood and occupational segregation. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society23(3): 329–362.
18.
HoxJ (2002) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
HvindenBO'ReillyJSchoyenMA, et al (2019) Negotiating Early Job Insecurity: Well-Being, Scarring and Resilience of European Youth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
20.
ILO (International Labour Organization) (2019) A Quantum Leap for Gender Equality: For a Better Future of Work for All. Geneva: ILO. [Online].
21.
KeckWSaracenoC (2013) The impact of different social-policy frameworks on social inequalities among women in the European Union: the labour-market participation of mothers. Social Politics20(3): 297–328.
22.
KorpiW (2000) Faces of inequality: gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society7(2): 127–191.
23.
KorpiWFerrariniTEnglundS (2013) Women’s opportunities under different family policy constellations: gender, class, and inequality tradeoffs in western countries re-examined. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society20(1): 1–40.
24.
LefebvrePMerriganP (2008) Child-care policy and the labor supply of mothers with young children: a natural experiment from Canada. Journal of Labor Economics26(3): 519–548.
25.
LevanonAEnglandPAllisonP (2009) Occupational feminization and pay: assessing causal dynamics using 1950–2000 US census data. Social Forces88(2): 865–891.
26.
MandelHSemyonovM (2006) A welfare state paradox: state interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology111(6): 1910–1949.
27.
MisraJBudigMJBoeckmannI (2011) Work–family policies and the effects of children on women’s employment hours and wages. Community, Work & Family14(2): 139–157.
28.
MorosowK (2019) A Family Leave Length Trade-Off? Women's Labour Force Status in Comparative Perspective. PhD Thesis. Sweden: Stockholm University.
29.
NormanH (2020) Does paternal involvement in childcare influence mothers’ employment trajectories during the early stages of parenthood in the UK?Sociology54(2): 329–345.
PalierBThelenK (2010) Institutionalizing dualism: complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society38(1): 119–148.
32.
Pfau-EffingerB (2017) Development of Culture, Welfare States and Women’s Employment in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
33.
RønsenMSundströmM (2002) Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers: a comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden. European Journal of Population/Revue Europeenne De Demographie18(2): 121–152.
34.
RudmanLAMescherK (2013) Penalizing men who request a family leave: is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma?Journal of Social Issues69(2): 322–340.
35.
SchwanderHHäusermannS (2013) Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders. Journal of European Social Policy23(3): 248–269.
36.
SeoH (2021) ‘Dual’ labour market? Patterns of segmentation in European labour markets and the varieties of precariousness. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research27(4): 485–503.
37.
Sigle-RushtonWWaldfogelJ (2007) Motherhood and women’s earnings in Anglo-American, Continental European, and Nordic countries. Feminist Economics13(2): 55–91.
38.
StegmuellerD (2013) How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science57(3): 748–761.
39.
YerkesM (2009) Part-time work in the Dutch welfare state: the ideal combination of work and care?Policy & Politics37(4): 535–552.
40.
YoonYChungH (2016) New forms of dualization? Labour market segmentation patterns in the UK from the late 90s until the post-crisis in the late 2000s. Social Indicators Research128(2): 609–631.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
